Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

The EU made Apple adopt new Wi-Fi standards, and now Android can support AirDrop

joejohnson

I wonder if it's related to Apple's change from AWDL to Wi-Fi Aware, but AirDrop seems much more reliable on iOS 26. I can send to multiple people at once and they often all succeed, but most importantly, if one transfer fails or is cancelled, I can retry and it works. In older versions of iOS, a failed transfer seemed to block all future attempts until the phone was restarted.

TheJoeMan

Have you tried the NFC-bumping the tops of the iPhones together yet? So far I’ve had superb success rate on iOS18.

fragmede

the weird one for me is that if I hit share, and then hit the airdrop target, it doesn't work, but if go into airdrop and then select the same target, then works. Apple, fix your shit, yo.

MBCook

So they forced Apple to drop an Apple proprietary thing in favor of… a Wi-Fi standard Apple helped develop specifically to replace their proprietary thing.

Not quite as strong as the headline makes the case sound.

usrnm

Apple also helped develop USB C more than a decade ago, they still had to be forced to actually use it in their phones. There is no contradiction here

llm_nerd

Users all got to complain that the EU are the meanies responsible for their old wires and chargers and accessory no longer being compatible, but it seems infinitely more likely that Apple was going to adopt USB-C on largely the same schedule even if the EU didn't intercede.

To be clear, Apple had already moved their laptops and computers to USB-C -- long in advance of almost any one else -- and had moved their iPad Pros to USB-C, building out the accessory set supporting the same, years before the EU decree. Pretty convenient when they get to blame the EU for their smartphones making the utterly inevitable move.

dickersnoodle

It's conceivably politically incorrect to use this reference, but Apple was begging the EU not to throw them into that briar patch.

icehawk

People spent a whole decade complaining about the iPod dock -> Lightning change.

I'd wait to blame the EU also.

ricw

Apple probably wouldn’t have changed to usbc for their phones. Lightning was a mobile phone / other development, whilst usbc and its contributions came from their Mac department.

They did not like each others standards. I know Apple engineers working on the phone who dislike the change even up to this day…

frizlab

Absolutely. It is excessively obvious and I don’t understand how not much more of a common take that is.

Nextgrid

Apple was forced to upstream the standard because the writing was on the wall so may as well preempt it.

It’d also a benefit for Apple, since once upstreamed it shares the maintenance burden across all participants.

null

[deleted]

lysace

The headline is 100% correct.

CharlesW

The EU: Sacrificing constituents' privacy rights with one hand, while courageously fighting for the sacred right to AirDrop with the other.

bigyabai

Don't worry, the United States is always eager to prove that you can neglect both consumer rights and user privacy at the same time.

CharlesW

This wasn't a "meanwhile, the U.S. is good" post. Let's hope this massive AirDrop "win" eases the sting of the rights that the EU is eroding.

k310

I'll be happy when Airdrop works reliably on Apple equipment.

It can't reliably work between two adjacent rooms in my home without arm-waving.

A hundred or thousand mile trip through iCloud works tons better.

star-glider

I'm libertarian, but I have to say watching the EU torment Apple has been delightful and one of the stronger arguments for muscular regulatory action.

The USB-C thing just made everything better. It cost Apple basically nothing---maybe a few million/year of profit, which for a company that's worth $3 trillion is nothing, and it made my and many other people's lives quite a bit more convenient.

Same with this Airdrop thing, and same with RCS (although there's some reporting that RCS had more to do with China than the EU).

Eventually, someone is going to break open iMessage, and poor Apple will actually have to compete again for customers. Maybe they'll innovate something more interesting than Airpods Ultra Mega Pro Max or a thinner phone.

fingerlocks

Apple made major contributions to USB-C and adopted it a decade ago in their MacBooks. They were committed to lightning for 10 years starting in 2012-ish, so usb-c was likely inevitable in iOS devices.

However I would preferred a backwards compatibility lightning 2.0 upgrade. Cleaning a usb-c port is a huge pain and they are more prone to pocket lint clogging than lightning.

ebbi

While I really like the convenience of not having multiple different cables to charge my devices when travelling, I agree with you on cleaning the usb-c port. In that respect, the lightning design was a lot more elegant and made more sense for a pocketable device.

lsaferite

Plastic dental picks work great for cleaning USB-C ports.

tracerbulletx

You're a libertarian but regulatory intervention made everything about the market better and a better world for everyone involved with a relatively small change that was being stubbornly refused by a company for a small marginal benefit to themselves?

star-glider

Sure, because I think that, ultimately excessive regulation stifles innovation. I mean, heck, the EU is looking to effectively dismantle GDPR because they're worried that it's going to cause them to miss out on the AI boom.

My point was just that Apple is such an outrageously bad actor (and the USB-C and Airdrop rules so beneficial) that these rules were getting even a very pro-market person like me to at least be open to the idea of regulating some of these out-of-control giants.

CharlesW

We call them "LINO"s.

JAlexoid

Or... You know... We also like watching one giant corporation that benefits from distinctly authoritarian policies get wrecked by another authoritarian entity to the benefit of better competition in the market.

But apparently unless you're a suckup to the authoritarian entity that you like is now a LINO.

firefax

Left libertarianism is compatible with such views.

Basically, libertarian on social issues paired with a preference for a decentralized economy, as opposed to a "tankie" (Stalinist) style centrally planned economy.

mensetmanusman

The usb C to hdmi adapter is 100x less reliable than the lightning to hdmi adapter (having talked to many that used both).

Not sure why that is, but something to ponder.

thinkindie

> If I had to guess why neither of Google’s Quick Share posts mentions Wi-Fi interoperability standards or the DMA, it may be because Google has been complaining about various aspects of the law and its enforcement since before it was even passed

This is telling a lot about US companies complaining about EU laws.

IshKebab

The DMA also forces them to have interoperable end-to-end encrypted group video call support in like 5 years or something insane. No idea how that's supposed to happen!

mensetmanusman

Will this help or hinder the CCP’s strong arming of Apple to hinder airdrop?

null

[deleted]

eastbound

So what is it? Comanagement between EU representatives and Apple employees? It looks like the German model where unions co-manage the companies.

On the paper it looks great, but the problem is the EU is not necessarily representing its citizens. It’s great for my Apple products, but I’m also paying for an entire lavish class of superior citizen in Brussels who implement laws written by lobbies.

lxgr

> the problem is the EU is not necessarily representing its citizens.

Yes, EU citizens probably absolutely love not being able to conveniently share files between Android and iOS.

> I’m also paying for an entire lavish class of superior citizen in Brussels who implement laws written by lobbies.

What lobbies, in this particular case? Google? Samsung?