Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

Mere weeks after Starship's breakup, the vehicle may soon fly again

blkhawk

What a difference a few weeks make. With Musks latest antics is super hard to still enjoy starship. He will/might do so much damage.

Like his comments about the ISS. He is a gigantic moron that got super lucky.

Animats

Gwynne Shotwell, not Musk, runs Space-X. She is very good at it. She really is a rocket scientist.

beAbU

I am worried that the good people at SpaceX might decide to abandon ship because of the Musk association. The money might be good, the work fantastic and exciting, but at some point saying "I work at SpaceX/Tesla/whatever" will become dangerous to one's health?

Musk put good people in charge of some of these companies, Gwynne Shotwell is a great example, but his sphere if influence is big enough that the collateral damage could be significant.

bluescrn

> I am worried that the good people at SpaceX might decide to abandon ship because of the Musk association. The money might be good, the work fantastic and exciting, but at some point saying "I work at SpaceX/Tesla/whatever" will become dangerous to one's health?

Meanwhile, plenty of people still work in industries such as oil+gas, tobacco, gambling, military tech, etc. No hate, no threats, business as usual.

JumpCrisscross

> I am worried that the good people at SpaceX might decide to abandon ship

For whom? There isn't another ship. (Literally. Ariane has nothing, ULA is on its deathbed, Blue Origin might do something in the 2030s and nobody is moving from Hawthorne to Xi'an.)

SpaceX remains a jewel of American industry and technological achievement. If you're an ambitious aerospace engineer, SpaceX is the only place where you'll see your cutting-edge work launched.

aredox

SpaceX has a clear mission; Tesla not so much. What is the use of building electric cars "to save the planet" while your boss is enabling a ton more environmental damage using the money from Tesla sales and charger network (and his giant compensation package)?

someothherguyy

If they do, what is the net harm? The technology that SpaceX was losing money to for decades is now known. Their moat isn't as deep or wide as it used to be. See Space Pioneer, CAS Space, Galactic Energy, LandSpace, ...

igleria

there are a lot of extremely intelligent people that would want to work for musk. why ? beats me, but reality is reality.

saturn8601

I think we need like a wiki for people to read all the stories that people have posted about working for Musk companies to understand why so many people stay. I have recently seen so much misinformation about Musk being pushed. Its completely fair to criticize a person that deserves intense criticism, it just does a disservice to other readers if the entire context is not explained because it then propagates false assumptions about Musk which he then uses to 'surprise' his critics because they were operating under incorrect beliefs.

At this point, no not going to happen. The money sucks given how much you work, no work/life balance. These people already sacrificed their personal lives to get the company to this point. No other company is getting to Mars first. If you are an Olympic class engineer, would you really just walk away from getting to be a part of history? I guess unless you are at the top of your field you are not going to feel the same as these guys.

Regarding engineers burning out, given that Tesla and SpaceX are some of the most desired companies for new Engineering grads Musk will have a continual supply of engineers to grind down to dust as the old ones become useless to him.

martindbp

No, we can hate Musk all we want, but we shouldn't rewrite history because we despise him. He is a complex individual, and he still deserves the credit for founding SpaceX and being chief engineer.

JumpCrisscross

> He is a complex individual, and he still deserves the credit for founding SpaceX and being chief engineer

Musk founded SpaceX. He hasn't been a chief engineer in anything but title for a long time. To the extent he deserves respect, it's in giving its team the insulation he's denied Twitter and the American people.

mihaaly

Aren't you attempting to disconnect something that is not disconnected?

zozbot234

Startship is a huge deal in the industry. It does everything that the Space Shuttles used to, and a lot more besides. The focus on it is entirely justified AFAICT.

nicce

It doesn’t justify bypassing safety regulation checks

flanked-evergl

Mind citing?

baq

Musk being… busy… with other things is net positive for spacex at this point.

He wasn’t always like this. If you ask me he’s got a substance abuse issue.

alkonaut

Is there no vetting of people who either hold office or senior government positions in the US now? One of the most basic things you do when doing a security clearance is checking that you don't have any bad things in your closet. Substance abuse, debt to shady people, gambling habit, mistresses, ... anything and everything that could be used to blackmail you would be a big fat no on your security clearance. Their 4chan accounts and every gaming chat since 1998 should be scanned for weird comments.

I get that it's hard to do for top elected officials - they are elected with flaws and all after all, and it's the job of the people to try to guess and judge whether someone, say, has had unknown extramarital affairs or holds bad debt, that could lead to them being compromised.

Not saying Musk would insta-fail his security clearance process but he sure wouldn't have a good time being questioned about what he said in a 4chan post or game chat in 2004, or being asked about every pill he took since 2000.

skissane

> One of the most basic things you do when doing a security clearance is checking that you don't have any bad things in your closet.

I knew a guy years ago who was going for a security clearance. And he was really worried about them asking about illegal drug use, and he told them the truth about his extensive past history of it. And then they told him they weren’t worried about it because the fact he’d been honest about it meant there was low risk of him being blackmailed over it, so they gave him his security clearance. (Not the US, Australia, maybe the rules are different here.)

blkhawk

The issue is that he is doing actual damage because it turns out that what was thought to be an aspirational goal (going to Mars) is the actually only goal. That means all the uses this new capability has become superfluous until that goal is achieved.

To me it became clear he is actually a moron and there is no deeper plan when the aspirational starship concept wasn't paired with him pointing out the other advantages it has.

For example:

* the estimated useable m³ capacity makes a special variant of a starship the equivalent to the ISS in capacity - now imagine docking 4 of those to a HUB. And that is without reusing the wet-workshop concept of space-lab.

* for the same reason nobody point out that it makes zero sense to use a starship as a landing system and not turn it into an instant moon base. The wet workshop concept applies here as well.

That is just two ways starship could be used as soon as it is orbit capable - Neither would need atmospheric re-entry

someothherguyy

One of the most consequential substance abuse issues of all time?

incognito124

He would never abuse substances! He loves the substances!

ReptileMan

Taking a break from the culture war does a lot of good. Some people on both sides have been whipping themselves into frenzy that the world is going to end for decade and a half now (almost two if we count the tea party) and it shows at the temps people going to therapy have been growing.

Take a break. Take a kitkat. It's going to fine. In four or eight years the other side will take power and you will have your revenge.

loktarogar

This one feels different. Musk and Trump are doing real damage to trust, US soft power and government institutions all of which have taken decades to build. They're trying to do things that could lead to pensioners having their income cut off, hundreds of thousands of people entering the job market suddenly, and whatever economic effects that brings. Then the actions actually leading to more deaths in Ukraine and emboldening Putin, and whatever that brings with it.

The main thing is that these are the kinds of actions that can't be reversed overnight if power flips. eg, You can't just rehire an entire department and have them operating effectively. We'll be feeling these things for years afterwards, possibly decades.

They're causing real damage, and it's intentional.

ReptileMan

If after betraying South Vietnam, the invasions of Iraq, Afghanistan there is any trust in US left, leaving Europe to help Ukraine instead of US would hardly diminish it either.

Philpax

Fine for you, perhaps, but not fine for everybody.

matwood

You seem to be speaking from a position of privilege though. A white, straight male who already has accumulated some assets will probably be fine. I'm not so sure about everyone else though.

I also think framing this as just a culture war is downplaying the dismantling of the US government and US influence around the world. Cozying up to Putin for example, will likely have geopolitical ramifications for decades.

null

[deleted]

TinkersW

The second you say something like that first sentence you have already lost the argument.

Which is annoying as the US is going to face some serious consequences from Trumps idiocy, phrasing it the way you did, is handing the future to Trump and his kind.

ReptileMan

> Cozying up to Putin for example, will likely have geopolitical ramifications for decades.

Yes. It will help reign in China.

cheema33

> Take a break. Take a kitkat. It's going to fine.

Tell that to people in Ukraine who were invaded by Russia. They were provided support by the US. Our leader and Musk are now blaming the victim and want them to surrender to the invader. Or pay $500B for US to give them additional support.

This is what we have come down to. People are dying and we are trying to shake them down like a mafia. Even mafia bosses are not that heartless.

Tell the Ukrainian kids hiding under desks from incoming missiles to take a break and take a kitkat.

ReptileMan

US have absolutely no obligations towards Ukraine. It may aid or deny aid based on US interests, but Ukraine's are irrelevant. UK has only obligation towards US kids.

And US have a long history of shaking down people dying in the trenches - like the Louisiana purchase and Alaska Purchase.

And Ukraine is Europe's not US problem anyway.

vednig

All these years and Starship seems like an inaccurate name for rockets, just because sci-fi movies gave us better things to dream of.