Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

Japanese scientists create new plastic that dissolves in saltwater overnight

h4ck_th3_pl4n3t

Actual source (source of source of source):

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ado1782

More research from Takuzo Aida, which is quite impressive to read how they got there:

https://www.science.org/authored-by/Aida/Takuzo

araes

Science article also has some test apparatus images, heat processed finished plastic images, and images of the plastic under attack by several different solvents (hexane, CH2Cl2, THF, Acetone, MeOH, DMF).

Also has stress-strain curves of the material, and behavior when used in glued together boxes for packaging.

Generally, if it actually gets made in quantity, seems like it would be an improvement for somewhere like Japan. Last time I read about Japan on this type of subject, it was examining the outlets of metropolitan streams, and the huge quantities of trash that people just wash down to the oceans. (Notably, from the perspective of considerate people trying to figure out ways to keep the beaches clean and deal with the upstream polluters).

jokoon

Not sure if that thing could be used as food packaging, since food has salt and water.

Also that means this plastic probably has a very short lifespan.

chongli

Your remark hints at the fundamental problem with plastics: lifespan and chemical resistance. We worked so hard to develop plastics which have a long lifespan and high chemical resistance which makes them extremely versatile for containers and structures we don’t want to fall apart on their own.

At the same time, it’s these exact same properties of plastics which make them non-biodegradable and resistant to being broken down by the human body’s immune system and waste removal processes. The advantages we developed them for are also the disadvantages we’re trying to replace them for.

In the end, what we truly want is a product that lasts as long as we want and no longer. Something that’s indestructible while it’s in use but can be decomposed and recycled instantly with the push of a button. This is a paradox!

jorvi

It's not really a fundamental problem if plastic was only used for things that are meant to stay whole a long time. Say an RFID tag or a piece of trim on a car.

Currently we put supermarket-made perishable salads in a plastic container, we wrap the container in plastic, we put a plastic strip lid on it, and we put the oil and nuts in two separate plastic wrappers inside the plastic container. That is ludicrous insanity for something that perishes in a couple of days max.

aeonik

This is true, but there are escape hatches to this, so it's not a true paradox.

A few examples: If we could get a glass that melts at a lower temperature and is more impact resistant, we'd be halfway there.

Also, if we could easily melt down the plastic without degradation, that would be nice as well.

Also, if we could easily dissolve the plastic in a solvent that wasn't highly toxic. That would be great too.

Basically if we could make the containers out something that makes it easy to reshape and reuse, we could convince more people to collect most of the waste. It would be more valuable as an input to many different crafting or manufacturing processes.

But also, wood is kind of polymer, and chemical is pretty similar to plastic, and there are a lot of different kind of plastics out there, they are all pretty different, so it's a bit hard to generalize in this area.

card_zero

The article mentions a hydrophobic coating, like a fence around the plastic: once breached by a scratch (or by being crushed) the coating no longer keeps salt water out.

I wonder whether the coating itself is made from something terrible. In principle, though, there's your "push of a button": throw the plastic bottle in a trash compactor, break through the coating, now it dissolves in the sea.

culopatin

So like cardboard boxes then.

threatofrain

Plastic containers have many strengths, but if we consider a subset then glass is a competitor. In some sense we can have a great container and not worry about substances leeching into food, it just won't be as lightweight and trivial as plastic.

dylan604

Would the average consumer be willing to accept the price increase due to the weight of glass containers vs plastic? The heavier glass will cost the vendor more in shipping on top of the container itself. That's shipping from the glass maker to the bottling facility, shipping from the bottling facility to the distribution center, shipping from distro to retail. There could then be additional shipping from retail to consumer.

Glass would also be much more susceptible to storage temperatures. Liquids susceptible to temps below freezing could be bad for glass containers without enough room for contents expansion.

silisili

It's what makes sense. I don't think it's that hard given materials available, I think companies just forego putting thought into it because customers don't care and will claim their products are weak and not long lasting, while having to spend more money for the problem.

Things like sandwich containers/wrappers shouldn't even be plastic to begin with. A salad container should probably not have a lifespan of much more than a week or so. A disposable cup should probably be designed to hold liquid for a period of something like 12-24h then rapidly degrade under liquid.

I'd love to see more alternatives pop up in the short term, whether it's natural wax paper, banana leaves, hollowed out shells or gourds, some type of thin wood, etc. But plastic is just so cheap and ubiquitous it's a hard thing to convince a company to do.

c22

> A disposable cup should probably be designed to hold liquid for a period of something like 12-24h then rapidly degrade under liquid.

As someone who once received a beverage in just such a disposable cup and then left it in my car overnight I have to say screw this idea.

analog31

Those properties also coincide with being less toxic. Greater chemical reactivity means more unknown stuff gets into your food.

Unfortunately, less toxic until its found that they aren't, like PFASs.

permo-w

is it a paradox? how unlikely is it that there's a plastic substance out there that can be quickly dissolved to bio-degradable substances but only using a relatively cheap and non-toxic solvent not present in most use cases for plastic? that's not a paradox, it's an engineering problem.

amelius

No, we did a bad job. Rocks are also resistant against many things. Yet, they are not as much a problem.

chongli

Asbestos is a rock. It makes a fantastic insulation (pretty much fireproof) but it's such a huge problem [1] that we have specialized workers who remove it from old buildings and perform the necessary cleanup to make the area safe.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wittenoom,_Western_Australia

barbazoo

> There’s one major hurdle with any degradable plastic material of course: what if it comes into contact with the catalyst for its destruction before you want it to? A plastic cup is no good if certain liquids can dissolve it, after all.

> In this case, the team found that applying hydrophobic coatings prevented any early breaking down of the material. When you eventually want to dispose of it, a simple scratch on the surface was enough to let the saltwater back in, allowing the material to dissolve just as quickly as the non-coated sheets.

Ancalagon

Is the coating made of PFAS, or wax?

6177c40f

Parylene C, a chlorocarbon: [1]

> Derivatives of parylene can be obtained by replacing hydrogen atoms on the phenyl ring or the aliphatic bridge by other functional groups. The most common of these variants is parylene C, which has one hydrogen atom in the aryl ring replaced by chlorine. [2]

[1] https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ado1782

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parylene#Permeability

ratg13

The primary mechanism for this to work is similar to “paper” straws

The product is coated in hydrophobic forever chemicals which protect the material ‘long enough’ before the core is compromised.

pas

it seems there are biodegradable coatings, like this

https://www.kit-technology.de/en/technology-offers/details/7...

Asooka

It would at least be useful for food delivery, since the packaging on that doesn't need to last more than a few hours tops.

porphyra

Also human hand sweat has both salt and water so anything that requires a human to carry them might not be suitable.

bgnn

Plastic should not be used as food packaging.

gitaarik

So what instead?

anticensor

Paper and glass.

nilslindemann

I love the idea, but we could use glass, cardboard, wood, fabric for 90% of the things we are currently packaging with plastic. The cheese I am just eating not just has plastic around, but even plastic between every single cheese slice. Stuns me that wasting resources like this does not get taxed.

skybrian

If an alternative is more expensive, it seems like we should at least consider whether it’s also wasting more resources? I would want to see the comparison done well, rather than simply assuming that plastic must be worse.

permo-w

it's not even necessarily about waste of resources. many microplastics and other complex oil-derived chemicals are quite obviously not [known to be] safe for human and other animals' health. we know pretty much for sure that most wood, glass types and natural fibres are safe.

honkycat

We don't bake cost of proper disposal into materials, that is why plastic is so cheap.

The Chinese manufacture the stuff like crazy and ships it all of SEA. Rural communities dump it into their rivers and all of that washes out into the ocean which ends up EVERYWHERE.

Plastic, and oil in general, has been a global ecologic CATASTROPHE.

Dylan16807

Cost of disposal for plastic is very small. You can get it into a well-made landfill for a couple pennies per pound in the US. Charging manufacturers an extra little fraction of a penny for an item isn't a bad idea but it wouldn't affect much. What matters is government desire to handle trash properly.

hedayet

This is great progress! If a solution like this can reduce global hard plastic usage by even 1%, that would be a massive impact.

It's encouraging to see smart people attacking this hard problem persistently, delivering new solutions, and inching us closer to a real breakthrough with each iteration.

krisoft

> If a solution like this can reduce global hard plastic usage by even 1%, that would be a massive impact.

I would understand if it reduces plastic pollution, but how could it reduce usage?

Y_Y

If this a good substitute for "hard plastic" then it could reduce usage by replacing it.

Dylan16807

But wouldn't the thing we're replacing it with also be a hard plastic? Then we're reducing the use of more persistent hard plastics but we're not reducing hard plastic use overall.

foundart

I read it as “by replacing use of some hard plastics”.

kikoreis

Through regulation?

jklinger410

Excited to never see this technology get used!

nashashmi

Looks like we can have plastic straws shamelessly now. And plastic cutlery as well.

ost-ing

Pollution is still seen as some technical problem even in 2025 but im not convinced. I think for decades I’ve read about some miracle substance that is environmentally friendly and can replace trad plastics. Decades later still virtually no practical movement in the space can be seen.

parineum

That's because this news is reported the same way that new battery breakthroughs are reported.

Creating a material in a lab is far from mass production and field testing.

deadbabe

Only three things in life are certain: taxes, death, and microplastics. And I’m not sure about the former.

goda90

This is a total guess, but I imagine some of our biggest uses for single-use plastic involves food containers, medical equipment, and protecting things from the elements during transit. A lot of times that means exposure to salty solutions. Dissolving overnight would probably be way too fast.

nonelog

> Dissolving overnight would probably be way too fast.

They addressed that issue, it's in the article.

tbalsam

I don't think they really did? A single scratch to cause it to break down doesn't seem like it would really be a scalable solution for any kind of mass produced material like this. Would cause chaos if any individual container went bad in a shipment, so it's not really addressed I feel. OP's concerns still stand.

directevolve

The next step is engineering a hydrophobic coating or other biodegradable packaging that offers an adequate level of resistance to accidental scratching for a particular application, and identifying applications that are tolerant to failure of the plastic or not exposed to salt water.

garbawarb

Simply wrap it in a protective plastic packaging.

xattt

> medical equipment

This will be perfect for IV bags!

moandcompany

Perfect for saline solution, right?

xattt

Now help me mop up this mess in the med room.

GloriousKoji

If it's been compromised then the whole thing just melts away.

foundart

What a great development. Commenters have noted various challenges that will need to be addressed but they seem largely solvable to me. I’ll definitely be keeping an eye on this as it moves from the lab to real applications.

honkycat

The fact we haven't globally banned single use plastic is incredibly stupid.

nonelog

What's the element that will have this invention NOT be killed by the usual suspects, though?

It's really not the first time something game-changing has been invented, only for it not be heard of ever again.

jerf

Making plastics out of sodium, phosphorus, and guanidinium ions [1] which the link characterizes as a "strong organic base", which is designed to break down and so will do so not just in the ocean, suggests to me that there are enough engineering disadvantages the article is not talking about that we'll probably never see this in real life.

It's chemically quite distant from traditional plastics.

The ocean may not care about some extra sodium and phosphorus... and then again, if we made enough, maybe it would... but I'll graciously assume for now it wouldn't, but the other places this would inevitably end up breaking down would probably not appreciate the resulting mess. I have to imagine any quantity of this in a fire near humans would be a fairly substantial problem of some sort. I don't know exactly what would pop out but it's got some awfully "exciting" feedstock going in to it with that sodium and phosphorus.

[1]: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/guanidinium#sectio...

jabroni_salad

The guys marketing these things are really hoping that you have forgotten the law of conservation of mass.

The ultimate problem with these dissolving plastics is that they are still plastic after they dissolve, it's just that they are invisible microplastics instead of visible objects. They largely aren't captured at WWTP and end up in the water supply.

thunkingdeep

Realistically? Taxes and tax enforcement. That’s really the only consistent and persistent way to change the incentives of the world’s economies. In most developed economies, the ultra wealthy are able to avoid paying their fair share, and the same goes for large corporations as well.

Without fairness, there’s really no easy way to talk about strategy.

parineum

What's a fair share?

I don't get how this phrase has got ao much traction from the people who are in support of various social safety net programs that are specifically designed to benefit those who don't pay their fair share.

If you and I split a pizza and I pay for none but eat half, is that fair? Even if I'm poor and your rich, that's not fair.

It might be right, it might be good but it's certainly not fair.

thunkingdeep

In the context of taxes and tax enforcement, I have no choice but to assume you are being intentionally obtuse as to what I mean by “fair share”

DanielHB

I dunno, I am sure the plastic industry would be thrilled to be able to get around environment concerns.

Mistletoe

Probably the same thing that kills everything- cost and/or durability/usability.

mrguyorama

This isn't game changing? We ALREADY have biodegradable containers that degrade in salt water overnight and can be prevented from degrading with a coating that can then be breached by a scratch:

It's called paper. I've used paper products with a hydrophobic coating (which means plastic, consumers don't like wax coatings that much) for decades. They don't solve the problem, because the plastic coating still fills us with microplastics.

Maybe it cuts down on how much plastic is produced and thrown away, but we could have done this 20 years ago!

There's no conspiracy thwarting "game changing" research to maintain some status quo, though there ARE often political factions who push for maintenance of the status quo.

This is marketing. The people who write this stuff are marketers and they usually don't understand the research in the first place!

This is why, despite everyone insisting that there are hundreds of "This will revolutionize batteries" that everyone complains never materialize, we have actually seen them materialize as lithium batteries like doubling in capacity over a decade. The marketing material overpromised, though the research was fruitful.

Because it's marketing.