Show HN: Tangled – Git collaboration platform built on atproto
10 comments
·March 2, 2025evanjrowley
I'd like to make a feature request for Dark Mode
mdaniel
Populating https://tangled.sh/@tangled.sh/core/issues/new is more likely to get traction than a HN comment
0x4FFC8F
Great work guys! Haven't had a chance to look into atproto and bluesky, but now because of tangled I will.
imoverclocked
How does authorization work? Is everything pull-only or can you push to someone’s knot?
icy
Hey, you can indeed push to someone’s knot if they’ve invited you on it. The knot server will automatically populate your ssh pubkeys (if you’ve added them) allowing you to push. :)
linwangg
[dead]
xnxt
did you consider integrating atproto with Radicle? if no, why not?
nsteel
The second paragraph of their blog posts suggests Radicle doesn't support central identity. It's really hard to imagine one of the core concepts of Radicle bending (breaking) to allow that.
CGamesPlay
Building on this, I think Radicle would be described as "peer-to-peer", whereas something like Tangled is "federated". The article differentiates Tangled from other federated systems by saying that you can use a "centralized" ID using AT Protocol, but I don't know if the ID provider itself is centralized, centralized-but-self-hostable, or federated.
Thanks for this. Looks cool!
I see you mentioned Radicle. What are the major differences compared to Radicle? Having read just the blog post I would guess it's the source of the identity as a start, so you can use users' existing atproto did s whereas Radicle has to bootstrap a whole new identity web.