Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

Find the Odd Disk

Find the Odd Disk

63 comments

·April 20, 2025

1970-01-01

Not bad, I only missed 2 on purple and 2 on brown. It seems those laser safety and solar eclipse goggles do indeed work!

zootboy

I wish this had a "I can't tell" option. A few of the really hard ones I got right, but I'd say it was more of a lucky guess than a genuine ability to discriminate the difference.

Freak_NL

Quite. With the odds being 1 to 3 you'll pick the right one when you have to click one at random to proceed, the results get skewed.

Retr0id

If you repeat the test a few times, it'll average out.

lucb1e

That's why there's 20 rounds I guess. If you could just press "all the same" it wouldn't have to be as many

layer8

This is from the creator of the ScienceClic YouTube channel [0]:

“As part of the next video, which will be out in a few weeks, l'd like to invite you to take part in an experiment about color perception. If you don't experience color blindness, l'd greatly appreciate it if you could take this test. Feel free to try it as many times as you like, think about it as a game!”

[0] https://youtube.com/@scienceclicen

lucb1e

I was wondering if it got harder or if it's just random:

    function generateColors(difficulty, blacklist) {
        ...
        let sample = Math.floor(Math.min(Math.max(0, 1-Math.pow(1-difficulty, 1.5)), .99)*5);
        let distance = (5 - sample)/5;
        ...
    }
    function setupRound(blacklist) {
        ...
        const data = generateColors(currentRound/totalRounds, blacklist);
        ...
    }
Plotting that first magic: https://lucb1e.com/randomprojects/js/testformula.htm#%24%28%...

    round#  difference
     0-- 2  5
     3-- 5  4
     6-- 9  3
    10--13  2
    14--20  1
The "blacklist" parameter prevents that you get the same challenge twice. Note also that it submits every answer to the server (fine imo, but I think it would be even nicer if this was mentioned on the page)

tennysont

lucb1e

Happy to hear, though note the file is without l (lowercase L) in the end (I guess autocorrupt is to blame here?). Fun fact: if you remove the filename, it'll show you all the crap in that directory, listing this file as being last modified in 2015-09-27. If past performance is an indicator, it should be stable to use for the next ten years as well :D

susam

19/20 - <https://i.imgur.com/GplfQbO.png>

By the way, I keep Night Shift enabled all the time: <https://i.imgur.com/LGkSlJZ.png>. I don't know how much it matters in a game like this.

See also <https://susam.net/myrgb.html> for a colour guessing game I wrote last year.

tripdout

17 out of 20. Was super easy until #10 and I had to stop and think more carefully (which was actually my first mistake), and then I got #14 and #15 wrong. The score was about what I expected, though - would've been surprised if it was <15 correct.

I wonder how much of this would come down to screen calibration / color accuracy? If everything's consistently off in 1 direction I guess not much, but I would imagine certain shades might appear effectively the same on some cheaper screens?

nkrisc

Would be interesting to get some basic analysis of my results. From a glance it appeared that the ones I missed (6) tended towards red. The low saturation ones and green ones I found to be easiest, but was there any actual significance of the distribution of my errors? Simply too small a set to say?

hilbert42

I got the same number wrong but I've passed every Ishihara test ever thrown at me. I did this test on a cheap mobile that's not calibrated, so it's anyone guess what its gamma and transfer curves are like.

One should only take such tests seriously if one's using a properly calibrated monitor and it's viewed under ideal viewing conditions.

robertclaus

Interesting! All of my misses were blue leaning a bit towards violet.

fallinghawks

19/20. The first many were very obvious. I missed #14 and I think right around there I started to slow down because the differences were getting smaller. Looking away and then coming back helped, I think. It seemed like if you look at them too long, whichever circle you're looking at seems to shift color and it becomes really hard to discern the difference.

blueflow

How much of the result is vision accuracy and how much is dependant of the display?

hilbert42

As I've mentioned, you can't take this seriously unless you've a properly calibrated monitor.

wtallis

Calibrating a monitor is intended to ensure that colors on your monitor closely match colors on an ideal reference monitor. That's not the same thing as ensuring that two different colors on the same monitor actually show up differently; that's a much looser quality standard, because even a badly mis-calibrated monitor may still show both colors as distinct wrong colors.

I would only expect poor calibration to break this test for colors near the edge of the display's gamut, or if there's a drastic-enough shift that the color space's lack of perceptual uniformity means a numerical difference that should have been visible ends up in a different part of the color space where that same numerical difference is not perceptible.

havan_agrawal

Shouldn't there also be a few "control" challenges sprinkled in where all three are the same color and there's no "right" answer? If the test is implemented well and/or there is no human bias (either from the previous question or from the positioning of the circles), then you'd expect to see a uniform distribution of answers on the control. If there is bias (e.g. some innate preference for the top circle (say)), that should get adjusted for in the final analysis.

wrs

Toward the end, I think the confounding effect of the afterimages of the discs was bigger than the difference between the discs. (That is, when looking at the three discs in turn, the effect of the afterimage of disc 1 on judging disc 2, etc.)

aimor

I noticed this too. I did much better covering up two of the disks and looking at them one at a time, or comparing pairs of disks.

Retr0id

Interesting. I only got 15/20, and previously considered myself "above average" at colour distinction tests but based on other replies that's not an especially good score. I'll try again, going more carefully.

thechao

I have poor color discrimination, but excellent flicker detection (?). This last skill was discovered by the senior devs when I was doing GPU driver debug, and “we” were looking for an extremely transient high-refresh rate tile clear issue. The issue only occurred at 120Hz (or higher) refresh rate with solid clear color on a large screen, with nearly identical colors. About one 4x8 pixel tile every minute or so. That was a boring few days, let me tell you.

Retr0id

Ah, yes, 19/20 the second time (only the last one wrong).

The first time I kept my eyes fixed in the same place roughly in the middle which clearly wasn't a good idea. On the second attempt I glanced between each circle in turn, trying to discern the difference over two points in time rather than two points in space.