Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

Frank Gehry has died

Frank Gehry has died

34 comments

·December 5, 2025

Polizeiposaune

From 2002: "Frank Gehry No Longer Allowed To Make Sandwiches For Grandkids":

https://theonion.com/frank-gehry-no-longer-allowed-to-make-s...

(just a picture, no story).

npunt

I grew up a few blocks from his funky Santa Monica house [1], passed by it all the time. When you’re a kid you typically see wild new things like that as just normal because you have no context for how unusual they are. His house defied that perspective; even as a kid you understand that being wrapped in oddly angled chain link fences and corrugated metal is just... different. It's an unanswered question, a loose thread, a thing you can't unknow.

I don't particularly like the house - it's meant to be challenging not beautiful - but with perspective I see now there aren't many creations out there that achieve existence in eternal confusion like it does for me. I see his other works like Bilbao [2] and Disney Hall as refinements on the concept with the added dimension of beauty. They're not quite as memorable, but I think do a great job exploring the frontier of beauty and befuddlement.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gehry_Residence

[2] especially the aerial perspective https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guggenheim_Museum_Bilbao#/medi...

aio2

I don't have much to say about the focus of your comment, but I do want to talk about this:

"When you’re a kid you typically see wild new things like that as just normal because you have no context for how unusual they are."

NOT TRUE! I remember then (and even now) looking at unique things in awe and amazement, rather than something normal or ordinary.

Just what I think :)

detourdog

I saw him speak about that house and at that time he was having a really hard time living in the suburban mindset. He wanted to offend.

I’m jealous that you knew it so well and as just another house.

null

[deleted]

ssttoo

He also designed a Facebook’s office in Menlo Park. The roof was literally a park, seemingly blending with the bay and you could go for a nice nature stroll mid-day by just going up a flight of stairs. https://arquitecturaviva.com/works/facebook-campus-in-menlo-...

ipsum2

I worked in this building. It was terrible. Low light, completely open office, people walking around you all the time, extremely noisy, pretty ugly (the roof-top garden was the exception). My team expensed noise cancelling headphones because it was so loud.

MPK 22 was also designed by Gehry Partners, which was a massive improvement on the inside, but outside is still kinda terrible in my opinion: https://www.truebeck.com/project/facebook-mpk-22/

sippeangelo

Wow you weren't kidding. The insides of that looks like an absolute hellscape. Like a whole floor is missing and they just set up shop in a warehouse!

pavlov

I’ve spent some time there, and it did seem like a building that was primarily designed for satellite view — never mind what goes on inside.

null

[deleted]

null

[deleted]

null

[deleted]

SteveGerencser

I got to meet Frank in the mid 90s while studying architecture in New Mexico. He was incredibly generous with his time and ideas to us students that stayed extra late to catch him touring the studios with the dean around midnight. His midnight critique of my design that was due the next morning made me throw it out and start over to include some of his ideas.

losvedir

He designed the Stata center at MIT. I know it's had lots of problems (leaks and other issues) because of its wonky design. But I always liked walking by, and thought of it as a Dr Seuss building.

ternus

Anecdotally, the professors I talked to in the building hated it. Non-rectilinear walls and oddly-shaped offices made it difficult to put up bookcases and desks. The windows were all custom, meaning if one broke, it was difficult to replace. And, of course, the aforementioned leaks.

I was in the Radio Society and had access to the Green Building (50) roof. The Stata Center actually looks coherent from that angle, and you can tell that was the angle the designers and approvers had been seeing it from (in model form) the whole time.

neilv

I saw the (a?) architectural model for Stata before it was built. I was with an artist, and we just walked into somewhere it had been set up for an event. (Yay for MIT culture of letting students go most places on campus.) It looked pretty crazy at the time. IIRC, there was a clear sphere embedded in the top of one of the lower roofs. My joke was that the model looked like someone had taken a paperweight, and smashed up a previously ordinary-looking building. It was crazy when construction started, and you could start to see elements of the building emerge, like, they are actually building that. (Though they left out the paperweight sphere.)

Before it was built, a designer friend, who'd worked worked in a Stata building before, mentioned the frequent complaints of Gehry buildings, such as people in triangular offices, or with slanting walls, that couldn't fit a desk.

Years later, I was surprised and deligted to end up working in Stata. My office was pretty generic rectangular and functional, with big windows that opened. No complaints about the office, except the HVAC couldn't win against the early GPU compute my officemate was doing. Space in the building was in demand by everyone, yet there were large areas of dead space. I wondered whether some of the conspicuously unused space was because they couldn't figure out how to adapt it, but was being consciously banked, so that space could be made for PIs who arrived later.

Stewart Brand criticized IM Pei's building for the original Media Lab (E15), as not being malleable like the "temporary" Building 20, and maybe some of the same criticism applied. Though Stata, coincidentally built partly on the site of Building 20 that was razed for it, did incorporate plywood elements in the interior, I think as a nod to Building 20. This included large plywood tables that were moved around as needed for different purposes in the open ares outside the elevator on my floor (G10?), multiple times a day.

The strange bathroom placement, and the ones that used visibly dirty ("green") water to flush, weren't a practical problem, but multiple times were awkward to explain to visitors. I liked the big single-person bathrooms on the office floors, and they were luxurious for students and professors doing all-nighters to get in a discreet paper towel bath, compared to the indignity of trying to do it in a toilet stall.

One thing I liked about the larger building design was the main street ground floor, adding cafe and various random seating, which was a big improvement over the Infinite Corridor.

Analemma_

I toured at MIT when I was applying to colleges, and the student narrating the walking tour trash-talked the Stata Center pretty brutally as we went by it, mentioning the leaks, the lawsuit, how nobody liked it, etc.

I never knew if those were her actual feelings or if this was part of a script approved by the admissions office, or even which of those possibilities would be crazier.

BeetleB

bombcar

“ neglige0nce”

Weird article. Maybe OCR?

ghaff

The exterior design grew on me, for all the issues it had, over time. The few times I was in there I liked the ground design well enough as a space. But I'm not sure I've ever heard anyone rave about the interior layout as a working space in general.

I know someone who worked for an HVAC sub for the building and they said it was really hard because there weren't plans as they were used to working on at the time.

onionisafruit

I first heard of him through The Simpsons and will forever think of "Hey Frank Gehry! like curvilinear forms, much?" when I hear his name.

forks

RIP. 8 Spruce is a personal favorite.

eclipticplane

Agreed, such a great structure in NYC's skyline. Lived on 73 for a few years. The contoured windows and benches inside were just as fun as the exterior.

Still don't understand why they stuck a red brick school in the middle and didn't contour it with the stainless steel panels like the rest of the building.

BobAliceInATree

I toured that building when I was looking for a place, and just so happened to be there when there was recess or something. The loud noise of kids was definitely a significant factor in me not signing a lease.

null

[deleted]

wahnfrieden

My sis has some of his wood chairs. Very nice work.

brcmthrowaway

Who else gets confused between Frank Gehry and Frank Lloyd Wright?

dreamcompiler

The only thing they have in common is that if you look at one of their buildings you instantly know who designed it. But nobody ever confuses an FLW building with an FG building.

cowsandmilk

Beyond sharing a first name, they don’t share much in common. And Frank Lloyd Wright died about the time Frank Gehry started.

themafia

As an artist I appreciate Frank Gehry.

As an engineer I detest Frank Gehry.

christkv

I think the only one I consider worse is Calatrava from an engineering perspective

null

[deleted]