Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

Show HN: I converted my notebook into a searchable database of IT keywords

card_zero

* Successfully looked up RLHF (reinforcement learning from human feedback)

* Failed when looking up NIH (not invented here)

Hmm. Would you mind devoting the rest of your life to making this dictionary comprehensive, and keeping it updated?

Slightly smaller request: could you make it possible to select and copy the definitions?

jurajstefanic

I’ll do my best to keep it updated regularly! I’ve added the copy functionality now to each definition entry - no need for that extra step of selecting!

card_zero

Well, I didn't want to copy the whole thing, I wanted to select and copy it myself, as is standard and expected. I don't want a handy search button that sends me to google, either, since I don't use google. If you keep on helping me to do things I didn't want to, I'll have a user experience.

wizzwizz4

  :root body { user-select: auto; }
Slap this in a userstyle, and it'll override lines 545–546 of the stylesheet, restoring the expected behaviour.

staplung

Great work. Love the austere style.

Nit: don't think you need to prefix "database" with "searchable". If it's a DB, searchability is implied.

atmanactive

This is great. Thanks for this.

The only thing I'm missing is the automatic dark mode (respecting operating system's dark/light theme). If you want I could add that in a pull request.

jurajstefanic

Thanks! Great suggestion. Feel free to open a pull request and add it.

LoganDark

Doesn't seem to have "RTFM" (Read The Fucking/Friendly Manual)

redeux

That was the first thing I searched for too

jurajstefanic

Refresh and it's there!

perdomon

Love the neo-brutalism look. What do you think about crowd-sourcing the glossary or creating a submission form for new terms?

jurajstefanic

Thanks! Added a submission form for the new words and definitions (also in the neo-brutalism style).

As for crowd-sourcing the glossary, that is also planned. I just need to structure the existing entries first, and it's good to go! It will be published as part of the GitHub repository.

kagevf

Maybe consider adding a highlight to the search term in the (filtered) text.

jurajstefanic

Great idea! Adding it now.

tro2102

Cool!

nit: you've got a casing mismatch between Devops and DevOps

jurajstefanic

Nice catch. Fixed!

call

"o'reilly"