Comic Code Reviews
9 comments
·November 20, 2025JonathanAquino
treetalker
This could be a fun way to educate the judge about why my opposing counsel's position is laughably wrong.
Sadly, the fun would end with a reprimand or sanctions order. Cf. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43866303 ("Don't watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits").
Might work for bringing associate attorneys up to speed in a new case, or for teaching concepts to law students, though!
ChrisMarshallNY
I think it’s a fun idea.
Not sure if it would be used, though. Being on HN front page helps.
It would also have to contain a lot of content, and be indexed well.
namanyayg
Interesting idea but unfortunately the given example comic makes very little sense.
It was difficult to parse even as someone who's familiar with these concepts, and I think it will hurt more than help any newbies.
joshdavham
You actually might be on to something... AI aside, it's often a good idea to include visuals in a PR such as diagrams.
But having something like a comic where it's both visual and communicative in a more conversational/narrative way could prove pretty effective. Also if you can throw some humour in there, it could potentially add even more comprehensibility, etc.
Thanks for sharing!
qwertytyyuu
Looks like a fun inclusion
antonvs
It seems to me the level this comic is at is such that anyone who needs an aid like this would not be capable of providing a meaningful review on the pull request.
If the goal is to encourage rubber-stamping by bystanders, it might help.
BurningFrog
It's valuable to make a difficult task easier, even for those who could do the task without the help.
antonvs
I'd rather just have a high-level summary in English for that.
This seems to take dumbing-down beyond any sensible level.
I’ve been experimenting with a way to make code reviews more understandable - turning tricky pull requests into short comic strips.
The blog post shows an example generated from a real PR: summarizing the changes, anthropomorphizing the components, and making the flow visually obvious. It’s meant to help reviewers grasp intent quickly and make reviews a bit more fun.
Curious whether others have tried visual or narrative aids in their review process, and whether this could be practical for real teams.