Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

HN

Why LLMs Can't Write Q/Kdb+: Writing Code Right-to-Left

Ruby 3.4 frozen string literals: What Rails developers need to know

prateekcodes.dev

Serving a half billion requests per day with Rust and CGI

Is the doc bot docs, or not?

Helm local code execution via a malicious chart

Most RESTful APIs aren't really RESTful

florian-kraemer.net

security-explorations.com

Bootstrapping a side project into a profitable seven-figure business

projectionlab.com

Using MPC for Anonymous and Private DNA Analysis

US Court nullifies FTC requirement for click-to-cancel

arstechnica.com

7-Zip for Windows can now use more than 64 CPU threads for compression

RapidRAW: A non-destructive and GPU-accelerated RAW image editor

Phrase origin: Why do we "call" functions?

quuxplusone.github.io

IKEA ditches Zigbee for Thread going all in on Matter smart homes

Astro is a return to the fundamentals of the web

websmith.studio

Breaking Git with a carriage return and cloning RCE

I'm Building LLM for Satellite Data EarthGPT.app

I Ported SAP to a 1976 CPU. It Wasn't That Slow

Where can I see Hokusai's Great Wave today?

greatwavetoday.com

Frame of preference A history of Mac settings, 1984–2004

Supabase MCP can leak your entire SQL database

generalanalysis.com

Smollm3: Smol, multilingual, long-context reasoner LLM

Libpostal: C library for parsing/normalizing street addresses around the world

OLMo 2 - a family of fully-open language models

OLMo 2 - a family of fully-open language models

4 comments

·July 9, 2025

adt

This model is from Nov/2024.

https://lifearchitect.ai/models-table/

tripplyons

Nice to see how open it is! However, if you are just looking for the best model, Mistral Small 3.2 appears to be a stronger model with fewer parameters compared to OLMo 2 32B. It would be interesting to see how far these "fully open" models can get to their "open weight" counterparts.

real0mar

The inconvenient truth might be that the other models score higher than OLMO because they aren't restricted to purely "open and accessible" training data. Who knows what private or ethically dubious data went into training Mistral or llama, for example.

erlend_sh

Exactly. If we really wanted to benchmark the various models on the merits of their individual implementations, we should be comparing them all on the same open dataset.