Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

A drill bit that can also drive screws

A drill bit that can also drive screws

78 comments

·February 9, 2025

sonofhans

Oh wow, a coffee-maker/fax-machine. I’ve used, collected, lost, sharpened, broken more drill bits and drivers than I can count. I’ve never wished for a worse drill bit attached to a worse screw driver.

I bet they’ll sell a lot of these to homeowners with deck projects, or small softwood projects, and I bet they’ll work just fine for that.

The use case limits how hard they can make these. Absolutely the philips head will get munged being used as a drill bit, and then it’ll cam out of screws at the wrong time. If your driver bit is much harder than your screws then the screws will get stripped. A stripped screw in something important is worse than a broken driver.

prescriptivist

> I bet they’ll sell a lot of these to homeowners with deck projects, or small softwood projects, and I bet they’ll work just fine for that.

Wow look at this guy. All you homeowners should take note of the hardcore hardwood builder who has lost more bits than you’ve wasted watching DIY YouTube. This guy’s middle name is carbide and his dog’s name is Torx. He considers 8ah batteries consumables. Time and space lags behind how fast he can put a lag bolt in a 4x4 and if you ever luck into seeing such a visage, it will be galvanized in your mind.

manmal

GP is absolutely right, though. I also won’t be having this bit with me when I’m drilling something else than wood. We should also ask ourselves, why are not all, or at least any, drill heads philips-shaped if they are a viable option?

EDIT: Removed some

mizzao

Thank you for a fantastic piece of writing

forgetfreeman

You ok over there? Combo meal tools invariably suck at all of the tasks they claim to solve. Nothing controversial enough there to warrant a response much less snark.

cjbgkagh

I was about to write something similar. I am surprised by how many are taking this idea seriously, here on HN and I guess Good Design Australia.

zonkerdonker

Oof. Yeah this shouldve stayed a render. The headline tells me all I need to know. Industrial designer creating a tool is like a graphic designer making a bridge.

To any industrial designers here, this is said with minimum animosity, the arts are important and I cherish them. But for the love of god, if you send me over another step file with a surfacing update that has moved the model coodinate system like 3 microns and changed almost nothing else I might come over and throw your macbook out the window. With love - a mechanical engineer

andrewflnr

50% savings seems very optimistic. If you drill all your holes, switch once, then drive all your screws, there's only a few seconds this thing can possibly save you. Then you consider that it takes a smidge more effort to drill with this sub-optimal bit, and it's really a stretch. There would have to be some aspect of the project's assembly sequence that required you to switch multiple times.

defrost

To be honest people that do handy work regularly and value the time savings have two, three and even four drills.

I've got a rural, agricultural, mining and aviation background and since the 1970s we've worked singlely or in pairs with multiple drills, one to drill holes, another to drive screws.

If there's a big cupboard or similar on the bench it's not unknown to have seperate drills for

* thin pilot hole,

* main larger diameter hole,

* larger again counter sink hole for top of shaft to hide screw head,

* driver to put screws in.

forgetfreeman

Absolutely this. It starts by intentionally buying a drill, then getting lured by one of those tool combo deals that has another drill lurking in the pile. Then someone hears you like working with your hands and you're absolutely getting a drill for <insert gift giving occasion here>. The first time you don't have to stop and chuck a new bit mid-task you'll wonder why the hell you ever worked any other way.

dlachausse

Not only that, but most people who do a lot of woodworking have both a drill and an impact driver that they switch between as necessary.

Rury

I bet it doesn't drill as nice as a normal drill bit, especially for certain materials.

Nevermark

> 50% savings seems very optimistic. If you drill all your holes, switch once, then drive all your screws, there's only a few seconds this thing can possibly save you.

A few seconds is often the difference between doing something and not. Obviously not talking about work.

But if I have a drill, already with a drill/screw bit in it, and box of right sized screws it is going to get used anywhere a screw can make any difference at all.

People say "If all you have is a hammer, ..." For a reason!

Nobody says, "If all you have is a drill, a box of drill bits, a set of drawers with screws, ...". For a reason!

(It would be great if every decent sized box of screws came with a drill/screw bit appropriately sized for pre-drill and screw. As a hobby level crafter, who cannot always find things, those would be the boxes of screws I bought every time. Every other box of screws would become invisible to me.)

spenczar5

> It would be great if every decent sized box of screws came with a drill/screw bit appropriately sized for pre-drill and screw

This is very common. GRK, Spax, Axis (a local brand to the Seattle area), and many more. Yes, they are better!

hunter-gatherer

I've done a decent amount of remodel work and new builds. The workflow you've described rarely plays out in real jobs. This combo bit looks particularly useful for building things like decks.

ok_dad

Why not use deck screws designed to self drill? They work fine for boards you’d use on a deck.

This driver/drill bit is strictly worse than the alternatives. Most homeowners doing any building other than drilling a few holes for photo hanging will probably have bought a drill/driver pair from Ryobi or something anyways, so you don’t really need to swap bits.

mvdtnz

Would you use Philips head screws for a deck? I wouldn't. Even square drive is a pain if you need to back them out for any reason - you're sure to round out one in 20 or 30 of them, then RIP to any time you saved. I pretty much exclusively moved to star drive.

rpcope1

I can't believe people use anything other than Torx or something equivalent, especially for outside work. The difference between crappy regular wood screws and a box of GRK or Deckmate is night and day.

throwup238

Is there any reason the design can’t be adapted to a star drive? Is there not enough clearance between the points on the bit or not enough room for clearance with the extra drill flutes? Is it too flat on the head compared to phillips?

_blk

I used to think of Torx as the best until I met a French Canadian who dared me to use Robertson (square).. I did, now I'm all Robertson. The screws stick to the bit before putting them in and always come loose after. Torx acrews often sticks to the bit when they're in. I also seem to need less of a variety of sizes compared to Torx. But hey, I'll take Torx over Philipps any day.. Not sure why those are still around.

null

[deleted]

rpcope1

Given how easy it is to blow out a Phillips head with a drill and a bit that's not perfect, and given how much difference a good 135 degree jobber bit from a reputable manufacturer like Norseman makes, I can't see this being very good at either in a real world scenario.

m00x

Yeah but how many phillips heads are you buying that are carbide?

DannyBee

Anyone who cares about speed is using nailers or screw guns. Or has a drill and an impact driver.

This really just turns one problem into a bunch. I'll point out the significant ones haven't seen so far

1. It has no self-centering capability, because you've removed any split point

2. The hole diameter is massive compared to the screw head you can drive because of how it must be designed. Either you are limited in the minimum size of the fastener (IE it's bigger than you want), or the drive is smaller than you want.

Example: Let's say this thing will drill like a 1/4" inch hole and then you want to use a 5/16" fastener in that hole. You'd normally have a t-40 head on that fastener, but they literally can't. The width of just the inset torx portion (IE with no accounting for the bit needing to have a non-zero wall) is > 1/4" (it's 6.6mm), so they have to undersize the drive. Probably all the way to t-20, maybe t-25 if they are lucky.

That's insane.

There is maybe a small range of diameters that hit the right sweet spot.

3. The effective point angle here is basically unusable for anything but soft to medium hardwoods. On top of that, because of the flutes they removed, and the fact that it is hard to keep sharp, it will cause more tearout.

This will be made worse by having an effective 4 flute head instead of a 2 flute one. If this was in a drill press or a machine, it would be better than the 2 flute one, but in a drill/driver it's just going to add a lot of chatter and increase tearout.

It's the same effect that happens if you try to use a 4 flute or 6 flute countersink in a drill driver vs a one or 2 flute one. The extra flutes make it worse because you can't hold it rigidly enough

4. As it dulls, it will not just lose the ability to drill, but will start very quickly slipping when you try to drive the screw.

5. It is impossible to sharpen without custom jigs or automation.

There are useful drill+something combos, but i do think we found them all already (IE drill+taps are useful, as are drill + c'bore and drill + c'sink)

I don't think this is one of them.

steve_adams_86

I'm picturing someone holding a screw by the shank to drill it into the wall, but slipping and puncturing their hand with the bit. There should be no cutting edges with force applied in the direction of your body parts.

I might be atypical here but I rarely drive screws without a preplanned hole that's typically made in batches using a jig or machine, like a router or press. I rarely need to drive a screw directly into a random hole I just made.

If I'm constructing ad-hoc, I'm almost certainly using nails. Not only for convenience, but because they tend to be better suited to this kind of construction. An exception might be drywall screws, but even then, you've got a totally different system established for doing that.

I don't see the use case here. I'm also kind of stuck in my ways, though. I'm open to this making sense, but I'm definitely not an early adopter.

I think I might have thought I wanted this before I learned to plan my builds better.

calmbonsai

This is the industrial equivalent of DIY-why?!

FWIW, woodworkers that care about speed for these operations (mostly niche furniture assembly) do them in parallel and simply have two drivers or use nail-guns with "glue nails".

chefandy

I don’t think this are optimal for the craftspeople market. If I managed a bunch of rental properties or something and was doing quick-and-dirty fixes all day, I’d buy these if they worked. The hole size vs screw size seems weird. Also if I had to board up my windows for storms regularly. Or quick home projects outdoors. Plenty of times where speed of application and easy unscrewing are both useful.

calmbonsai

No they're not. I have, genuinely, no idea what market this targets. I concur on the hole vs screw size in the demo.

For quick boarding applications just use modern nails and a modern nail gun. They've gotten really good and really cheap.

This doesn't even speed up screw applications. Just use modern self-tapping wood screws. They've gotten really good and really cheap.

If you're doing anything structural, GRK screws are absolutely insane, reusable, and practically indestructible--though not cheap.

gorgoiler

Woodspur torx, self-piloting, self-countersinking screws:

https://cdn.axminstertools.com/media/catalog/product/cache/6...

The tip is scalloped and sharp for precise driving and piloting, the threading is also sharp, as is the profiled head which does a very good job of counter sinking into soft timber.

They are so sharp in fact that it’s very easy to accidentally drive them an inch deep. Comes wax lubricated in zinc plated or A4 marine stainless for external use.

jccooper

Cute. But 3/16" is way too large a pilot hole for any reasonable screw. I think a #24 screw, which is the largest size of wood screw, has a 3/16" pilot size... and uses a #4 Philips, which is not the bit on this thing (and is sufficiently rare I don't even have one.)

bragr

This seems like it would be a disposable item once the tip wears, at least more disposable than a regular bit. Sharpening seems like it would be difficult and time consuming, if that is possible in the first place.

__MatrixMan__

Supposing you're just drilling soft woods--like maybe you're building a deck or a fence or a shed--that could be a long time indeed.

IvyMike

The real hack is to have two drills. Seems excessive but once you do it you'll never go back.

snypher

It's so nice to have a clutch setting on the driver, and the drill at full power. I hate having to rotate the collar back and forward and inevitably overdrive screws with the wrong setting.

Edit: or even clicking that switch back and forward.

notpushkin

I think there are “smart” drills that switch modes when you change from a drill bit to a driver bit (and vice versa). Still inconvenient for frequent usage though.

rpcope1

The Milwaukee M18 drill/driver pair is perfect for this, and typically what I use. Keep the jobber bit in the drill and the put the screws in with the hex driver.

taurknaut

You can also attach them to each others bits and make them fight at the end of the job. Waste of money? Yes. A massive amount of fun for the boys? Absolutely.

silisili

Not loving this. It looks like it would walk badly on anything but the softest woods as I don't see any kind of centered tip.

Secondly, the head of a screw is by necessity much larger than the body. So you're going to end up drilling pilots too large for the screw, or else have an extremely weak bite on the head and round it out with any torque at all.

Changing bits on a modern keyless chuck takes about 5 seconds. Throw one in your lips while you use the other. Or if you're like me and find yourself a power tool hoarder, just use a separate drill or impact for each.

barbazoo

The diameter of the drill bit looks too large to be used for drilling pilot holes for screws compatible with the Philips head. Apart from Philips being a terrible choice for anything really.

snypher

I agree, exactly what screw goes into the hole that has the same diameter as the screw head? I could see maybe those plastic drywall anchors with the oversized thread, but not a conventional fastener.

jimbob45

I’m OOTL with all the Phillips hate in this thread. Is there a good reason to prefer other patterns or is it simply bandwagoning?

exmadscientist

Phillips is designed to cam out, typically resulting in damage to the fastener if the operator isn't quick enough to react.

Torx and Robertson simply do not do that. They just work and that is really worth it!

barbazoo

I have 2 different size Robertson bits but about 25 different sizes and shapes Philips bit. It’s super annoying. Use the “wrong” bit and it’s easy to strip the head. It’s just not a problem with Robertson or better yet, those star shaped ones.

andrewmcwatters

It is absolutely not bandwagoning. The torque tolerances of most Phillips head fasteners are abysmally low and most brand-name impact drivers will damage the recess compromising the fastener after installation.

It's an outright scam to use them in construction compared to Torx and Robertson which thankfully are slowly replacing them in use.