Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

HN

$2 WeAct Display FS adds a 0.96-inch USB information display to your computer

cnx-software.com

Ultrasonic Chef's Knife

seattleultrasonics.com

Teardown of Apple 40W Dynamic Power Adapter with 60W Max (A3365)

Designing NotebookLM

jasonspielman.com

Knitted Anatomy

knitted-anatomy.at

A brief history of threads and threading

eclecticlight.co

A revolution in English bell ringing

Solving a wooden puzzle using Haskell

glocq.github.io

After Babel Fish: The promise of cheap translations at the speed of the Web

hedgehogreview.com

I'm Not a Robot

sethmlarson.dev

Show HN: I Parallelized RNN Training from O(T) to O(log T) Using CUDA

dhruvmsheth.github.io

Escapee pregnancy test frogs colonised Wales for 50 years (2019)

Running a 80×25 DOS-Style Console Is Possible After All

changelog.complete.org

Images over DNS

FLX1s phone is launched

Philips announces digital pathology scanner with native DICOM JPEG XL output

MapSCII – World map in terminal

Vapor chamber tech keeps iPhone 17 Pro cool

spectrum.ieee.org

Cormac McCarthy's tips on how to write a science paper (2019) [pdf]

Evals in 2025: going beyond simple benchmarks to build models people can use

Living microbial cement supercapacitors with reactivatable energy storage

PYREX vs. pyrex: What's the difference?

Show HN: Math2Tex – Convert handwritten math and complex notes to LaTeX text

Show HN: I Parallelized RNN Training from O(T) to O(log T) Using CUDA

Show HN: I Parallelized RNN Training from O(T) to O(log T) Using CUDA

1 comments

·September 18, 2025

DoctorOetker

Is it not much simpler to parallelize by having different "readers" (using the same model parameters/weights) process different parts of the corpus in parallel? reader A is reading book A, while reader B is reading book B etc...?

Is there a deeper reason why more complicated parallelization as in the OP or the article it references is more desirable?