Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

Please stop asking me to provide feedback #8036

gwbas1c

I've definitely responded with prompts for feedback with "Stop nagging me for feedback all the time. I just want to (do what the app is for) without interruption."

It's kind of shocking how some people just don't get how insanely insulting it is for an application to constantly ask for feedback.

SoftTalker

Also, and to generalize:

Stop asking me about accepting cookies.

Stop asking me to subscribe to your email list

Stop asking me to review my last purchase.

Stop telling me I need to subscribe to view this content.

Stop asking for my phone number

Stop asking for my income

If I want to do or tell you any of these things I will initiate that myself.

fallinghawks

My garbage disposal service sends me a survey once or twice a year asking if I would recommend them to my friends.

Where I live, garbage disposal is a county contract. You get get whatever company your county has engaged. Do they think people would to move to another county for better garbage disposal?

rkomorn

You forgot about websites wanting you to enable desktop notifications. That's always a nice one.

czhu12

I believe the first one at least is mandated by law.

zzo38computer

Only if you use cookies; I think not everyone will need to use cookies. I think if you use cookies to login, then only the login form should hopefully need to mention the cookies. (However, there are better ways to do user authentication, such as basic HTTP auth or X.509 auth; neither of which requires cookies.)

Bjartr

No. What's mandated by law is to not track users for reasons not core to delivering your service OR disclose that you are doing so.

redwall_hp

The opposite: it's mandated that you not do data collection and tracking for reasons except those essential for the company to provide the product or service, absent informed consent. (And this is purely for tracking: cookies used for maintaining preferences or other state are fine.)

The banners are a fig leaf for behavior that violates the spirit of the GDPR, creating an aggravation where the simplest way to dismiss them is by agreeing.

Any site that doesn't offer a button to reject the tracking (with no more stops than angreeing) and still function as expected without the tracking, is in violation of the law.

chaps

I read their comments as knowing that.

Imagine a world where you don't need to click on anything because cookies are no longer being used for large scale tracking.

h1fra

you don't have to ask for cookies if you don't use them

iso1631

I find it interesting how even if I accept cookies many sites still continue to ask

mrguyorama

The other day, NewRelic insisted on full screen pop up dialogs prompting me for some form of feedback for I'm not even sure what.

Multiple times within a few minutes

During a damn incident I was trying to deal with

I left critical feedback. I wish someone would see it and feel ashamed, but it is rather clear that there haven't been decision makers in our industry capable of shame in many years.

kgwxd

Ok... How was your call quality? -Teams

throwaway2027

You're the human feedback in the RLHF part of Reinforcement learning human feedback. You're also their paypig for their $200 Max plan which you also get limited on. You're also their free advertisement, keep at it. I can't wait for the open-source alternatives to catch up if ever.

mystraline

I already got that up and running.

Vscodium, and Claude replacement. And its abliterated to boot, so no censorship and garbage.

antipaul

"To permanently turn off the feedback survey for yourself, set `CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_FEEDBACK_SURVEY=1`"

Per recent comment from Anthropic at https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/8036#issuec...

nszceta

There is already ~/.claude/settings.json

What is going on over there at Anthropic?

nojs

This nag often comes up at the very beginning of a session, before you could realistically evaluate whatever A/B test they’re running with any accuracy. I hope they’re not taking the data too seriously.

timenotwasted

Despite what they say in that GH comment that it was reduced by 10x my anecdata is that it has been hyper-aggressive in the last few days. I had it popup twice during a single context window session. It makes me feel like they are really concerned about model regressions and in turn their lack of confidence makes me really not confident about what's going on behind the scenes.

lokar

No current employee of a corporation can promise that data collected today will not in the future be used for any particular purpose. It's simply not up to them, and companies change massively over time.

Get it in an air-tight legal agreement with some kind of audit provision, actual enforcement and penalties, or don't give out data you care about.

astrange

> No current employee of a corporation can promise that data collected today will not in the future be used for any particular purpose.

Yes they can, because data privacy laws forbid collecting data for one purpose and then using it for new ones without notice or consent.

jzb

This means that, possibly, I can sue if my data is misused: it does not prevent its misuse. It doesn’t offer any protection if the law changes, or any real protection against constant TOS changes, etc.

o11c

That would be meaningful if there were ever any enforcement.

null

[deleted]

redwood

Funny.. you're giving some feedback right there

mreome

There's a fundamental difference between just providing/using a mechanism for user feedback, and interrupting someone's workflow with frequent unsolicited nagging requests for feedback.