QEMU: Define policy forbidding use of AI code generators
github.com
A new pyramid-like shape always lands the same side up
quantamagazine.org
What Problems to Solve (1966)
genius.cat-v.org
OpenAI charges by the minute, so speed up your audio
george.mand.is
Build and Host AI-Powered Apps with Claude – No Deployment Needed
anthropic.com
Better Auth, by a self-taught Ethiopian dev, raises $5M from Peak XV, YC
techcrunch.com
Getting ready to issue IP address certificates
community.letsencrypt.org
Writing a basic Linux device driver when you know nothing about Linux drivers
crescentro.se
Libxml2's "no security embargoes" policy
lwn.net
LM Studio is now an MCP Host
lmstudio.ai
Earths largest camera:3B pixel images
nytimes.com
Iroh: A library to establish direct connection between peers
github.com
America’s incarceration rate is in decline
theatlantic.com
IBM's Dmitry Krotov wants to crack the 'physics' of memory
research.ibm.com
Web Embeddable Common Lisp
turtleware.eu
CUDA Ray Tracing 2x Faster Than RTX: My CUDA Ray Tracing Journey
karimsayedre.github.io
FurtherAI (YC W24) Is Hiring for Software and AI Roles
ycombinator.com
Building a Monostable Tetrahedron
arxiv.org
I’m the person behind CollapseRAM. This isn’t a quantum computer it’s a symbolic memory system that simulates some informational behaviors of quantum systems, like collapse-on-read, entanglement, and no-cloning, using deterministic classical logic and RAM.
I’m not trying to replace physics or claim quantum advantage. I just wanted to see if we could model quantum-like constraints for key exchange and secure memory using symbolic logic alone and to my surprise, it actually works.
I’m not here to argue, just hoping the core idea gets a fair look. Thanks to everyone who gave it a moment.