Benchmarking GPT-5 on 400 Real-World Code Reviews
qodo.ai
Linear sent me down a local-first rabbit hole
bytemash.net
Flipper Zero dark web firmware bypasses rolling code security
rtl-sdr.com
Writing a storage engine for Postgres: An in-memory table access method (2023)
notes.eatonphil.com
OpenAI's new open-source model is basically Phi-5
seangoedecke.com
GPT-5: Key characteristics, pricing and system card
simonwillison.net
A Love Letter to My Future Employer
catzkorn.dev
Over engineering my homelab so I don't pay cloud providers
ergaster.org
Ask HN: Has any of the Pivotal Tracker replacement attempts succeeded?
Encryption made for police and military radios may be easily cracked
wired.com
Achieving 10,000x training data reduction with high-fidelity labels
research.google
Exit Tax: Leave Germany before your business gets big
eidel.io
The Paranoid Style in American Politics (1964)
harpers.org
Building Bluesky comments for my blog
natalie.sh
How AI conquered the US economy: A visual FAQ
derekthompson.org
Benchmark Framework Desktop Mainboard and 4-node cluster
github.com
I mean succeeded in replicating it, not necessarily as a business.
It doesn't seem so. I tested all I could find, LiteTracker seems the best, but still extremely buggy even in the initial demo project changing task status fails. The rest appears either half-finished, untrustworthy or has a very sketchy interface. But would really like to be surprised.
I am very rarely willing to pay for software and this is one case I really want to, but cannot find anything.
This thing kinda feeds my pet theory that the art of making functional software has been lost by late 2010s. People say Linear is fast but it's nothing compared to how well Pivotal worked. Any half-skilled indie dev could have made a killing on making a good replacement, but no one has been able to?