Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

Open Source Maintenance Fee

Open Source Maintenance Fee

7 comments

·August 21, 2025
Visit

password4321

As discussed last month: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44669858 (2025-07-24, 252 comments)

nilsbunger

Interestingly, they've made only the source code open-source. They require a license agreement to download releases. See for example: https://github.com/wixtoolset/wix/releases/tag/v6.0.1

chii

so in theory, someone could download the source, rebuild, and redistribute a release which would then bypass the Open Source Maintenance Fee, wont it?

jraph

Absolutely.

But it can still work. in a company, as an employee, you can say a tool needs to be paid and get your company to pay even if there are binaries available elsewhere.

I work for a company that sells open source extensions. It would be pretty trivial and legal to remove the license checks, but companies just pay.

andreasmetsala

Engineering time is money and going through internally the process of building, testing and distributing binaries for every release is a lot of engineering time. Paying a sum of money to make the problem go away is a reasonable solution.

hahn-kev

Right but in supply chain terms I'm way less likely to trust the build from some random person. So if your company cares about it's supply chain it's easy to justify the expense.