Everything from 1991 Radio Shack ad I now do with my phone (2014)
151 comments
·September 7, 2025mastazi
gbraad
For those that are unfamiliar. In short it is a push-to-talk broadcast, public channel, communication. CB stands for Citizen Band.
In Europe, I remember the same frequency, 27 MHz being used for early RC cars. Not sure if EU truck drivers used this too, but it is available and caused runaway RC cars as it was unreliable to use that band. 40Mhz didn't have that issue, but perhaps it was not allowed for regular/unlicensed use...
throw-qqqqq
> In Europe, I remember the same frequency, 27 MHz being used for early RC cars. Not sure if EU truck drivers used this too
I know they used to at least. 20 years ago I worked vacations as a courier. My boss installed a 27MHz radio in my truck, because the local truckers would warn about police raids etc. on it.
epolanski
> there were many attempts to make smartphone apps where you can communicate with people that are physically around you
As someone who has worked in the area: safety was a nightmare, in the sense of "be a woman visible on a distance-based chat".
masternight
I'm in the same country. Another big reason to use a CB over a phone is that it's illegal to touch a phone while driving. No such restriction applies to CB radios.
The tech is very much alive and well.
firesteelrain
CB radio being closely related to ham radio arguably could be replaced with the Echolink app on your iPhone. Or one of the SDRs like WebSDR or KiwiSDR (listening only)
smackeyacky
In theory you could make a Bluetooth 5 app that works like those Cardo motorcycle intercoms (2 to 20 riders on the same conversation over BLE I think). I should look into it.
Hobadee
Not quite CB but similar; as a Ham radio operator, I can do Ham radio on my phone. (EchoLink)
dogman1050
I still have a pair of those Mach Two speakers in use in my garage. Can confirm that a cell phone can't sound like that and that driving them with a Phase Linear 400 playing Led Zeppelin II can really rock the block until an amp output shorts and blows out the woofer with frying egg sounds. That amp is also known as a "Flame Linear."
Jolter
Author seems to have misread what the ”10-channel desktop scanner” is about. He seems to think it’s referring to an image scanner? I think it’s a device that monitors AM or FM radio for you.
I’m sure it’s been made obsolete, but I’m not sure it was by the iPhone.
jacquesm
It monitored various emergency and other radio channels used by police, fire department, ambulance service, taxis and so on. The '10 channels' is in reference to how many tuned channels the thing can scan.
Here is some more detail for that particular scanner:
pfexec
Waiting for someone to explain that iPhone has replaced this too (via streaming), completely unaware that the origin of the stream is likely a 3.5mm jack on... an actual scanner.
brewdad
While very true, so long as someone keeps that scanner online and the source remains unencrypted, only one person needs to own a scanner rather than hundreds.
Sadly, my city now encrypts all police channels. Fire and EMS can still be streamed though.
bluGill
Likely replaced by group text for most. my grandpa drove snowplow for the state and often had the scanner listening for when he might be called in. he couldn't respond directly but he did call dispatch to give his ability to come in. Pagers probably replaced that for many.
ianburrell
It might be possible to use iPhone as scanner with RTL-SDR dongle. I don't know if there is any scanner software for the iPhone, most of it is PC software.
djmips
Anything is possible with accesories but that breaks the thesis.
null
Bender
Radio frequency scanners are far from obsolete overall but they typically have a lot more channels and scan much faster now. They have continued to evolve or devolve for those that like simplicity. Plenty of people, myself included still have scanners in their home and vehicle. I just had mine on to find out why a parade of ambulance, fire and troopers were going down the highway.
Semi-related because Radio Shack, a store manager taught me how to leverage my "Tandy Service Plan" to get free upgrades on my scanner for life. I was not ready for him to do this. He grabbed my handheld 20 channel scanner by the antenna and smashed it on the desk. Then he handed me a 200 channel scanner because Radio Shack no longer had an equivalent model. Once the 200 channel scanner was obsolete I got a free 1000 channel scanner. Each iteration scanned both channels and stepped frequencies faster. Most scanners lock out particular frequency ranges but this can be bypassed usually by cutting one diode or moving a jumper. Radio Shack preferred the diode method. Nowadays people call this "frequency expansion" or expanded on scanners, ham radio, etc... Some HAM radios can be used as scanners once frequency expanded.
Some now prefer software defined radios to double as scanners. I like both. SDR's are great at home but too much clutter for in the vehicle for me. SDR's combined with leaked keys can monitor P25 encrypted law enforcement tactical channels.
womod
Right, but more specifically they are most often used for scanning stuff like air-band and VHF/UHF two-way radio traffic. Nowadays with a lot of public safety being digital P25 (requiring more expensive scanners) and online streams being so easily available, there's not a lot of reasons to buy a scanner unless you're really passionate about it.
teeray
I used a scanner this weekend to listen to the Blue Angels perform. It was also helpful to have their ground crew frequencies in their so we knew that they were a few minutes out from taking off (we watched from a few miles away at a friend’s house with a good view). Scanners are far from obsolete!
citizenpaul
While its rather cool that its available to everyone. Phones kinda killed the cool gadget market. Since your phone does everything, anything new or interesting is now some $5k+ minimum purchase.
I wonder if inflation adjusted gadgets are similar priced.
smelendez
Phones especially killed the giftable gadget market.
Department stores and Radio Shacks used to be full of little golf computers and VHS rewinders and electronic Scrabble dictionaries and sports trivia games around Father’s Day and Christmas. It would be unusual in most families, I think, to give someone an app for Christmas.
They’ve also changed our relationship with industrial design. There are probably fewer people designing gadgets, and consumers are less used to acquiring a new device and learning how to use it. I didn’t grow up in a particularly gadgety household, but by the time I was 12 I had learned to work a pretty wide variety of electronics with different interfaces and physical media. Nowadays even your TV is basically a smartphone with a remote.
majormajor
Some niche gadget-y things that are alive and well in the "a few hundred bucks or less" range:
* hardware tools / multi-tools
* bluetooth speakers
* portable projectors - outdoor big-screen movie night on the cheap
* the "sports/action" camera market - waterproof, magnetic/mountable, go-pro/insta360 etc
* pro/am mirrorless cameras are mostly too expensive to qualify but there's some really cool accesories now (handheld stabilizing gimbals, say)
* everything in the thread/zigbee/etc home automation space (sensors and buttons and automations...)
* car gadgets for enthusiast cars (things that plug into obd ports for diagnostics or real-time display of measurements), or "add android auto to your old car's built-in screen" multi-media retrofits (though in gaining things like this we've lost the ease of just things being single- or double-DIN in the first place), or dashcams
* vr headsets (feels very much like the sort of thing Radioshack of old would've been all over like the tiny handheld TVs)
* fitbits and such wearables
* portable monitors
* mechanical keyboards (as well as macro pads and such)
a lot of them qualify as "phone accesories" but I'm not sure that takes away from them
epicureanideal
Or have gadgets become incredibly cheap? 99 cent iPhone apps etc?
ars
There's an aspect of fun and tinkering that is gone. You can't usually change those apps or use them in ways not intended by the maker.
JKCalhoun
I'm still falling in love with dedicated devices.
My Sony digital camera is still a lot of fun (so are my medium- format film cameras for that matter). Of course the phone is the camera I always have on me.
I have plenty of other dedicated devices but I'm kind of lazy to think about them, list them. (A digital 12-channel recorder/mixer just jumped to my mind though.)
alexchantavy
In music, phones also killed metronomes and tuners which I'm thrilled about because by themselves those are $30+ instead of $1 (or free with ads) for an app
myself248
I feel the same about the 1993 issue of Mondo 2000's "R U A Cyberpunk?"
https://aphelis.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Mondo_2000_ma...
Except the stun gun, volt meter, and the cash. Even back then, they call out the value of non-digital paper money. A phone absolutely can't replace that.
behringer
Crypto coin is the next best thing to cash, I would say that it's in the bag if you use a wallet on your phone, although it could be argued.
TJSomething
Practically speaking, you can also replace a radar detector with the Waze app.
macNchz
Waze works great once there's a critical mass of other drivers—busy roads in populated areas. My radar detector fills in the gaps on back roads and small towns very well.
wooooooshter
Why not just obey the speed limits and stop putting innocent people at risk so that you can edge lord your way through late adolescence?
mcny
Speed limits are not the solution. Proper road design is the real solution. We shouldn't have straight four lane stroads that look like a racing strip going straight as an arrow for five miles if the intent is to limit speed to twenty five miles per hour. Slow the road down with curves and bends, not with a signage and paint.
andrehacker
I thought the same but then I realized the post is from 2014, so maybe not at the time
kikokikokiko
For fixed radars, at least down here in Brazil, RadarBot is a lot better than Waze. For cops on the side of the road, maybe Waze can be better. RadarBot updates it's list of fixed spees cameras really fast.
Sharlin
Additional 1991 gadgets you now have in your phone:
- Color TV (screen's a bit tight though)
- VCR
- Pager
- GPS (very recent and expensive in 1991)
- In-car navigation (just barely available in 1991)
- Portable cassette player
- Portable video game console (GameBoy launched in 1989)
- Modem and sound card for the Tandy
- SGI workstation for rendering 3D graphics
glandium
Phones in Japan used to receive actual TV. Well, slightly different, but still directly from the waves rather than the internet. Phones used to receive AM and FM, too.
promiseofbeans
Some still can! Usually more low-mid teir devices.
Some of the higher end ones (such as my phone, which is how I know this) have the AM/FM signal processor built into their SoC, but the pins aren't wired to an antena.
bri3d
In the US we also briefly got this really cursed thing: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaFLO
OJFord
Not forgetting the humble home phone, and car phone.
accrual
In some ways one could also include a Game Boy in that list!
Sharlin
I did :) I think you caught me between edits.
yepitwas
More than just some: an iPhone is my preferred device for playing games for Nintento portables. Literally gameboy games.
bilsbie
Let’s have some fun with this:
Newspaper
Classifieds
Phone book
Rolodex
Photo album
ATM?
Health tracker?
Translator
Dictionary
Thesaurus
Notebook
Scanner
Compass
Flashlight
Sears catalog?
JdeBP
You're racing ahead. I'm still trying to find the slot where we are supposed to be putting those cassettes in to play them. (-:
Sharlin
Stills camera! Somehow that wasn't yet mentioned.
Calendar
Egg timer
Stopwatch
Wrist watch
Calendar
Encyclopedia
Star map and ephemeris
TV/stereo etc remote control
Heating/AC etc remote control
Credit+debit card
Language learning cassettes
Books
Paper maps (in general, not just for car navi)
Keys and key cards
Bird, plant, insect, mushroom etc guide
Level and tape measure (kind of)
dude250711
Meh, I'd rather had been born to same parents but as a USA boomer baby.
giveita
CB? Maybe you can get a walkie talkie app but there is nothing like CB on phone. (If there was it would be banned!)
CamperBob2
How/why would it be banned, if all it did was provide emulated 'channels' for shared voice comms among users in a local geographic area?
guerrilla
Came here to say this. There's nothing like a CB radio or the mentioned scanner on a phone. (Scanner apps are streaming from actual scanners in the real world somewhere).
zkmon
So all of those different technologies got swirled into the magic lamp (smart phone). And then what happened in the next 10 years until now? The phenomenon stagnated. The lamp got bigger and bigger screens, more hardware, but the core abilities didn't change as much they did back in those years.
jml7c5
We're on the verge of another consolidation, where laptops and tablets become dumb shells for phones. (Exceptions: "hardcore" gaming, software development, content creation.) But yes, there's less to capture.
tho23i4324234
That's hardly surprising no ? These 'revolutions' only happen once every few decades, and looking back everything looks insignificant (because their significance shrinks to nothing when you're at the wake of the exponential function).
If you look back there's basically "nothing" that happened till the 90s; and if widen the horizon a bit and look back 'nothing' appears to have happened till the 20th century and so on.
We grow in ability, not wisdom (which is why 'forgetting' is so much more catastrophic).
fmbb
I think the only explanation is that Steve Jobs was some kind of god, or extraterrestrial visitor.
You write 10 but isn’t it a lot closer to 20 years by now?
waltwalther
The author lists everything his phone has replaced, and the two items his phone cannot replace yet. One of those is a radar detector. To that I offer the Waze app. While it is not exactly a radar detector, it still serves the same purpose.
Funny story. I first heard of the Waze app while reading a Car & Driver magazine in my doctor's office nearly 15 years ago (possibly before 2010). There was an article on illegal cross-country car racing. One of the drivers said something like, "I use a combination of radar detector and Waze to avoid the police."
I had no idea what Waze was, and researched it as soon as I got home. It has always been crowd-sourced, and there were not many users back in those days (at least in my area), but I used it and spread the word anyway,
_heimdall
Those are two different use cases for me. A radar detector is much more specific. Waze replaces the usefulness of other drivers flashing their lights at me.
Anecdotally, people rarely seem to do that today for whatever reason. I expect at this point people think I'm either trying to cuss them out or complain about how bright their headlights are today, but if you see me flashing my lights there is a cop ahead looking for tickets.
modeless
> Mobile CB
It's actually ridiculous that our phones support dozens of sophisticated radio protocols but can't act as two way radios without a cell tower from the right company nearby. A $10 walkie talkie can communicate over miles but your phone is a brick without service. This capability would save more lives than Apple's satellite SOS IMO.
JCM9
They don’t really have the right frequencies available. In the GHz range they operate point to point comms at ground level with low powered radios wouldn’t be a great experience except for if you were so close to someone you could practically shout at them.
Amateur Radio and GMRS though are still very much things that will give good performance for those use cases. GMRS requires a “license” but no skill is required, just payment to the FCC.
Ham radio or GMRS are still great options for remote areas or at crowded venues where nobody can get cell service because everything is overloaded.
modeless
The frequencies that walkie-talkies use are available for walkie-talkie use. Sure, it might need another antenna, but so do features like mmWave, UWB, and Satellite SOS, and I guarantee a genuine walkie-talkie feature would see more usage than those. iPhones already contain antennas for dozens of bands including 600 MHz. I don't see it being infeasible to add ~465 MHz band support.
vel0city
Unihertz even makes an Android phone with a DMR UHF transceiver, the Atom XL.
ChuckMcM
Ignoring the frequencies for a moment, because physics, the phone does 'wi-fi' calling just fine, a 40 'channel' (or 'room') push to talk (or VOX) voice app is pretty trivial. You get close just running the discord client on your phone. That _does_ require WiFi, but _doesn't_ require a cell tower. So modally, totally doable from a WiFi network, if your making your own WiFi network then yeah, you need a cell tower.
Lerc
There are a lot of things our phones are capable of that we are not able to get them to do.
Even before the iPhone I had a phone with front and rear cameras and Bluetooth, it has long since been replaced and is probably sitting at the back of a drawer somewhere. If I had the ability to make it work as a Bluetooth webcam it might have had a productive second life. It was physically capable of doing this, just not software capable
com2kid
The latency and bandwidth on BT does not suffice for today's expected webcam level quality.
FWIW you can use an Android phone as a web cam. Not sure what the latency is though...
Lerc
Yes but this was pre iPhone days. It was not going to be doing today's expected webcam level quality no matter which way you sliced it.
ianburrell
Walkie talkies require a lot more power than smartphones have. FRS is 2W, ham radio handhelds are usually 5W, smartphone Wifi is 30mW. They also require a long antenna sticking out the top. Smartphones have UHF range antennas so possible to fit them but won't be as good.
What is disappointing is that LTE Direct and 5G Peer to Peer didn't go anywhere. They do LTE or 5G directly without towers. The range is 1km, not walkie talkie distance, but enough for a lot of things. There are some first responders phones with but it doesn't seem to be available for public.
ChuckMcM
> Walkie talkies require a lot more power than smartphones have.
Yes and no. "Real" handhelds could broadcast at 5W but the Walkie Talkies that Radio Shack sold[1] were in the unlicensed band and limited to 10000 uV/m which is well within capabilities of a current cell phone power wise, as you note this would not be efficient with their antenna arrangement :-)
That said, it would be fairly trivial to use websockets to create a "PTT Walkie Talkie app" (think 2 person zoom meeting with no video)
[1] Exemplar Realistic TC-500 page 56 of this 1991 catalog: https://www.radioshackcatalogs.com/flipbook/1991_radioshack_...
bilsbie
Bitchat might interest you. It just uses Bluetooth for a local mesh.
paulkrush
From 2012. 13 years ago. It's interesting to note if we are talking just the desktop almost nothing has changed from 2012.
MBCook
Which means it’s time to update the current value!
In 2025 it would be $7,245.62.
MBCook
I’ve kept thinking about this, so I decided to run it in reverse. An iPhone 16 would be would be about $340 in 1991 money. That’s only 70% more than the cell phone in the catalog, or only _42%_ of the camcorder! The camcorder alone would be almost $1900 today. You could get a folding phone for that. Or three iPhones 16Es.
As anyone who's used it knows, CB radio is very much unlike anything you can do with a smartphone[1][2], so I argue it should go in the second list at the end of the article, where the author talks about things that can't be replaced by a smartphone.
[1] notice how CB radios can still be bought at major retailers such as this one, one of the largest in my country https://www.supercheapauto.com.au/4wd-recovery/uhf-cb-vhf-ra...
(the same can't be said of cassette recorders or answering machines or VHS camcorders)
[2] there were many attempts to make smartphone apps where you can communicate with people that are physically around you. These never picked up steam and the two examples I remember are now defunct (I can't remember the names, I will update this post if I find them)
EDIT: the apps in question were called Highlight app and Glancee app.
Highlight:
https://parislemon.com/post/18994363772/meeting-people-is-ea...
https://techcrunch.com/2012/03/08/highlight2x/
Glancee still has a website, but it no longer exists as a standalone app as they were acquired by Facebook many years ago:
https://glancee.com/