Release Notes for Ghostty 1.1.0
79 comments
·January 31, 2025jemmyw
jwr
> it's not as good as kitty
I can answer that from a very pragmatic point of view. I was able to download ghostty and get it to run the way I expected in about 5 minutes. Everything was smooth, intuitive, and the defaults were very good.
I tried many other terminal apps in the past and was always unimpressed, so I kept using Terminal.app. Ghostty is the first terminal emulator in years that worked better than Terminal.app.
jemmyw
I know that kitty has a one line install and has done for ages, and the defaults are fine? One thing I really liked about the default config was that it lists every option with an explanation.
jwr
Since you insist, I actually downloaded kitty again and tried it. And I confirmed that I disagree with "it's not as good as kitty".
Within minutes I ran into a problem: tried to select a theme using 'kitten themes', could navigate themes but enter did not work, nor was I able to Ctrl-C. I had to kill the app from a different terminal (ahem).
That's what I remember from trying other terminals: they usually try to do too much, and there are plenty of rough edges, which results in me having to spend too much time fussing around. Ghostty gets this right: things work well, the defaults are good, and things that you want to change are easy to change.
Kudos
Similar to this, but I actually needed to compile it. Still only took 5 minutes to be up and running even though I've never gone near that toolchain before.
throwaway678339
And yet somehow ghostty still doesn't support cmd-f text search. Such a basic and important feature, and I don't get why they can't add it.
ku1ik
Of course they can. They just haven’t, yet, due to different priorities. Also, I barely use search in my terminals, and I believe there’s more of us for who lack of this feature is not a deal breaker.
flohofwoe
Kitty on Mac has a few visual issues that Ghostty doesn't have:
- the text rendering looks slightly blurry when comparing side by side (Kitty looks blurry, Wezterm and Ghostty look crisp)
- when resizing the window, the window content 'wobbles' (Ghostty is stable, both Kitty and Wezterm have the resize wobble)
This wobbling effect is a known issue with Metal views (no idea tbh why Apple can't fix that in the window system), the solution is to 'anchor' the view to one window side during resizing (although not perfect, since during the maximize transition the window content doesn't scale), but the basic wobbling fix is fairly simple: https://github.com/floooh/sokol/pull/963
In general I have the impression that Kitty feels quite 'heavy' on macOS compared to both Wezterm and Ghostty (and iTerm2 which I used before feels heavier than all those combined).
jemmyw
This is true now I come to compare them. The font rendering in ghostty is crisper. I don't really care about the resize issue, but I could see it.
Kitty has always felt super light to me compared to Mac alternatives.
itsn0tm3
I think Ghostty outperforms Kitty in font rendering, especially on high-resolution, high-DPX displays like MacBooks. It also offers integrated session management—both features I personally value highly. That said, Kitty is still an excellent terminal.
tambourine_man
I couldn’t find anything related to session management in the documentation and it’s something I miss. Do you have a link? Thanks
maleldil
Maybe they're referring to saving the state of the windows when you quit the program?
laserbeam
It's new. It's led by a star dev. It has sane defaults. It's written in a new programming language, so devs can learn from it if they're interested in the language (there are only a handful production ready projects written in zig so far).
I'm also sticking to kitty, 'cause I use some of the more funky features. But if I were to recommend a terminal to a newbie, I would recommend ghostty as it really cares about having a good default experience.
gorjusborg
Pretty much exactly what I was going to say, except I have long ago dropped kitty (went back to alacritty).
I have found composing simple tools into a toolset is way better in the long term than shopping for the 'one tool to rule them all'.
Mitchell has always seemed like a principled, rooted developer who produces quality product. He also does his homework (he made me aware of wezterm due to it being prior art he referenced).
Finally, I am one who is interested in Zig, graphics, and a terminal junkie. When I found out Mitchell wrote a tty, I had to try it, and was not disappointed.
ulbu
yes, it's really plug-and-play. and the standard to which every feature was held from the start inspires confidence in its future; as opposed to alacritty with its "just use another terminal then, we're not considering this", and wezterm, whose kitty keyboard protocol implementation had more bugs than not (can't hold it against them - the protocol is nice but the document called its "spec" is just ghastly). They're still great, of course.
and Mitchell is pleasant and very approachable, as opposed to Kovid.
I've been using it for almost a year now and I just never noticed it at all, it's been seamless. A great example of Zuhandenheit.
paraboul
Agreed. Ghostty has become my goto Zig reference.
lucsky
> Kitty is cross platform
In the absolute lowest sense possible, which means that it's been compiled for different platforms and it runs on different platforms, but it also looks and feels completely alien on anything else than a Linux machine with a tiling window manager.
beardicus
looks and runs like a mac app on macOS as far as i can tell. seems pretty normal on XFCE as well. not sure what you're finding to be "completely alien".
Munksgaard
I'm still not sure why I should switch away from alacritty...
PennRobotics
saner defaults, easier configurability (esp. mouse/keyboard, where the documentation can be less-than-clear; and imported config files, where the path doesn't always resolve cleanly), user-friendly documentation available in multiple forms (Alacritty has declared they will never do this: manpage and website only!), lack of dismissive attitude from devs (in addition to manpage stubbornness? no to "smart copy", no "example config", no "reset and clear scrollback" which was a 6-line ready-to-go PR, no "confirm quit" when tasks are active or even when the user prefers it), better integrated with GTK libraries and GNOME extensions (no strange Alt+Tab popup behavior, unresolved IBus weirdness), good proof of concept for an alternative new-ish programming language, Alacritty is generally not faster or leaner or bug-free compared to some other terminals: every now and then I would open top and alacritty would be at 8 or 9 percent while just being open in the background (and with reasonably high physical memory usage; just because my machine has the RAM doesn't mean I want the OS to allocate it to over-hungry Rust utilities)
I can think of a dozen excellent reasons to stop using Alacritty (and not in favor of Kitty) and I did because of some of them.
maccard
I don't want to learn tmux to handle a feature that my OS already handles. If alacritty supported tabs (and was slightly less hostile, e.g. [0]) I'd be happy with it
nitinreddy88
Pretty much same. I didn't find anything its doing substantial from kitty and copied almost all good things from kitty
saturn_vk
Kitty honestly looks pretty bad, at least on gnome. I’ve tried tweaking its settings, but I could never get it to look even remotely as good as ghostty out of the box. And the latter looks like a proper gnome app
knuckleheads
Ghostty is great and a lot of fun, only thing missing to me is search scrollback. https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/issues/189 They know about this and I think the current answer from them is just use tmux or the like. Only thing missing though, otherwise a fun pleasant experience.
scosman
Agreed. I’ve got it installed and the second it has this it’s my new default. Great app, hopefully this comes soon.
tambourine_man
Yes, also no Command-. to send CTRL-C is a glaring omission for an app intended to be native on the Mac. They got Command-K right, though.
But it’s an interesting project, I’m playing with it regularly.
wpm
For me, native Mac apps should be using CFPreferences to store config.
sisk
This is possible with this newly released version. Just add this to your config.
keybind = "cmd+.=text:\x03"tambourine_man
Thanks!
sethammons
This is the only thing missing for me and my teams. You run a test suite and it failed. Cmd+f should allow me to search for error or failure messages.
verghese
Switched over from Iterm - A fundamental feature I'm missing is the search feature (Cmd + F).
vicek22
I use the scrollback buffer export to a temporary file (CMD+SHIFT+J), you can then open the file in any editor.
So my workflow is to type in `vim` and then press `CMD+SHIFT+J` and Enter
scosman
Anyone figure out how to bind this to CMD-F with key bindings?
maleldil
Here are a few ways to add key bindings to do this in a single action, but it's macOS-only and a little clunky. I prefer the one a little further down where you use a second keybind to open the editor.
[1] https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/discussions/3708#disc...
CSDude
This has been the major frustration for me as well. That's the only thing missing for me.
postepowanieadm
Shouldn't it be handled by your shell? I know it's a question without the correct answer - I'm struggling with deciding what should be handled by wm, terminal, terminal multiplexer, shell, text editor.
pilif
The shell doesn't have access to the scrollback though. A multiplexer would, if you used one.
milgrim
I really enjoy using it so far.
I know it's subjective, but it feels fast and lean, while iTerm felt cluttered. I really like WezTerm also, but not having a quake style terminal meant that I used iTerm in parallel. So being able to use only Ghostty now is super nice. I just hope that support for tabs in the quick terminal (that's the quake style terminal in Ghostty) is coming at some point.
It'a also great to see how quickly Mitchell reacts to issues on GitHub. It was nice to report an issue and see it fixed only a few hours after that.
ramon156
I never understood the argument "its fast" All of them are fast? I mean, iTerm had a period in my life where it felt clunky, but I've never had a "slow" terminal. Alscritty, kitty, etc. are all pretty fast themselves
scosman
You don’t notice the delay of a slow terminal until you use a fast one. After that it’s hard to go back. Typing and tab switching are noticeably faster.
But I alscritty/kitty are fast too. It’s more a comparison to terminal.app/iterm and others.
chearon
It matters a lot more if you use vim at a huge resolution, or anything that sends a lot of control sequences. Terminal.app and iTerm get sluggish.
rjh29
Its selling feature is it looks 'native' for Mac and is GPU-rendered. I don't find that important personally, it's just a box with text in it...
nrvn
Yeah. “Fast” in what sense? I tried printing all unicode characters in 80 symbol lines and scrolling the screen of several thousand lines does not freeze only in terminal.app.
Aside from some bizarre tests and benchmarks like this in normal life I don’t know what could be considered slow.
ksynwa
> Ghostty 1.1 on Linux now supports server-side decorations (SSD) for compositors that support it.
God bless
> For X11, we could not find a well-supported protocol for SSD, so we continue to use CSD.
Noo
mi_lk
Any plan to implement Copy Mode similar to WezTerm?
linsomniac
Copy Mode and Quick Select are two things in Wezterm that I use all. the. time. The other killer feature is the remote multiplexing, because it gives a better experience than ssh+tmux. https://wezfurlong.org/wezterm/multiplexing.html
barnabee
Yep, I don't think I could go back to a terminal without an equivalent of Copy Mode and Quick Select. If it had those, Ghostty would be interesting so sure.
Winsaucerer
I like how scriptable it is.
stared
I use the default macOS Terminal with the fish shell and starship prompt, and I'm quite happy with it.
I see people raving about Ghostty, though I'm not sure what I'm missing. What features do you find most compelling about it?
robinsonrc
The main reason to I switched from macOS Terminal is it lacks true colour support (Ghostty far from the only alternative that offers this, but it's quite similar to Terminal.app in the way that it feels, it's a decent native macOS experience)
jasonjayr
> SSD is only supported on Wayland. Ghostty uses the KDE Server Decoration protocol. Despite the name, this protocol is supported on almost every major Wayland compositor, not just KDE. For X11, we could not find a well-supported protocol for SSD, so we continue to use CSD.
I thought X11 was SSD by default, delegating windows decorations to the window manager?
hnlmorg
It is. That’s one my the many things I like about X (it has its warts too. So many warts)
d3Xt3r
Looks like they still haven't fixed the bug where fastfetch is glitchy if you have it in your startup profile... :(
yonatan8070
> Keybinds support a new performable: prefix. This prefix indicates that the keybind should only consume the input if the action is performed.
That's a pretty cool feature, I think the Windows Terminal does something similar to that for Ctrl+c, but I don't know if it's configurable.
hnlmorg
It’s relatively common. tmux supports it as does my own hobby terminal emulator too. Pretty sure I’ve seen it on other terminal utils as well.
justmarc
Liking it a lot so far. Keep it up!
I'm a little puzzled why Ghostty is so suddenly popular. I've tried it, it's OK but it's not as good as kitty, and it's implementing the protocols that kitty invented to make the terminal experience better. Kitty is cross platform, fast, visually pared back, and really featured. I keep finding new things like it's got a protocol for copying files over ssh sessions, and the hints system is really neat.