Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

“Reading Rainbow” was created to combat summer reading slumps

LongjumpingCat

This brought back some memories. It’s kind of amazing how shows like this made reading feel fun instead of something you had to do. Just stories, imagination and a bit of magic, sometimes that’s all it takes to get a kid hooked on books.

CSMastermind

Growing up Wishbone connected with me a lot more.

Looking back on the list of Reading Rainbow books: https://knowtea.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/rea...

I can't say I've read many of them.

With that said, I miss the trend of reading being so heavily emphasized in youth culture. Dolly Parton, free Pizza Hut, the accelerated reader program. I'm really grateful I grew up in the 90s.

brendoelfrendo

Wishbone was a good show, but I think it occupies a different niche. Wishbone was about adapting the classics, and each episode was more of a production vs Reading Rainbow, which was formatted more to introduce kids to contemporary age-appropriate reading by focusing on picture books and excursions to thematically connected places.

The only downside is that Wishbone holds up better to a modern rewatch in comparison, as opposed to how RR is very much of its time. But that's ok, too; someone needs to inspire kids to be adventurous with their reading so that they can go out and find the next classics.

dehrmann

I'm torn. I see lots of value in reading (for both kids and adults!), but at some point, there also needs to be emphasis on doing.

aspenmayer

That was a well done show for kids. LeVar Burton can read a book better than me, and I am not ashamed to admit it. He made learning accessible, fun, and cool.

twoodfin

He also has that rare Fred Rogers-esque gift of talking in a way children understand without talking down to them.

Not unheard of in today’s tap-obsessed world of YouTube Kids & streaming apps, but much harder to find.

aspenmayer

He’s a compelling speaker and onscreen talent, I agree. He’s using his superpowers for good, whatever they are. Being able to connect through a screen wasn’t normalized back then. Educational content needed that personal touch. I think it makes all the difference.

burnt-resistor

Whatever works, I guess. It made a difference, although it was corny somewhere between `Punky Brewster` and `Captain Planet`. Vintage `Sesame Street` is legit cool.

monkeyelite

> LeVar Burton can read a book better than me, and I am not ashamed to admit it.

This is a weird comment. He’s a professional actor. I hope he does

aspenmayer

He makes the hard thing look easy. This wasn’t a backhanded compliment but a genuine one. He isn’t acting per se, but he does voice act the stories. It was audiobooks and ASMR sorta before those things were cool. He does a fantastic job with the words on the page and also goes on-site to film IRL things from the books. It’s a simple premise and it works. It doesn’t have to be surprising to be enjoyable and engaging.

pfannkuchen

Why are you looking for a hyper stimulus? Man didn’t evolve in an environment where stories were told by people who’d won a massive intertribe tournament of story telling ability. Stories were told by family.

If child requires hyper stimulus to be engaged in this area, suspect other hyper stimulus present.

jimbob45

I was bored to tears and I read more than the average kid. I liked the aesthetic though and I wanted to like it because it seemed wholesome. I’ve always suspected RR is one of those shows that everyone knows they should like so they all talk it up as if they did like it. Kinda like Rust.

plemer

Or maybe many did genuinely enjoy RR but you just weren’t the target audience? If it was created to combat the summer reading slump, it likely wasn’t targeting already avid readers.

FWIW, though, my experience was similar to yours: I read a ton and loved the feel of the show, but the actual content was a little slow.

aspenmayer

I agree that it’s the feel of the show. I grew up with 3 free to air channels, and one of them was a PBS station. The content was better than the competition or the VHS tape collection, or replaying one of the video games.

bagels

I always immediately turned it off when I was a kid. I appreciate its purpose now, but loathed it when I was in the target audience.

aspenmayer

I genuinely liked it even though I could read fine. It was an excuse to use the tv when I might not have a good reason to use it instead of someone else otherwise and I enjoyed the content well enough even if I was a couple years older than the intended audience. The public broadcasting shows of that era were weirdly good imo, with Mr Rogers and Shirley Lewis doing puppets, but wholesome too.

Ghost Writer was ahead of its time and deserves a post of its own.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghostwriter_(1992_TV_series)

> The series revolves around a multiethnic group of friends from Brooklyn who solve neighborhood crimes and mysteries as a team of youth detectives with the help of a ghost named Ghostwriter. Ghostwriter can communicate with children only by manipulating whatever text and letters he can find and using them to form words and sentences.

> Ghostwriter producer and writer Kermit Frazier revealed in a 2010 interview that Ghostwriter was a runaway slave during the American Civil War. He taught other slaves how to read and write and was killed by slave catchers and their dogs. His spirit was kept in the book that Jamal discovers and opens in the pilot episode, freeing the ghost.

Wishbone has costumes and a dog for your dramatic re-enactments of books with a dog actor in the lead role. This is crazy town, and I’m here for it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wishbone_(TV_series)

postalcoder

The entire PBS slate of shows was elite. Very little did I know at the time how initiative-driven it was (a great thing). To me where in the world was Carmen Sandiego was a fun trivia game. To the creators, they were trying to address the issue of americans not knowing where the country was on a map.

fracus

I honestly just loved the theme song and the good vibes, but yeah, I didn't really watch it watch it.

ChrisArchitect

Reminds of another 1980s reading incentive thing, tho during the schoolyear not summer: Pizza Hut's Book It!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizza_Hut#Book_It!

aspenmayer

Read books, get free pizza you want, not the pizza they serve at school. Whoever invented this is a genius. I still regret losing the holographic Book It! pin I had, but I can probably find another one if I look.

RandallBrown

It was sort of Ronald Reagan that invented it.

throwing_away

It really felt like propaganda as a kid.

Made me think reading was probably a scam.

esseph

Sure was buddy

Big Book out to get u

(How the fuck did you know what "propaganda" was before you could even read btw?)

vintermann

Ask a parent! Kids can be very wary of attempts to "shape" them. Of course they're not going to know the word propaganda, but the instinct to detect manipulation (and react negatively to it) goes deep.

TeMPOraL

Indeed. Also, small kids are excellent bullshit detectors. They can tell when they're being given non-sequiturs, or explanations are inconsistent, and they (rightfully) see this as problem and are confused when such things come from sources they trust (e.g. parents).

throwing_away

That was just the vibe.

It was mandatory watching by the state education program. It had product placement and a clear message.

I mean, I feel like it would take more education to not see it as propaganda.

I didn't like The Magic Schoolbus either though. Same reason.

Oh, and Scholastic everything.

sitzkrieg

i felt like a lot of my teachers kept it handy in the "fucking hungover" pocket too

tclancy

Well, good work avoiding that scam. I guess. Does this make you Goofus or Gallanyt?

omeid2

I am always fascinated by this degree of assurance and absolute lack of scepticism.

In what way, do you think, a show can have no room for critical viewing? Does being related to "reading or books" sufficient for such unquestionable and noncritical acceptance? Or was something else about it that makes it so cocksure good?

anniedethomasis

It's simply the left-wing mindset. Individuality, including one's own ability to question others and think critically, is shunned and suppressed. Collectivist organizations and entities (including government, academia, publishers and the mass media, doctors, the pharmaceutical industry, etc.) are considered to be infallible. Anyone and anything questioning the collectivist "wisdom" of the moment is met with overt hostility.

etchalon

It sure was neat when people aspired to help kids learn instead of being completely focused on them not learning the wrong thing.

monkeyelite

I think if you back and watch these 90s PBS shows you’ll find they are also very overt in promoting their ideas.

fsckboy

[flagged]

monkeyelite

> while children have been fed increasing amounts of what you think they should know by people you agree with, their actually reading scores have been declining and declining and declining

Why are you having a disguised political debate? Please state claims clearly.

null

[deleted]

Larrikin

Mr. Fuckboy, why are you pretending like the very same government funded network that created shows like Reading Rainbow isn't being gutted by politics. I assume with your user name this is a serious opinion to be taken seriously.

ajuc

I wonder how many public libraries are there in US.

In Poland every gmina (which is like a collection of a few villages - around 10k people and 10x10 km) have a public library. It's how I learned to love reading books - there was no internet yet, TV had like 3 channels, and I was on vacations bored to hell. So I went to the library and started borrowing random books. I didn't had to drive anywhere or ask my parents - it was just a short walk.

I especially love the small countryside libraries where you don't need to ask the librarian for a book you want - you walk among the shelves and look for the books yourself. Back in 80s/90s most books in such libraries were hand-covered with gray packing-paper covers and had the author and title written by the librarian on that. So you didn't even had images on the cover to let you know what the book was about. It was a complete surprise every time. Through 3 summer vacations I went through half the library, even trying some Harlequins or "collected works of Lenin" :) (not a very good read BTW). Mostly I looked for fantasy and sci-fi, but that was like 5 shelves out of 50, so I tried everything eventually. And I learnt to love reading ever since.

RandallBrown

The US public library system is very big. There are over 17,000 libraries and that doesn't include the almost 100,000 libraries that are in schools.

My city (Seattle, a pretty large US city) has 27 public libraries. I only live a few blocks from the closest one but could fairly easily walk to at least 2 more.

ajuc

> 17,000 libraries

It doesn't seem like "A lot" for a country the size of US TBH.

Poland has 7541 public libraries. Which is 1 per 41 km^2, but of course big cities have many libraries, so the actual distance is larger in the countryside. But it's a number.

17000 libraries in US is like one per 580 km^2.

And yes every school has one too, there's 35 000 schools. But many of these are very small libraries that mostly carry mandatory lectures for school + some classic books. In my village the school library sucked.

I lived in a village of 500 people and had a library within 5 minute walk.

Tallain

Going by land area isn't a great metric, since the US has a great deal of unpopulated or sparsely populated space. Per capita might be better, but not by much. But if you go "per city," the US has around 19,000 incorporate areas. So 17k libraries to 19k incorporated areas (cities, towns, villages, designated census areas, etc.), might be better metric.

burnt-resistor

I guess one needs to consider the US is geographically much larger and most land doesn't actually contain people. Considering the density is wiser, but even still. Libraries per occupied area still isn't a good metric. There is no good metric.

What's more important is the qualitative offerings and impact:

1. Spectrum of a. most common services and collections offered everywhere to b. the most comprehensive of those offered by a specific library.

2. What people can do at them: read, research subjects, borrow things, accomplish tasks, host meetings, etc.

This is very hard to measure and not something a business person running the government "like a business" would understand.

pfannkuchen

That’s really convenient, you’ll have a great place to hang out nearby if you ever become homeless.

pfannkuchen

Is gmena a typo or does Polish seriously have “gm” as a digraph? I have seen a reasonable amount of written Polish but I’ve never noticed “gm” before. That strikes me as really reaching, get a different alphabet, already.

MandieD

Even Germany has Gmünd: Schwäbisch Gmünd, Georgensgmünd…

ajuc

"Gmina" is correct. It's the lowest administrative unit in Poland.

There's a few other words with "gm", like "gmerać" (to fiddle with sth), "gmin" (plebs, common people - same root word as gmina I'd imagine), "gmach" (a huge building, usually of some public institution).

It's not a digraph tho, it's just pronounced as "g" and then "m"?

I'm like 99% sure it's a German loanword. Most of city/administration/building language in Polish comes from German - dach (roof), szyba (glass pane), rynek (main market square), ratusz (city hall), burmistrz (city mayor), rynsztok (gutter), etc.

All through middle ages Poland imported lots of germanic settlers and had them build whole new towns from scratch in Poland in exchange for tax breaks. There's a town called "Niemcy" (Germans/Mutes) like 10 km from where I live :), and there's a village called "Dys" nearby.

What's the problem with using latin script for gm by the way?

MandieD

As someone who speaks German but not Polish, “Gemeinde” was the first thing that came to mind seeing that “gmina” is a collection of rural villages, because that’s what the smallest incorporated settlements here are called (at least in Bavaria). Gemeinde -> Markt -> Stadt

cyberax

> I wonder how many public libraries are there in US.

A _lot_ of them (nearly 125000 about 250 people per library on average). And you can do inter-library loans, and you can check out DVDs and BluRays.

xrd

[flagged]

seizethecheese

Why post this if you know it'll be downvoted? Seriously not in the spirit of a good message board participant.

heckintime

[flagged]