Agentic Development Environment by JetBrains
15 comments
·December 3, 2025BrandonSmith
Seems this is the product JetBrains mentioned in their sun-setting announcement of the short-lived CodeCanvas product.
https://blog.jetbrains.com/codecanvas/2025/10/jetbrains-is-s...
piker
The litmus test for the utility of this kind of thing is does JetBrains prefer to use Air to develop Air--i.e., is it self-hosting?
cheptsov
Finally a step in the right direction. This brings the best of two worlds: the lightweightness of Fleet and agents battle-tested with Junie/IntelliJ.
Congrats to the team. Can’t wait to try it.
matt3210
Ooof I forgot to cancel my jetbrains all products license when I switched to vs code. I better go do that now before it renews. Not because of AI but it also doesn’t help
faizshah
Not to be overly negative but I’m kinda disappointed with this and I have been a JetBrains shill for many years.
I already use this workflow myself, just multiple terminals with Claude on different directories. There’s like 100 of these “Claude with worktrees in parallel” UIs now, would have expected some of the common jetbrains value adds like some deep debugger integration or some fancy test runner view etc. The only one I see called out is Local History and I don’t see any fancy diff or find in files deep integration to diff or search between the agent work trees and I don’t see the jetbrains commit, shelf, etc. git integration that we like.
I do like the cursor-like highlight and add to context thing and the kanban board sort of view of the agent statuses, but this is nothing new.
In summary it looks like just another parallel Claude UI rather than a Jetbrains take on it. It also seems like it’s a separate IDE rather than built on the IntelliJ platform so they probably won’t turn it into a plugin in the future either.
gavinray
Not to rain on their parade, but I do find it at least a little bit funny that Kotlin Multiplatform is JetBrains's prerogative and the app is Mac only, lol...
buster
It's a preview, isn't it? The pages says win, mac, Linux.
davey48016
Yeah. Windows, Linux, and Web are listed under "What's Coming"
gfody
market research shows that 100% of the people interested in this style of development are mac users
GiorgioG
Can't wait for this AI shit to be over so they can get back to their bread & butter...great dev tools.
NitpickLawyer
> their bread & butter...great dev tools.
A cursor style "tab" model, but trained on jetbrains IDEs with full access to their internals, refactoring tools and so on would be interesting to see.
ElijahLynn
Umm, it ain't ever gonna be over, it is a new era.
We need to adapt to new ways of thinking and ways of working with new tooling. It is a learning curve of sorts. What we want is to solve problems, the new tooling enables us to solve problems better by letting us free up our thinking by reducing blockers and toil tasks, giving us more time to think about higher level problems.
I remember this same sentiment towards AI when I was growing up, but towards cell phones...
rileymichael
> What we want is to solve problems
speak for yourself, i want to understand everything and be elbow deep in the code
ElijahLynn
Umm, it ain't ever gonna be over, it is a new era.
We need to adapt to new ways of thinking and ways of working with new tooling. It is a learning curve of sorts. What we want is to solve problems, the new tooling enables us to solve problems better by letting us free up our thinking by reducing blockers and toil tasks, giving us more time to think about higher level problems.
I'd like others' input on this: increasingly, I see Cursor, Jetbrains, etc. moving towards a model of having you manage many agents working on different tasks simultaneously. But in real, production codebases, I've found that even a single agent is faster at generating code than I am at evaluating its fitness and providing design guidance. Adding more agents working on different things would not speed anything up. But perhaps I am just much slower or a poorer multi-tasker than most. Do others find these features more useful?