Software-Defined Radio for Engineers (2018) [pdf]
analog.com
Mathematical Foundations of Reinforcement Learning
github.com
Canon EF and RF Lenses – All Autofocus Motors
exclusivearchitecture.com
You suck at CSS (and that's okay)
rexriepe.com
The shrouded sinister history of the bulldozer
noemamag.com
Performance of the Python 3.14 tail-call interpreter
blog.nelhage.com
Show HN: In-Browser Graph RAG with Kuzu-WASM and WebLLM
blog.kuzudb.com
People are just as bad as my LLMs
wilsoniumite.com
Music labels will regret coming for the Internet Archive, sound historian says
arstechnica.com
Zero-Downtime Kubernetes Deployments on AWS with EKS
glasskube.dev
STEPS Toward the Reinvention of Programming [pdf]
tinlizzie.org
How to Implement a Cosine Similarity Function in TypeScript
alexop.dev
A technical history of Acorn Computers
mcmordie.co.uk
What made the Irish famine so deadly
newyorker.com
uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store
chromewebstore.google.com
Sigint in Fiction
siginthistorian.blogspot.com
3dfx: So powerful, it's kind of ridiculous (2023)
abortretry.fail
Probabilistic Artificial Intelligence
arxiv.org
An election forecast that’s 50-50 is not “giving up”
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Trees not profits: we're giving up our right to ever sell Ecosia (2018)
blog.ecosia.org
Apple Exclaves
randomaugustine.medium.com
Planes are having their GPS hacked. Could new clocks keep them safe?
bbc.com
I look at the raw data scans like in Fig 2, and for the life of me am not convinced they just make stuff up in the other charts. It's just one of those things where being so not familiar with the raw data makes it hard to really see it for what it is. Similar to how some people don't understand FLIR images are heat readings and not black&white video. Lot's of "fun" TV shows trying to prove/disprove something underground with ground penetrating radar, yet the results are just never really convincing unless "you want to believe". Otherwise, they are very Rorschach looking to me. It's almost like the raw data is someone drawing a circle, and then the pretty charts is where someone drew the rest of the fucking owl.
I guess this says more about my level of disbelief of any new studies like this though