iPhones were being stolen off porches right after delivery, and now we know how
67 comments
·March 21, 2025kelnos
wodenokoto
And even when you are asked to sign, it usually goes like this:
"Sign here"
"What is it? Who is the recipient?"
"Just sign"
Like, you don't know what you've signed for until after signing for it.
stevage
Still, handing the package to a person that was inside the house is much better odds than leaving it outside.
bitshiftfaced
Reminds me of places that tell you something by speaking to you, and then they want you to sign a digital pad. What does that prove? All you have is a digital signature that will presumably be placed next to some digital text.
joshstrange
> Drivers are overworked and have too many deliveries on their plate. They're not going to bother to get signatures.
Yeah, I don’t hold this against them at all. My USPS delivery driver asked me the other day if he could just leave packages requiring a signature on my porch going forward and I told him that was fine.
I have cameras, I work from home, we don’t have porch pirates in this area (or at least in it’s never happened in the last 5 years I’ve been here).
On the other hand, I don’t trust FedEx/UPS at all. I had a Steam Deck stolen in-transit (an empty box was delivered to my porch) and then I had another Steam Deck stolen from a pickup box (I assume stolen by a driver, not from the box directly). The first one I was able to prove and get a free replacement. The second one was something I couldn’t prove and I ate the loss (~$600 IIRC, I keep trying to forget it). I’ll never trust a dropbox again with anything expensive. Arguably I should have been smarter but up till that point I’d returned 10+ $1000+ iPhones the same way without issue.
OptionOfT
When you buy something online in the USA, the responsibility of the shipper ends once they hand it to the shipping company. At that moment it is your (the customer's) responsibility.
Which is weird, as you, the customer, don't have any leverage in enforcing any behavior of the shipping company (like make sure package is signed for). You can't even select them.
Apple for example charges you $9 for expedited shipping, which is essentially Uber delivery. But when the delivery person takes off with your $1,200 phone they don't have to replace it. It is on you: https://law.stackexchange.com/a/73842
When this whole thing is flipped around, where the sender is responsible until the buyer actually has it in their hands the whole system all of the sudden becomes incentivized to minimize losses.
(sidenote: it is a disgrace that Stackoverflow doesn't allow you to turn off auto-sharing of your ID when you share a link).
darreninthenet
And this is the situation in the UK - until it is in the hands of the buyer, the seller is wholly responsible for the item and delivering it to you.
Consequently, you only ever really see this kind of blase delivery from Amazon, who I guess are rich enough to absorb the cost.
switch007
> Consequently, you only ever really see this kind of blase delivery from Amazon
Sweet innocent child, so lucky never to have suffered (edit: the low cost UK courier) Hermes. Their definition of delivered to you regularly includes left in a bush 3 streets over at a random address
Your first paragraph is totally correct and I wish more people stopped wasting so much energy chasing couriers when it's not their job. However, there is a certain reality when people expect free or <£3 delivery costs
qingcharles
I lost my CashApp account because I ordered something with my debit card and it was delivered somewhere else who eventually handed it back and redelivered to the merchant who kept it.
I asked CashApp to step in and refund me and they said "Look chum, the FedEx ticket says DELIVERED".. and I'm like "Yes, but not to me" and they said "Yeah we get that, but our policy states if its DELIVERED it's over with. How about we just terminate your CashApp account for complaining?"
joachimma
For a while I thought you meant Hermes the luxury brand tossed your stuff in the bushes. Apparently there is a delivery company under the same name.
Nextgrid
Legal liability might not apply in the US. But card network rules still apply, and as far as I know even in the US those still very much require the merchant to ensure the goods are delivered as a condition of keeping their money.
Disputes/chargebacks is the very last remnant of "consumer protection" in the US that actually works - which is why nobody with money is actually incentivized to spread good words about it, and as a result it's not common knowledge even on HN.
switch007
Weird? That's WILD that it's not even the courier's responsibility. Like the law just pretends the courier is the customer's agent or something (isn't it the seller with the contract with the courier?)
Ajay-p
Really it goes back on to the seller. Because if I don't get my item, I'm going to dispute the charge on my credit card. Eventually, someone pays, but not me.
dawnerd
Even worse, you often have zero say in what courier a merchant uses!
Philadelphia
Requiring a signature, as the article suggests, doesn’t help. The delivery people just ignore it. My iPhone was left outside despite requiring a signature. I changed my schedule to be home when it was delivered. They didn’t even knock on the door before they left it.
f33d5173
I bought a ~$500 item from amazon the other day. They sent me a code to give to the driver to recieve the package. They told me not to give it over the phone/intercom, and to only give it in person. He tapped it into his phone before giving me the package. I suppose he needed to do so to mark the package as delivered. That seemed a reliable enough system.
mbreese
Seems like a good system, but it will only work if Amazon is the one doing the final delivery…
In cases like this where it is third party (in this case FedEx), there’s no way to manage that.
throwaway48476
How long are they required to wait? They're going to start marking it as undeliverable without knocking just to get done with the route faster.
Technical solutions always fail to solve social trust problems.
stevage
That definitely happens here in Aus, but I'd still prefer that over a brand new phone left on the verandah.
b0bb1z3r0
[dead]
cosmic_cheese
Similarly living in an apartment complex with a package locker doesn’t necessarily help. At both of the places I lived with one of those, deliveries were routinely dumped on the floor in front of the lockers, and so you’d have to watch delivery status like a hawk, hope you noticed that it was delivered quickly enough, and then awkwardly dig through a bunch of other peoples’ deliveries to retrieve yours. Had a couple of packages disappear that way.
hombre_fatal
Man, the worst is "overnight shipping" on Amazon. It's a huge nerf over normal shipping, but they push it like it's some sort of perk.
Unless you live in a detached home, "overnight shipping" just means someone's going to call you at 5:30am asking how to enter your apartment and then try again in two days when you don't pick up. One time I did this dance for a week because they kept coming at 4am, and I feel bad for them too, but c'mon "4am-8am" delivery, and they don't have Amazon Locker access?
I wish I could disable it permanently.
tchalla
In some countries, delivery items require a 2FA code. I still don’t think it solves the problem as delivery drivers are stressed and this would lead to dropping stuff at alternatives like a post office or something. There’s no full solution until delivery drivers are paid a fair minimum amount.
pimlottc
I had a brand new laptop disappear this way. The delivery log shows a failed delivery attempt, followed by a “signed delivery” in my name 5 minutes later. Meanwhile I wasn’t even in the same state.
Never did find out what happened to it, fortunately the seller was willing to send a replacement to make it right.
Seattle3503
I feel grateful I live in a large condo with concierge service that always receives my packages. I've never had a package stolen since moving in.
orthoxerox
> The delivery people just ignore it.
When the compensation for stolen items starts being taken out of their pay, they will stop ignoring it.
Nextgrid
Part of the reason they don't do that is because they're already paying the lowest the market will bear (and being able to steal items might very well be priced in by said market).
ronnier
> The group created software to scrape FedEx tracking numbers and bribed AT&T store employees to get order details and delivery addresses, according to a criminal complaint filed in New Jersey. The group then sent thieves to pick off the packages and bring them back to destinations like the Brooklyn shop
> employee also received bonuses of $2,000-2,500 for recruiting other AT&T employees into the scheme.
0cf8612b2e1e
It is a good scam, but you have to assume you have a limited window before getting caught. Too many accomplices - eventually someone will be caught and rat out the rest of the crew.
What other high value items are shipped regularly? I thought Costco started selling gold recently, which seems way more lucrative and harder to trace than phones.
death916
That's a good point. I think most people go into Costco to get the gold though. I'd need some good shipping insurance on a $3000+ purchase
sparrish
The gold costco sells is serialized. It is traceable and if you report it stolen, if it's found in a pawn shop or the pocket of a thief, you will get it back.
0cf8612b2e1e
Couldn’t you kiss it with a propane torch to melt away the identifiers? Shred it? Some mechanism of making it non traceable.
jjani
> Overall, it was a complex, multi-faceted crime ring.
Looks like a not-so complex, multi-faceted LLM was used to help write this article :)
red-iron-pine
this will soon be most news articles outside of a couple of places, like AP or Reuters
Snoozus
It would be trivial to keep track the IMEI of the phones and to render them worthless by blacklisting them on the mobile networks. Why is this not done?
Same applies to any stolen phones btw.
noja
It would be even more trivial for Apple to block the phones the same way they do when an Apple Store is broken into. You can’t use an iPhone without an activation via login.
chneu
Carriers have this ability. They'll do it under certain circumstances. This isn't really one of them.
It's extra work for the carrier and can result in innocent people being denied service so they lean towards not banning IMEIs.
Also it can be spoofed so it isn't a surefire way to ban these devices.
qingcharles
They used to get broken down for parts, as the screens etc were still worth hundreds on their own. But since the parts are now encoded, that can't be done as easily.
kioleanu
This is happening in Germany too, but in another form. The delivery is handed personally, you sign or confirm it. The package is sealed, but when you open it, there’s something else in there, usually of the same weight as to not trigger alarm bells along the way. The phone or tablet disappears along the way somehow.
Then you go into a kafkaesque process with Amazon, who say “sure buddy, we sent you something else”, and then you have to file a police report and probably have to claw the money back which leads to the forfeiture of your account.
A good solution I’ve seen from Otto, another big eshop here in Germany is that they seal the package with tape that can’t be removed without damaging either the tape or the box and you are instructed not to accept the package if it’s been tampered with.
throwaway48476
In Asia it's common to record yourself opening the package. Ultimately social trust can't be fixed with technology.
sintezcs
In my country delivery guys always phone you and knock on your door to give you your package. If you are not at home, they will get the package back and try to deliver it the next day. I’ve never heard of an option to ask them to just leave the package outside.
itpcc
Looks like tracking number scraping is so much of an issue now isn't it? (Although, in this case, this incident is also include bribing an employee too.) Quite the same story with the GPU delivery scam covered by LTT recently. [0]
In my country, at least, some provider is now requiring related party's phone number to be included in order to access the tracking data. [1]
SoftTalker
Are deliveries of new iPhones not insured? If they are, I'd think it's the insurance company's problem. I suppose they will claim they have a photo of the package on your doorstep but if a porch pirate gets to it first do they not cover that?
eru
Insurance companies don't really turn your problems into their problems.
It's easier to think of them turning _risks_ of occasional large losses into a steady constant flow of losses.
Whatever level of verification you pick, an insurance company can give you a quote. If you want to implement a very lax policy (without even a photo of the package on the doorstep), the insurance company will charge you an arm and a leg for coverage.
If you pick a more robust system, the insurance will become cheaper.
SoftTalker
OK, but if the delivery is covered, with a "photo on the doorstep" level of proof, and the recipient claims they did not receive it, do they (insurance) pay for the loss or is it going to be an argument?
eru
That depends on the policy. But you are right that my analysis only really applies for repeat players.
So if you have two insurance providers with the same written down policies, but one provider A usually pays out, and the other B fights it tooth and nail, then provider A has an easier time selling their services for a higher price. Reputation matters.
Thus in the end (assuming some competition) the actual policies as implemented matter more than what's written down.
stevage
Wait, is it really common to deliver high value packages to completely insecure locations like this in the US?
They never do that here in Australia. Either sign for it, or you get a card saying where you can go and pick it up, with ID.
leoedin
I bought a knife on Amazon. Every step of the process says “you must be over 18 and show ID to the delivery driver”. The ordering page, follow up email, tracking page, even the parcel had in huge letters “over 18 ID required”.
I found the parcel outside my front door like all the other parcels.
Ultimately if the drivers are strongly incentivised to be fast, and not strongly incentivised to follow process, they won’t follow process.
echoangle
Is that an Amazon thing? There’s no loges requirement to not sell knives to children, right?
> Require a signature for all of your valuable deliveries, including and especially iPhones.
I'm not sure if this is universal, or region-specific, but out of all the times that I've received something that's been signature-required, it's incredibly rare (single-digit percent) that the driver will actually get my signature. Usually when I see the "SIGNED BY XYZ" note on the delivery notification, it's some random name.
90+% of the time they don't even check my ID when it's a wine delivery, like they're supposed to.
Drivers are overworked and have too many deliveries on their plate. They're not going to bother to get signatures.