Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

A recent study suggests that insects branched out from crustaceans

adrian_b

The title should mention the 2023 year, as reference for "recent".

As explained in the article, this is actually old news.

There has been more than a decade since it is well known that the hexapods a.k.a. insects have evolved from within a certain group of crustaceans, which includes the water fleas.

The 2023 research paper linked in the article has only provided stronger evidence for this.

The main implication of this discovery is that the myriapods (e.g. millipedes and centipedes) are much more remotely related to insects than it has been believed in the past and they have adapted to a terrestrial life completely independently and much earlier than the insects (the invasion of the land by major animal groups has happened in the order myriapods, then arachnids, then hexapods a.k.a. insects, then tetrapod vertebrates, by a coincidence in decreasing order of the number of legs).

Imnimo

I'm so used to seeing the "fish crawling onto the shore" cartoon of evolution that I assumed the branching always went that way - land creatures are branchoffs of sea creatures. But surely this is oversimplified - are there examples in the other direction, where a branching occured in land animals and one branch then returned to the sea?

showerst

I think all marine mammals fit this, right?

Calavar

Yes. And for a non animal example, there's sea grass, which evolved from land grasses.

SideburnsOfDoom

And for an animal but non-mammal example, there are penguins.

nonameiguess

Mangroves are aquatic trees that evolved from regular land trees.

nyanpasu64

Sea grass is a monocot but belongs to a different order (Alismatales) than true grass (Poales).

chasil

ajross

Also ichthyosaurs' ancestors were terrestrial reptiles, though the whole branch is now extinct.

maxbond

Not an animal, but many marine algae descend from freshwater algae, possibly because the last Snowball Earth event may have wiped out the marine algae by covering the oceans with ice (while freshwater algae survived in structures like cryoconites, tiny freshwater puddles that form on glaciers).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0R3FVTLvT0

(People who know their taxonomy will notice that I'm conflating algae and cyanobacteria, mea culpa.)

nn3

There are also lots of extinct examples like Ichthyosaurs, Mosasaurs, Plesiosaurs

Modern examples are saltwater crocodiles, sea turtles or sea snakes

nyanpasu64

> Hyraxes have highly charged myoglobin, which has been inferred to reflect an aquatic ancestry.[20]

lmpdev

Interesting thing about the evolution of Hyraxes is that it is likely to be an example of a Hard Polytomy - as in Hyraxes, Elephants and Manatees split off simultaneously

SideburnsOfDoom

I knew that Hyraxes were related to elephants, And I've seen rock hyraxes in the wild many times, but TIL the term "Hard Polytomy" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polytomy

yndoendo

Hippos come from the whale branch. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whippomorpha

elevaet

Hippos don't come from the whale branch, but they share a branch with whales. From wikipedia:

> It is unknown whether the last common ancestor of whales and hippos led an aquatic, semiaquatic/amphibious, or terrestrial lifestyle

However, whales are a great example of a clade that went land -> water in their evolutionary history.

dcminter

Whales are the first example that springs to mind.

abeindoria

I strongly suggest reading Neil Shubin's "Your Inner Fish" which explains a bit more on how different bits etc evolved if you're interested in the topic.

dboreham

Makes sense: a coastal cave is a great environment where an organism can experiment with moving from water to land.

This article also nicely highlights how some scientists can just make stuff up, subsequently overturned when someone finds a fact-based way to evaluate their erroneous conclusions. See also archeology.

nmstoker

For a fairly science focused article I was a little surprised they referred to "bugs" in the casual / technically incorrect manner, as covered here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insect#Distinguishing_featur...

nescioquid

As a lay-person who likes to read about bugs, I've come to expect the qualifier "true" to connote something special about bug's "mouth parts".

dhosek

“Bats: Bug Scourge of the Skies!“

willis936

I suspect crustacean allergies are actually arthropod allergies. I haven't seen much research on this though.

xipho

I suspect arthropods are way too diverse to fall under a single umbrella of "is_allergic". Millions of years of evolution can produce very radically different things for our bodies to worry about. Just the fact that there are no marine insects (completing their lifecycle within an ocean) tells us something about how different their biologies, and therefor allergenic "surface" are. Poison pathways from venom can target completely different systems in a humans.

andrewflnr

Almost no marine insects. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halobates

Re lifecycle:

> The coastal species lay their eggs close to the water surface on rocks, plants, and other structures near the shore, while the oceanic species attach their egg masses on floating objects such as cuttlebone and feathers.

xipho

I know of Halobates, they live on top the ocean, not in the ocean. I.e. they have no adaptations to breathe in salt water. There are many other species like this that are restricted to tidal (flies, parasitic wasps, etc.) or costal areas and nowhere else, but again, not under water.

null

[deleted]

willis936

Okay but they both have exoskeletons that have many shared proteins. Allergies are just a protein check.

echelon

It's an allergic reaction to tropomyosin, which is found in shellfish and cockroaches.

I recall an anecdote of an entomologist who studied cockroaches in particular claiming to have developed a shellfish allergy from her work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropomyosin

saghm

If this were a sci-fi movie, it would be because the cockroaches were sentient and trying to protect themselves.

senkora

People with shellfish allergies are generally advised to avoid eating crickets for this reason.

ljsprague

SideburnsOfDoom

There seem to be a lot of semi-terrestrial shrimp. The article mentions "beach-hoppers" or "sandhoppers", which are this long list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talitridae

AIPedant

Woodlice - e.g pillbugs / roly-polies - aren't shrimp, but they are crustaceans, probably evolving from something like a trilobite.

null

[deleted]

null

[deleted]

anigbrowl

I'm surprised to learn anyone thought otherwise.

pfdietz

The previous theory, it seems to me, is that crustaceans and insects were separate -- that is, they shared a common ancestor, but each is a clade. The new idea is that insects are slotted inside the larger tree of crustaceans, and are more related to some crustaceans than to others.

upghost

whoa whoa whoa I was told everything evolves into crabs[1]:

[1]: https://xkcd.com/2314/

fallat

This seems so obvious

CommenterPerson

Biology was always a mystery in college, but I have also felt that this was obvious. They look very similar for heaven's sake! My paranoid self thinks shrimp, crabs and lobsters are labeled differently from bugs, so people can eat them without being repulsed.

andrewflnr

Compared to the alternative that, IIRC, insects are closer to myriapods? Crustaceans aren't the only crunchy animals, even after this reorganization.