Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

Online Safety Act – shutdowns and site blocks

b800h

What's frustrating me about this is that theoretically this list should include every MUD and BBS, if they don't want to get in trouble. It's a horrible law, which forces people into the pockets of the largest sites which can afford to do the age verification.

Speaking as a Brit, I wish Wikipedia would just go black for the UK. That might focus some minds.

cs02rm0

> Speaking as a Brit, I wish Wikipedia would just go black for the UK. That might focus some minds.

Likewise. People (organisations/companies), as far as possible, shouldn't be pandering to this stuff, it's not the answer, it doesn't help them or us.

cm2187

In fact that would likely devastate Labour’s already slim chances of reelection. And would make the argument for repealing that idiotic law wholesale something else than “let my constituents watch porn”

silon42

Even if they don't, maybe go black for all weekends.

cm2187

That wouldn’t address their liability.

RaSoJo

> bsky.app | @greg.org on Bluesky https://bsky.app/profile/greg.org/post/3lvt3mjvskk2i Reported: 07 August, 2025 at 19:53 Shut down on: 07 August, 2025 Geoblocking due to OSA Statue of |david behind age verification filter

So, going forward, will similar pieces of art be blocked in the British Museum as well? Like physically?

fenykep

Or you can simply block people under 18 from the museum. That's what Hungary did - no minors allowed in places where homosexuality could be on display.

fiftyacorn

I like it - request that greek statues cover up in case children see

cm2187

Or start breaking statues penises again

gorgoiler

[delayed]

coldtea

Yeah, the government that let the strets go rampant with crime, that they don't even bother tracking anymore, is concerned about the people's "online safety"...

disruptiveink

We have a near perfect system for finding the location of phone thieves, yet the police will not go and knock on the doors of criminals even when explicitly shown proof of "this is where the thief is currently".

jama211

I always hear this but it seems to mostly be made up? Like yeah, there’s crime in London, but less than in most European or American cities… seems like a narrative that keeps being pushed without merit

cs02rm0

It's a slightly mixed picture. Knife crime is one area that's been trending up for 10 years now. Shoplifting is at a 20 year high. Fraud is up. Firearms offences are roughly level.

But criminal damage is down. Of course, if you call the police for criminal damage, everyone knows they won't turn up and you'll just get a crime number, so unless you're claiming on insurance you're probably less and less likely to report it.

We shouldn't be aiming for London (with 200 phones stolen every day as it is) to reach the level of the worst European or American cities.

password321

Potential energy vs kinetic energy. Just because it is not in motion doesn't mean the potential is not there, that's why everyone has Amazon Ring in front of their homes and won't let their kids alone in the park. Relying on police to deter crime or relying on police reports to understand the current crime landscape is beyond naive.

randomNumber7

They don't want you to be able to talk about their incompetence or organize protests.

watwut

I think maybe if people stopped fear mongering about crime where there is no actually massive raise of crime, there would be overall less paranoia.

rapsey

[flagged]

__loam

The idea that the uk is a remotely dangerous country is probably why it's now seeing more and more nanny state laws. It's also probably part of why Brexit happened.

rapsey

Any country or city can be made to look safe if crime is not prosecuted or policed.

ascorbic

This is a confusing mix of sites that have decided to geoblock UK users because they don't want to deal with the regulations (fair enough) but also ones that have age verification and no geoblock

lblissett

I’m in the uk. No vpn. I tried several of these links and they all worked for me…

Is there any verification on submissions to this?

diordiderot

sites have been allowed to estimate age based on account age and digital fingerprinting.

esskay

That might also be the case but some things on that list arent blocked at all in the UK (yet). It doesn't appear to be actually checked and anyone can submit a link and it just gets added from the looks of it.

santiagobasulto

EDIT: I was wrong in this comment, I thought it was blocked but the owners decided to take it down.

Original comment follows: They blocked irish.session.nz: "Resources for learning Irish music by ear". This is either a mistake or a very early example of a political abuse of the OSA. Both are wrong of course and prove what a stupid and concerning thing OSA truly is.

nickweb

They didn't block it. The site owners have chosen to not show the site to UK users for Legal Reasons.

octo888

A bit like choosing to give up your wallet with a gun to your head

A ridiculous analogy but not entirely

miohtama

If I am right it is the opposite. It's because website owners block the UK IP addresses, as otherwise they could face criminal charges unless they buy an expensive compliance-as-a-service solution to check the age of all visitors and hire lawyers to craft "compliance policy" Ofcom can read. Otherwise you have a criminal liability.

Think it as a bit like GDPR but 1) much more expensive 2) with criminal liability 3) Makes even less sense than GDPR as it does nothing to prevent harm for minors 4) derimental for user experience and users.

"Funnily enough" the companies who lobbied for Online Safety Act, and former Ofcom employees, are now selling age verification check services and compliance services related to Online Safety Act. They have pretty good profit margins there, making even Google and Facebook look poor.

More here:

https://x.com/moo9000/status/1950866445186818209

santiagobasulto

You are right, my bad.

perihelions

Some similar discussions from earlier this year,

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43152154 ("In memoriam (onlinesafetyact.co.uk)"—147 comments)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42433044 ("Lfgss shutting down 16th March 2025 (day before Online Safety Act is enforced) (lfgss.com)"—555 comments)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43152178 ("Lobsters blocking UK users because of the Online Safety Act"—87 comments)

blisstonia

Lobsters hasn't been blocked here in the UK.

dan-robertson

The data quality here seems poor, eg it lists reddit.com as having shut down, which is clearly false. I think some list like this would probably come across better with some curation so it isn’t largely a list of unsympathetic porn sites and no-name blogs being blocked to spite the UK.

a5c11

Under the main link (the big, bold one) there is a link to what precisely has been blocked. Apparently, it's enough for them to just geoblock specific subreddits, like: dark humour, bowel surgeries, some porn stuff, etc.

pjc50

Note that this is not just a UK thing but also in several US states: https://avpassociation.com/4271-2/

haritha-j

True, but certianly doesn't make me feel any better about it. If we started getting school shootings in the UK, and someone said ah but the US has that too, I wouldn't feel much better.

j1elo

> reddit discussion about a type of bowel surgery

Are they really going to register individual topics for Reddit?

Wait,

> Post on social media website X claiming that content relating to protests has been age-gated due to the Online Safety Act.

Now we're reporting individual tweets?!?

Popeyes

I think it is based on tags, so if you tag stuff as NSFW then you get an age challenge.

hdgvhicv

The Reddit link works fine with old.reddit. New Reddit has always required an account for nsfw subs.

xn--yt9h

On this note, how does this work? Do they terminate TLS now?

II2II

Judging from how most of the reports are phrased, the shutdowns and blocks are initiated by the content providers. Some are for legal reasons, some because they are legitimately concerned that they may be covered by the act, and some to protest the act. Those who are claiming that the government shut down these sites are spreading disinformation. It is more accurate to describe it as a chilling effect.

coldtea

>Those who are claiming that the government shut down these sites are spreading disinformation. It is more accurate to describe it as a chilling effect.

Same difference. Making a pedantic distinction to mud the waters is the real disinformation.

diordiderot

It's been said before but worth reiterating, this is about being able to censor content that threatens the legitimacy of the state.

Should be noted that protest footage and anti-immigration content require age verification.

At the same time 16 year olds received the right to vote.

Certain minority demographics are very good at 'organizing' voters.

The heads of household will ensure their wives and children vote correctly