Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

Joining Apple Computer (2018)

Joining Apple Computer (2018)

48 comments

·June 7, 2025

duxup

What a wonderful read.

I find myself pining for a lot of the "old days" when anything seemed possible and it was open and exciting. You could DO surprisingly, not a lot, but everything still felt possible.

Now everything seems trapped in advertising dominated closed box. Login and live in this limited little space...

The internet is still there, I can still put up a site that isn't covered with ads. I wish I could surf just that internet and so on.

9d

> I wish I could surf just that internet and so on.

You just solved it for me.

I've been wanting to recapture that same feeling for a while. I think a lot of us have.

That feeling of everything being new and wonderful and magical and full of potential.

Like printing colored text for the first time, or getting your player to jump and fall.

I haven't fully solved that part, but the feeling was what inspired the name 90s.dev

I've moved the root domain's content to a subdomain, because 90s.dev is for all of us.

I don't know what to put there yet. But something. Something for the community of us.

dedicate

I'm always blown away by the vision behind stuff like HyperCard. It was all about giving non-techies the keys to the kingdom.

But looking at today's tech landscape, with its walled gardens and app stores, I can't help but feel we've gone backwards.

JKCalhoun

Yeah, Hypercard or MacPaint (really a demo for Quickdraw). Had he done only one of those two he would still rank as a genius.

ronbenton

Apparently we need to be doing more LSD

kibwen

What's worse, in context here, is Apple's distinguished primary role in bringing this about.

gyomu

It's really hard to extract computing from the capitalistic, consumerist cradle within which it was born.

Every other human creative practice and media (poetry, theater, writing, music, painting, etc) have existed in a wide variety of cultures, societies, and economic contexts.

But computing has never existed outside of the immensely expensive and complex factories & supply chains required to produce computing components; and corporations producing software and selling it to other corporations, or to the large consumer class with disposable income that industrialization created.

In that sense the momentum of computing has always been in favor of the corporations manufacturing the computers dictating what can be done with them. We've been lucky to have had a few blips like the free software movement here and there (and the outsized effect they've had on the industry speaks to how much value there is to be found there), but the hard reality that's hard to fight is that if you control the chip factories, you control what can be done with the chips - Apple being the strongest example of this.

We're in dire need of movements pushing back against that. To name one, I'm a big fan of the uxn approach, which is to write software for a lightweight virtual machine that can run on the cheap, abundant, less/non locked down chips of yesteryear that will probably still be available and understandable a century from now.

swyx

you can only blame capitalism so much for the unpopularity of hypercardlike things vs instagram/facebook/twitter etc

on some level it is just human nature to want to consume than create. just is. its not great but lets not act like people havent tried to make creative new platforms for self expression and software creation and they all kinda failed

bigyabai

Part of the problem trying to isolate computing is that it's fundamentally material. Even cloud resources are a flimsy abstraction over a more complex business model. That materialism is part of the issue, too. You can't ever escape the churn, bit rot gets your drives and Hetzner doesn't sell a lifetime plan. If you're not computing for the short-term, you're arguably wasting your time.

I'm not against the idea of a disasterproof runtime, but you're not "pushing back" against the consumerist machine by outlasting it. When high-quality software becomes inaccessible to support some sort of longtermist runtime, low-quality software everywhere sees a rise in popularity.

iancmceachern

I totally agree

JKCalhoun

Surprised he was only at Apple for 12 years. A wild ride, I'm sure.

When I moved out to "the Valley" in 1995, the apartment I picked out turned out to be right next to General Magic (on Mary Ave.).

I knew it as a "spin off" of Apple but at the time did not know the luminaries that were there. It was just a cute rabbit in a hat logo — lit up when I got home late and was turning off to my apartment.

null

[deleted]

JKCalhoun

> Inspired by a mind-expanding LSD journey in 1985, I designed the HyperCard authoring system that enabled non-programmers to make their own interactive media.

Watching some YouTube about the Beatles and, of course, their LSD trips. More recently the history of Robert Crumb — on his big acid trip he more or less created a large part of his stable of comic characters.

Somewhere along the way, someone said that LSD alters your mind permanently....

It caused me to wonder if we'll never get the genius of Beatles music, Crumb art without the artist taking something conscious-altering like LSD. Of course then I have to consider all the artists before LSD was "invented" — the Edvard Munch's, T.S. Eliot's, William Blake's, etc.

(Tried acid once in college. That was enough of that.)

nine_k

All traditional practices of use of psychedelic substances emphasize the importance of preparation, having the right state of mind, right stimuli / environment, and sitters in un-altered state of mind nearby.

LSD is not known to permanently alter brain; for that you need psilocybin.

j_bum

You had me up until your last clause…

If you understand that LSD doesn’t permanently alter the brain, why do you think PY “permanently” alters the brain? It does alter the brain (like LSD; see the plethora of research on PY altering neurogenesis and functional connectivity [0]), I’m unsure of what you mean by “permanent”.

[0] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07624-5

nine_k

AFAICT there exists no conclusive biomedical evidence of permanent physiological effects of LSD. This may mean we're just not looking hard enough, but there's no certainty.

For psilocybin, there is plenty, e.g.: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8376772/

TechDebtDevin

It permanently changed my buddy's brain when we were in college doing it. He thought he was talkng to God and blew his brains out. Not worth it for me now.

paulryanrogers

Survivorship bias? Plenty of brilliant people smoked tobacco. I didn't think more smoking will produce more brilliance.

tough

Neither does smoking alter your conscioudness in any remarkable way further than irritability or cravings due to whitdrawal symtpom

at least acid doesnt make sense to consume daily because it stops having the same effects the more you consume it

pyinstallwoes

Pretty ancient practice probably. See the history of drug use in cultures and spirituality/art. Soma, etc.

swyx

> Inspired by a mind-expanding LSD journey in 1985, I designed the HyperCard authoring system that enabled non-programmers to make their own interactive media.

I'm interested in how to do "good" journeys vs non-good ones...

gyomu

"I worked at Apple for 12 years, making tools to empower creative people [...]"

I think this was the hook that got many of us to admire Apple as a company (and more broadly, to get excited about computing as a discipline/industry). For a long time, that was arguably (one of) their primary mission.

I suspect to what extent it could still be considered to be the case today would be subject to much debate.

mehulashah

Legend. I still remember first putting my hands on a Mac, and the joy of computing that ensued in high school. I could get lost in the computer for days. Thank you, Bill.

JKCalhoun

Yeah, I think it was MacPaint actually.

9d

I had that feeling too.

How do we get it back?

How do we share it with others?

There has to be a way.

WillAdams

I am looking forward to trying to make use of a Raspberry Pi 5 as much as is feasible once I get a small tablet shell for mine.

If it works out well, I'm going to see about getting a Wacom One display tablet with touch.

paulryanrogers

> How do we get it back?

Time machine.

> How do we share it with others?

Just like the church, capture them in their most formative years.

9d

No. There has to be a way.

jonstewart

I have been thinking about this more, about how I spent hours and days exploring everything of my family’s new Mac SE, and then HyperCard, and creating with it.

There is an aspect of creativity that comes from being inspired, taking off from others’ ideas.

But there is also an aspect of creativity that’s more ascetic, and requires being bored—when there’s nothing else to do, turn the computer into a toy, to play with it, so you are not bored. And I am increasingly of the opinion getting to that state, at least for me, requires turning off the internet.

9d

100% agree, you must be bored to be inspired.

I think I know how to recapture that "whole new world" feeling and share it.

It's on the tip of my tongue, and has been for a while.

But I can't fully see it yet. I need to go offline for a while. You're right.

acheron

I was wondering recently about where the original sin of “light mode” came from. Guess it was him!

> The Apple II displayed white text on a black background. I argued that to do graphics properly we had to switch to a white background like paper. It works fine to invert text when printing, but it would not work for a photo to be printed in negative. The Lisa hardware team complained the screen would flicker too much, and they would need faster refresh with more expensive RAM to prevent smearing when scrolling. Steve listened to all the pros and cons then sided with a white background for the sake of graphics.

wpm

“Sin” of being readable

monkeyelite

The real sin is having both.

throwanem

I don't get it. I grew up with green and amber CRTs and I don't miss those days at all. What makes it mean so much, to you kids who never knew those days to miss?

floren

Looks cooler, and you tell yourself that you're saving your eyes as you sit in your blackout-curtained hacker den... but the pitch black hacker den is also part of the desired aesthetic.

Real Hackers didn't use rgb dweeb keyboards though

Waterluvian

It feels a bit like he wrote his own obituary with this.

bravesoul2

Maybe he did. We are all going to die. And if you have an interesting story (of interest to many) it's good to share it.

duxup

I find myself, as I get older, telling stories that have a similar perspective flow. It happens.

mrcwinn

Just had a flashback to the thunk sound of turning on Apple Lisa!

Grateful for all his work.

9d

> It was exciting working at Apple, knowing that whatever we invented would be used by millions of people.

I admit it is exciting to make something you truly believe is good and helpful.

And that it's disappointing when that thing isn't used by anyone.

It's even worse when it turns out it's just not that useful.

But in the end, everything is replaced anyway. So I guess it's fine.

roughly

> I admit it is exciting to make something you truly believe is good and helpful.

I want to double down on this - I’m lucky enough to have worked places where I truly believed the world would be a better place if we “won,” and not on the margins, and it really, really makes a difference in quality of life. I’ve worked at other places, too, and the cognitive drag of knowing that your skills and efforts - your ability to change the world - is at best being wasted is something you don’t truly feel until it’s gone.

9d

I've wasted countless years on pursuits I thought were good but later determined to have been bad, and therefore deeply regretted. I don't wish this on anyone.

I've also wasted countless years on pursuits I still think were good but overall never truly helped make the world better. This was less bad and seems inevitable.

roughly

Yeah I got a couple places on my resume I don’t like to talk about anymore. Turns out an awful lot of things are bad for the world in the wrong hands.

Still, if I’m going to spend a third of my life on something - and, more importantly, if I’m going to be responsible for my efforts contributing to something - I’d prefer it be something I find value in. I’ll take the risk of being wrong - although I’m certainly looking at the world through less rose-tinted glasses than I used to.

walterbell

> whatever we invented would be used by millions of people

Two billion active Apple devices in 2025.

9d

I was reflecting on his thoughts and my life's work.

zoky

I mean, as long as the average number of Apple devices per person is > 2 (which seems pretty likely, I have three on me right now), that’s still technically in the millions range.