Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

'Dogequest' Site Claims to Dox Tesla Owners Across the U.S.

Jcampuzano2

So are we really going down the road of telling people "Hey just buy a new car" whenever yours is politically inconvenient?

The car already has low resale value, and if they did sell it it doesn't get it off the road. I do own one, and honestly I hate driving it around now because of the stigma but its the only car I have and while yes I could sell it at a massive loss thats both a lot of work and a waste of my time, effort, and money.

It was literally the first car I ever bought and was because I liked the convenience of EV's and for the environment. Now I feel like I'm being punished for it through no fault of my own and always have to look over my shoulders, and I don't even like Elon in the first place and never really cared for him.

soraminazuki

It's obviously wrong to harass innocent people. But at the same time, Tesla is so anti-consumer that switching cars might actually be beneficial. Tesla workers were caught spying on car owners through the camera, sharing in internal chat videos of people doing "really intimate things" or approaching the car "completely naked." Not only that, they were photoshopping it and memeing. It shows a culture of complete moral breakdown in the company. I definitely wouldn't want a Tesla in my home, even without the current political events.

https://www.reuters.com/technology/tesla-workers-shared-sens...

AlecSchueler

> So are we really going down the road of telling people "Hey just buy a new car" whenever yours is politically inconvenient?

Can't things be exceptional? "Inconvenient" seems to go very far in diminishing what's happening here, and I think your point would come across very differently without the understatement. Is there really no line he could cross where you would stop calling his politics an "inconvenience" and support direct actions being taken? (Not necessarily this action in particular)

I understand the stigma is painful but I would implore you to consider how that pain affects your outlook and perhaps makes you feel more sympathy for the company than you otherwise would.

mlindner

The only people who think this is more than "politically inconvenient" are terminally online and aren't really seeing reality for what it is.

The people pushing for vandalism of these vehicles are way worse than Elon has ever been.

AlecSchueler

And the only people who begin an argument with an ad hominem understand they have no argument at all.

I don't believe that the people who are dying in Ukraine after Starlink pulled out struggled to see reality as the bombs fell. I don't believe that all of the "parasites" as Musk calls them were terminally online before they lost their social security. I'm sure the many veterans he made jobless had a good dose of reality on the battlefield while serving the US. I don't believe that the leaders of so many countries in Europe and America are spending all of their time doomscrolling and I don't think Germany is starting investigations into electoral fraud on the basis of something they saw being terminally online.

And is this worse than what he's done? There are no calls for vandalism, it's only personal details. There was no threat implied wegen he shared the personal details of the daughter of a judge he disagreed with with millions of people right?

chneu

Tell that to the thousands who have lost their jobs in careers they no longer feel comfortable pursuing.

Claiming only those who are "terminally online" think this is more than inconvenient is an amazing display of either privilege or not giving a crap. Either way, lol calling kettle.

soraminazuki

> way worse than Elon has ever been

Seriously? Vandalizing innocent people's property is wrong, but ransacking government institutions is far worse and much more consequential. There's an order of magnitude difference in the number of victims and the ways in which they're affected, which includes death.

Death, you ask? Gutting health agencies, pollution regulators, or international efforts to prevent the spread of disease will all lead to increased numbers of death.

However, it seems that when the scale of the crime outgrows a certain threshold, the perceived severity goes down somehow. It's depressing.

null

[deleted]

kshmir

I just love the Tesla, why would I care about what other people say? It works better everyday.

base698

The argument goes: Because 3% of the population is antisocial personality disorder in the screens on TV and the internet tell them it's okay to commit violence against you because Nazis.

You may not care but the crazy people care a lot.

kshmir

I still don't care. I may just buy another Tesla and a handgun :)

Marsymars

> Now I feel like I'm being punished for it through no fault of my own

Maybe, but something like 90%+ of all Teslas sold were manufactured after Tesla the company was already on my blacklist due to the ethical issues with supporting Musk.

(There are a number of companies on my blacklist, but off the top of my head I can't recall any others that are specifically there because of the singular actions of an owner.)

dvt

If you own Apple or Nike products, you're supporting child slavery. If you own products made in China, you're supporting religious genocide. "Blacklisting" companies is just lazy slacktivism that only someone in the middle-to-upper class Twittersphere (or Blueskysphere) would ever partake in.

Murder & terrorism are morally impermissible, but at least Luigi, or the Unabomber, or the Proud Boys put their lives on the line for whatever ideas (good or bad, you decide) they had. Testicular fortitude that only extends to Hacker News is not very convincing.

What do I do to make the world a slightly better place? I volunteer at my local church and at homeless shelters, I donate, I help my neighbors, I clean up the beach, I organize community gatherings. Enough online activism with grandiose ideas, start with making a small positive change in your local community.

maximinus_thrax

That's a lot of words to rant at someone performing the most basic principles of capitalism, which is voting with their wallet.

tekknik

why is your blacklist important? also isn’t it supposed to be called something other than “blacklist” now?

__MatrixMan__

Right, I think the new term is hitlist.

dzhiurgis

Found typical Jalopnik reader

thechao

Tesla owner; same boat. I think Austin has voted with its doors enough for me to get the idea, at this point. I got the car in 2001, and it should be good for another 5–7 yrs as my daily commuter. I'm just resigned to my dingy fate, now.

The next car has to be a long hauler; we're looking at hybrid SUV/minivans. After that ... I hope Aptera is shipping.

doge1776

I’m in Austin and have a Tesla (which I bought new) and I love it. Next car will be another new Tesla as well. Austin loves teslas, they’re everywhere. A handful of degenerate leftists isn’t scaring anyone.

outer_web

2001 Tesla wow.

genewitch

Saturn EV1, I'm still mad you couldn't buy one.

thechao

2021. Just a typo... although, I love the weird downvotes.

xnx

> I got the car in 2001

It's an extremely rare prototype from 2 years before the company was founded. /s

tzs

> So are we really going down the road of telling people "Hey just buy a new car" whenever yours is politically inconvenient?

I suspect this will be a one time thing because I don't think any other carmaker CEO will do the kind of things Musk is doing.

poeao

True most CEOs are too cowardly to try to save us from $50 trillion in debt and financial collapse. Fighting the government jobs program of non productive people is something most don’t want to do.

__MatrixMan__

If he wanted to do those things with the consent of the people, he could have run for public office. Buying his way in changes things significantly.

abduhl

>> most CEOs are too cowardly

Posted from a throwaway account created specifically for this post.

Cowardly indeed.

__MatrixMan__

I hope people aren't being excessively cruel, but...

> through no fault of my own

Giving money to an enemy of the people should have consequences, even after the fact. That's how we prevent it from happening in the future.

bbarnett

This is an absolutely absurd comment.

This election changed perceptions. Punishing someone after perceptions have changed is morally bankrupt behaviour. This person could have bought their car pre-twitter, waay before perception change, and certainly stated a buy due to environmental concerns.

This sort of blind political hatred against innocents is literally this biggest problem with America today.

__MatrixMan__

If you give somebody money, and they do harmful things with that money, then you are partially at fault. It's not political hatred, I just want people to take some responsibility for their actions.

I don't want to see anybody harmed, or have to take losses beyond the abysmal resale value of their car, but if developing an economy that is compatible with democracy means hurting some feelings along the way, well that sucks but it may be a necessary evil.

anonfordays

>Giving money to an enemy of the people should have consequences, even after the fact. That's how we prevent it from happening in the future.

I'll remember this comment when conservatives are the ones destroying something because the owner/CEO/etc. are Marxist child groomers or whatever. They'll be justified because giving money to an enemy of the people should have consequences, even after the fact. That's how we prevent it from happening in the future.

__MatrixMan__

If what is being destroyed is a bunch of stock prices, and if the owner/CEO/etc. is under fire for using their wallet to disproportionally influence politics, then yeah more power to 'em. It's not about sending a message from left to right, but rather from bottom to top:

> Your contribution to politics should be 1 vote and 0 dollars, or else.

sMarsIntruder

This is complete madness.

So, you define who is an “enemy of the people”?

You’re more dangerous than the “problem” itself.

__MatrixMan__

No, everybody does. And they talk to each other about it, and this affects prices and how investments are allocated, which determines whether and which people have government-influencing amounts of power.

I'm not proposing we trash his Tesla, I'm proposing that we maintain the stigma. For better or worse this is how markets work, so lets use them.

jarsin

What's crazy is this was always seen as a left wing car. If you drove one of these into small blue collar towns there is a chance you would have been harassed a few short years ago.

dzhiurgis

Far left and antifa always hated Tesla tho. But I also suspect antifa is just Russian trolls financed by oil money.

anigbrowl

Sounds made up. I live in a very lefty part of the Bay Area in California where Teslas abound, and there has never been any kind of campaign against them until recently, just some cynicism about Musk's grandiose claims.

My impression from reading your other comments is that you don't even live in the US. If that's wrong please correct me, but if not I think you should refrain from making counterfactual claims.

jarsin

I put Antifa into a whole other category called, Terrorist.

dgrin91

Thats some pretty shady shit. I have a relative who is mostly a-political and bought a Tesla years ago with the intention of being good for the environment. Now she has a target on her back? What?

JKCalhoun

I get the environment angle. In the current timeline though, personally I would be considering all the other EVs that are also good for the environment but don't have the albatross hanging around their ... rearview mirror.

Agree it's a cruel thing to do though. I prefer the "I humped Your Hummer" type site from a decade or so ago. More humorous. Definitely mostly harmless.

goosejuice

Which evs are those? Geely (polestar), Hyundai, and Lucid all have political baggage. GM caught up in Uyghur forced labor aluminum and sells driver data. Ford and most of the German and Italian automakers have fascist roots and were involved in forced labor. Many of them are owned by the same families implicated in those past decisions.

Rivian seems clean but they are more expensive, only SUVs, and aren't doing well financially. Even still you probably end up using superchargers.

rondini

What a ridiculous bad faith deflection. No other auto maker is explicitly and aggressively aligning itself with the current administration and their policies. Tesla’s CEO wants to associate his company with a political vision and is vocal about using his money to further that vision.

ben_w

> GM caught up in Uyghur forced labor aluminum and sells driver data.

I'd like the latter to be generally illegal (along with most of the analytics industry — just the other day I got a popup that wanted me to share my use of a website with 1604(!) partners, whereas my secondary school only had about 1000 students).

The former, I wish we could actually do something about, but China is so dominant on the world Aluminium markets that even if you didn't buy from them directly, all you're doing is substituting yourself for another buyer — boycotting Chinese aluminium is probably possible, but is like trying to get private individuals to boycott Nestlé.

> Ford and most of the German and Italian automakers have fascist roots and were involved in forced labor. Many of them are owned by the same families implicated in those past decisions.

Stuff that happened before most people alive today were born, and where the evil was systematically routed out immediately after WW2 right up until people decided there was a greater evil next door (in the form of the USSR), isn't going to upset people as much as hitching your wagon to a party that is currently doing as much as it can as fast as it can to undermine the USA's economic and global soft-power, while openly disregarding the sovereignty of two direct neighbours (including one he's a citizen of!), tweeting a well-technically about how many people Hitler killed, and doing something that is close enough to a Nazi salute to be unlawful to reproduce in Germany.

As for who to replace with, I don't know what their sales are like in the USA, but the Stellantis group collectively has a lot of brands.

rsynnott

> Ford and most of the German and Italian automakers have fascist roots and were involved in forced labor.

Thing is, everyone involved in that is dead, and in the case of the Germans the ownership has entirely changed (any continuity between today's VW and Gesellschaft zur Vorbereitung des Deutschen Volkswagens mbH is, well, incredibly tenuous, say). Like, it's hardly comparable to a company where the _current CEO_ is flouncing about doing Nazi salutes and tweeting Hitler apologia.

gonzo41

BYD just announced they can do full charges in 10 mins. The future is not Tesla.

base698

You should uncritically believe them, they have no reason to lie.

harambae

The Hyundai Ionia 5 could do nearly a full charge in 20 minutes, if you had access to a charger that basically no one did.

Wonder what the details are on this BYD claim.

selykg

Do Teslas even have functional rear view mirrors? I thought they did everything with cameras on the dash and only had as much shitty rear view mirror as necessary to not violate the law necessitating there be a rear view mirror.

outer_web

I didn't notice the 3's being particularly bad, the truck one is tiny, useless and presumably only there for compliance.

archon810

Only the Cybertruck is like that.

goosejuice

It's just like any other rear view mirror with auto dimming.

coldpie

> Now she has a target on her back?

Well, sort of. The real target is Musk & his wealth, which is in large part derived from Tesla. The people doing this want to harm Tesla, by making owning a Tesla unpleasant, which depresses Tesla car sales & values, which harms Musk & his wealth.

It does seem to be a somewhat effective approach: https://arstechnica.com/cars/2025/03/used-tesla-prices-tumbl...

I'm personally kind of neutral on the approach. It is the case that most Tesla owners are not awful people and don't really deserve to have their lives upset by this. On the other hand, society really doesn't have very many options when it comes to reigning in invincible monsters like Elon Musk. Is this approach ethical? Probably not. Is it also the best available option? Seems so. I don't know.

null

[deleted]

chgs

If you are a-political you implicitly support what’s happening.

ThrowawayR2

> "If you are a-political you implicitly support what’s happening."

Stop saying that. Stop stirring up people and instead let sleeping dogs lie.

From a detailed post-election analysis posted on HN earlier today (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43400172): "The reality is if all registered voters had turned out, then Donald Trump would’ve won the popular vote by 5 points [instead of 1.7 points]. So, I think that a “we need to turn up the temperature and mobilize everyone” strategy would’ve made things worse."

Lots of people are indifferent or even supported what's happening and if your side continues to harass them they'll come out in even bigger numbers to vote against your side in the midterms or 2028. Hectoring people for being apolitical has been a losing strategy so stop following it.

chgs

> Lots of people are indifferent or even supported what's happening

Yes. Yes they are.

We see the true face of Americans and what they really believe. Whether 51% or 49% of America wants this is basically irellevent.

Jcampuzano2

Ah so its just a "fuck you" if you just want to live a quiet life and care about your own life. Suddenly we have to be political and choose a side on every issue.

Come on man... its tiring as hell why can't people just be themselves. Why do we all have to be 100% connected to everything all the time.

raisedbyninjas

Unless you were raised by a pack of wolves in the wilderness, you're benefiting from the society that's been built by generations of your fellow man. Leeching off of that when it's convenient and living a private life when it's not, is a violation of the social contract.

patcon

As a Canadian, I feel quite exasperated and angry about how you frame this. Sounds very cowardly-American when your country is crumbling beneath you, taking the world down with it

outer_web

Apolitical or 100% connected. Zero middle ground.

chgs

Because when the people around you are suffering it is connected.

quickslowdown

Yes, it is. At this moment in time, none of us get the luxury of a quiet, simple life. Burying your head in the sand & refusing to engage with the world around you is a choice, a tacit support of what's keeping you from that ideal life you want.

It's a very tone deaf & privileged stand to complain about how an authoritarian government is making your life harder. If you're not being mistakenly imprisoned or actively hunted, the options are to join the resistance, or put your tail between your legs, let the government trample others' rights (and by proxy, your rights), and try to fool yourself into thinking you can just let things blow over.

If you're not joining in the resistance and you're instead choosing to sit out the fight for your freedoms & rights, you don't get to criticize the people who ARE fighting. They're fighting for themselves & their loved ones, and for you, whether you join in or not.

m3rc

She should sell it, it's important to make people who may have been "a-political" before aware of what's going on.

HolyLampshade

I’m not sure I follow the logic here. Let’s say a person owns a Tesla outright, and purchased it ignorant to Elon’s behavior (esp if prior to the last year or two). How does selling it benefit some cause? Tesla already has that person’s money. It’s purely a performative action?

billyp-rva

> Tesla already has that person’s money. It’s purely a performative action?

Car companies care deeply about resale value, since that directly impacts new car value.

hexator

Teslas require constant maintenance (like all cars, plus the recalls) and many have a subscription, it's not performative. Each Tesla owner is an asset to them post-sale.

mayneack

Destroying the market for used Teslas and the brand harms Elon Musk's personal wealth which he uses to achieve his personal political goals. Now you may or may not agree with that as a method, but the logic is straightforward.

Astronaut3315

It's not reasonable to expect someone to sell their primary mode of transportation, likely at a loss, for reasons out of their control.

AlecSchueler

But we have to suffer for their inaction. They have some small power to fight against it and are choosing not to. It's reasonable to watch people suffer or die but not to sell your car?

browningstreet

People are usually upside down on vehicle purchases for at least half of their finance period.

I know I am.. there's no selling my Tesla at this point. Not for a while, and probably not ever, the way things are going.

That said, I'm 100% for tanking TSLA stock down to $110 to make life very very miserable for Musk..

Marsymars

Why $110 specifically?

genewitch

Also sell toyota, nissan, folksvagen, Audi. Right? For the same reasons?

Glad I roll American coal!

ETA: i haven't driven a diesel in ~20 years, and it wasn't rolling coal. we have two japanese cars. If you can't detect the irony and self-deprecation in this comment, just move on.

KolmogorovComp

What’s your advice to the person who’d buy it then? Sell it again?

raisedbyninjas

There's value in the parts and eventually there will be scrap value.

netsharc

IMO this is a stupid "activism" move, similar to declaring people who stay silent on a topic (instead of joining your cause) as part of the problem. The activist declares that people not actively joining their protest are bad people.

Geez, guilt-tripping, what a great way to gain support for your movement.

patcon

I think it's maybe not as you understand. It's not a political movement -- they don't need your support. The goal is economic logic. It's trying to do economic damage to Tesla. No one needs to care if someone feels warm or cold about Tesla, they don't need to sell you or anyone but a very small subset on "a movement"... just that every rational actor has good reason to sell or never even buy.

netsharc

It's curious though, if the brand became so toxic/dangerous to own that no one could be caught owning one, and I want to sell my hypothetical Tesla, who's going to buy it? Nobody would want to own a molotov magnet (in this hypothetical scenario).

In the end it'll be hurting my wallet and not Elon's because I have to junk the car and buy a different brand.

Another scenario would be Teslas getting police escort and exclusive protected parking...

Volundr

To be clear, I'm not supporting damaging random Tesla's, just answering the questions asked.

> who's going to buy it? Nobody would want to own a molotov magnet

If nothing else, it has value as parts.

> In the end it'll be hurting my wallet and not Elon's because I have to junk the car and buy a different brand.

It hurts both. Nobody is going to buy Tesla is what they can look forward to a string of vandalism and eventually having to either sell it for a song or scrap it for parts. Tesla/Elon may already have the money from your current purchase, but destroying the second hand market and otherwise making it painful to own one reduces demand, and that hurts Elon's wallet.

walls

Make it Carvana / Carmax's problem, they'll take almost anything.

mc32

It is. This turns off lots of moderate people.

The only people that support these moves are the proverbial choir, and not even the whole choir but the really fervent members.

This will have a net negative on the movement. Long term it’s good for Tesla because ordinary people don’t like these types of shenanigans.

LightHugger

It turns moderate people against you more than it helps. Not sure where people get this idea that moderates react well to purity spirals directed at them.

mc32

Right. The problem is these kinds of groups don’t carry internal dissent (sometimes by definition), so they carry out and do things that undermine their goals in return for some quick but ephemeral reward.

test098

oh no, not the moderates who checks notes stand up for nothing and no one except themselves and overwhelmingly align with right wing politics. what's the moderate position on Trump/Musk, that we should accept a little bit of authoritarianism to make the government more efficient?

netsharc

I'm guessing people who haven't taken a stance don't feel the pain (yet). The old adage is "No country is more than three meals away from a revolution." 1), and some people still have meals. But alienating the "moderates" might lead them to join the "other side", because "our side" are just full of assholes...

1) Variations: https://quoteinvestigator.com/2022/05/02/nine-meals/

mc32

Except those are over 90% of the population. This move is not going to win moderates over at all. It’s a feel-good move like a nice heroine shot.

JKCalhoun

I feel like it actually worked for the AIDS issue.

amazingamazing

I’m sure this will go well and ensure the next election has a favorable outcome.

atomicnumber3

Because the last 3 have gone so well

SideLinesOfCode

How is this not political intimidation? It’s basically saying “someone go do something, here’s a list of people to harass”

AlecSchueler

Was it the same when Musk was sharing the details of judges' families on X?

e_i_pi_2

Does anyone know the URL for the actual site? Seems weird to write about a website and not link to it, and searching for it just brings up more articles that don't link to the site

GranPC

JKCalhoun

Yeah, bullshit site.

One Tesla in the Omaha area where I live. Clicking it gives a Virginia address.

I am aware of a handful of Tesla's within a few blocks of where I live. Not listed.

filoleg

Yeah, the whole area within miles of downtown LA had 3 Teslas, and the area around Redmond WA (where the Microsoft HQ is) had exactly one (and it wasn't even a Microsoft employee, apparently it was someone from Pure Storage). Which is obviously laughable, as my floor of the apartment parking garage alone (Seattle, 3 years ago) had 7 (out of maybe 18 total parking spots), and my floor at the work garage (in Redmond) had way more.

All in all, at this point, I am just curious how they obtained/gathered those specific datapoints. It isn't even a case of "some data is missing", it is more like "99%+ of data in the most Tesla-dominant areas in the US is missing".

null

[deleted]

null

[deleted]

traumatised

Doing all that because you disagree with someone in the government is kinda wild ngl, especially considering that Tesla used to be a leftist-leaning car due to EVs and etc

wormlord

I am not an expert sleuth, but using the WHOIS lookup tool it looks like the domain registrar is Japanese. Not to call everything and anything a "psyop" but if I were to set up something like this, I would do it for financial gain (shorting Tesla) rather than political gain, or to use it as a honeypot.

This kind of targeting of Tesla owners after the fact is essentially a dragnet that will affect people of all sorts of backgrounds, and is less effective than a direct boycott at achieving your political goals-- since you are going to polarize a huge chunk of people against you. I think many left-leaning protest organizers would understand this, but I may be mistaken since there are a lot of dumbasses in the world.

Again this is total speculation, but alarm bells immediately went off in my head.

atomicnumber3

Is it actually possible for things to get any more polarized at this point? You're either ok with this guy doing a Nazi salute in our seat of government, or you're not.

America needs to wake the fuck up and remind Nazis they are not welcome here and we already beat them once. Is this not a completely razor perfect targeted attack? No. But the guy you're supporting with these cars is fucking doxxing judges children to manipulate them. So I'm not going to fault this guy for fighting back.

zh1231278

Well, Ford and the Dulles brothers first supported Hitler against the communist threat. Up until Pearl Harbor WW2 was just a little continental war where it wasn't clear which side should be annihilated.

In the end they gave Poland, which was the initial casus belli and supposed to be protected by Britain, to Stalin (another lesson what being a proxy for maritime powers looks like).

Were any Ford cars vandalized during the time?

Jensson

> Up until Pearl Harbor WW2 was just a little continental war where it wasn't clear which side should be annihilated.

It wasn't in America but it was in the rest of the world, since European powers controlled such a large part of the world back then.

wormlord

Dude people bought the cars before Elon revealed himself to be a Nazi. Owning a Tesla does not make you an ideological fascist.

outer_web

Tip of my Sean John hat to you sir.

openmarmot

even the ADL stated it was obviously not a nazi salute. please pull back from the brink and stop advocating for political violence

wormlord

That means nothing, the ADL is willing to make an uneasy alliance with legitimate antisemites if it means furthering their settler colonialist project in the middle east.

atomicnumber3

he literally did it not once, but twice. i've been alive for thirty two years and done my fair share of autistic shit (programmer). But yknow what I've managed to never accidentally do? Anything even vaguely resembling a nazi salute. And yknow what? Fine, suppose for a moment it was an accident or whatever. If i were a billionaire figureheard of my company on national television in the seat of power of the free world, I would ensure I had media training and knew how to not have the international audience go "wow he just did a nazi salute, twice" if I didn't intend it. Remember George W stopping himself from saying the sound bite of "shame on me"? Elon is either literally, genuinely stupid, or he meant to do a nazi salute. And I honestly don't believe Elon is stupid from an intelligence perspective.

One last remark: if I did accidentally do a nazi salute on live television, do you know what I would do at the soonest available opportunity? Clarify that I'm not a nazi, it was an accident, and that nazis are bad. It's a surefire way to ensure you're not accidentally perceived as a nazi. Similar to how "Nazi Punks Fuck Off" really helped Dead kennedys in this regard.

gedy

This is certainly the way to win next elections..

If someone is really concerned about so-called fascism I don't think smashing VW Beetle windows in 1935 would've helped anything - in fact it would've just made things worse.

anigbrowl

VW Beetles were not produced until 1938, but I get your point.

What don't get is your idea that things would have been worse. Worse how? Within a few years the nazis were beheading people for distributing postcards critical of the regime. It's equally arguable that they might not have got as far as they did if people had been more willing to stand up to them in the first place.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_and_Elise_Hampel

gedy

My point was mainly that causing chaos for the regular citizen/voter tends to drive them into supporting the opposite party, especially if they are promising safety and stability.

Even the Nazis had to consider what their citizens were willing to put up with, so targeting everyday people with stunts like this would just undermine support for any viable opposition. "Worse" just meant having more unconditional support even earlier - that couldn't do a good thing.

Graffiting a Telsa may make the vandalizer feel good, but it doesn't win votes for the opposition.

anigbrowl

How often are totalitarian regimes defeated by voting, though? The problem with this mindset is that people can use it to talk themselves out of ever doing anything, which is the ideal environment for totalitarianism. Unpleasant as these tactics are, they seem to be effective in achieving their goal of cratering Tesla sales.

lvass

Now that you mention it, this type of escalation is exactly what the president would hope for if his goal is some form of the Enabling Act.

nebula8804

The only thing that matters is the economy. January 6 happened and the bozos still voted him back in office. If a crash happens or DOGE really f things up then they are done.

krapp

I don't believe the horrors of Nazi Germany would have been made worse if people smashed the windows of VW Beetles.

And besides, if someone turns to fascism just to piss off the anti-fascists who smashed their car windows, then it was never about the car windows, they're just looking for an excuse.

rafram

It seems unlikely that Democratic Party election strategists are behind this random BS site.

ivewonyoung

None of them will even lightly condemn even arson and property damage so its wink wink nudge nudge.

gedy

I agree, I'm commenting on the passionate types who (mis)direct their energies on stunts like this.

sorka

In the same boat. Bought '24 MSP last year which has been sitting in the garage for the last month. Love the car but wish I could justify driving it off a cliff at this point. I have 3 other cars, so it's not a big inconvenience but it is a gigantic paper weight. I knew I had to park it when I realized I had to check the live view on the cameras every 10 seconds. This level of extremism is exactly what the half that voted against trump did not want and now we have it on both sides.

null

[deleted]

jmuguy

Yeah this definitely doesn't help anything. I don't know why some people can't understand that everyone can get behind dunking on Elon Musk, because he is clearly an alien wearing a human suit. But doxxing Tesla owners is absolutely stupid.

kgwxd

It doesn't help anything, it hurts. It puts people in danger. It paints protestors as "terrorist". It gives Elon something to point at to claim himself the victim. Which is how we know actual Tesla protestors aren't behind it.

anothereng

well if you're not part of our team you're the enemy now. -them