iFixit iPhone Air teardown
ifixit.com
$2 WeAct Display FS adds a 0.96-inch USB information display to your computer
cnx-software.com
Spectral Labs releases SGS-1: the first generative model for structured CAD
spectrallabs.ai
The bloat of edge-case first libraries
43081j.com
AI Was Supposed to Help Juniors Shine. Why Does It Mostly Make Seniors Stronger?
elma.dev
Representing Heterogeneous Data (2023)
journal.stuffwithstuff.com
Teen suspect surrenders in 2023 Las Vegas casino cyberattack case
casino.org
Hyperion: Minecraft game engine for custom events
hyperion.rs
In defence of swap: common misconceptions (2018)
chrisdown.name
Slavery After Abolition: Revolt on the Amelia
historytoday.com
Were RNNs all we needed? A GPU programming perspective
dhruvmsheth.github.io
Lidar, optical distance and time of flight sensors
ams-osram.com
Teardown of Apple 40W dynamic power adapter with 60W max
chargerlab.com
A revolution in English bell ringing
harpers.org
Amazon to end commingling after years of complaints from brands and sellers
modernretail.co
Learning Languages with the Help of Algorithms
johndcook.com
A brief history of threads and threading
eclecticlight.co
Escapee pregnancy test frogs colonised Wales for 50 years (2019)
bbc.com
There are many apps that have utilized formal methods in an attempt to teach languages as optimally as possible. But Duolingo is still the leader in language learning. Why? Language learning is an emotional process. Every word you can bring to mind likely has some specific memories tied to them, from another time and place. So even though Duolingo is far from optimal in terms of how and when to present new items to learn, it is close to optimal in vibes, and apparently in the market of language learning this is what consumers prioritize over all else. I believe it is for good reason. Whoever displaces Duolingo will do so not because they teach more efficiently, but because they improve on embedding particular emotions and sentiments into the lessons.