Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

TCP over TCP is a bad idea (2000)

TCP over TCP is a bad idea (2000)

9 comments

·October 24, 2024
Visit

01HNNWZ0MV43FF

Port forwarding doesn't count, right?

Svip

I notice that the earliest version of this post[0] is dated 1999, whilst the latest version is modified in 2001 (see the main link). Which year would be appropriate to mark it on HN? 1999? 2001?

[0] https://web.archive.org/web/20000310230940/http://sites.inka...

Shared404

IMO the latest update is the best option. Or a syntax like (<original date>, updated <update date>) if the update was not super substantial.

dmitrygr

sqrt(1999 * 2001)

schmidtleonard

(1999^-1 + 2001^-1)^-1

exe34

2000ish

dang

Related:

Why TCP over TCP is a bad idea (2001) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25080693 - Nov 2020 (68 comments)

Why TCP Over TCP Is a Bad Idea (2001) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9281954 - March 2015 (43 comments)

Why TCP Over TCP Is A Bad Idea - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2409090 - April 2011 (26 comments)

null

[deleted]

null

[deleted]