HMD Key Announced for £59 in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand
hmd.com
AI founders will learn The Bitter Lesson
lukaspetersson.com
The Illustrated Guide to a PhD
matt.might.net
Kenney.nl: Free Game Assets
kenney.nl
Phi 4 available on Ollama
ollama.com
Harper (YC W25) Is Hiring #1 Founding Growth/Operations Lead
ycombinator.com
Darkest and clearest skies at risk from industrial megaproject
eso.org
How hucksters are manipulating Google to promote shady Chrome extensions
arstechnica.com
De-smarting the Marshall Uxbridge
tomscii.sig7.se
Mullenweg Shuts Down WordPress Sustainability Team, Igniting Backlash
therepository.email
IP addresses through 2024
potaroo.net
Cannonball: An enhanced OutRun engine
github.com
Track your devices via Apple FindMy network in Go/TinyGo
github.com
How outdated information hides in LLM token generation probabilities
blog.anj.ai
Show HN: TypeScript/React/Vue Window Layout Manager (Tabs, Floating, Popouts)
github.com
AI in the 80s? How a Simple Animal Guessing Game Pioneered Machine Learning
medium.com
Map of California roads for cyclers (1895)
loc.gov
Ingrid Daubechies awarded National Medal of Science
today.duke.edu
The Tsunami of Burnout Few See
charleshughsmith.blogspot.com
Show HN: Ultra-portable Gantt chart tool for very regulated environments
github.com
These rogue extensions are "surreptitiously monetizing web searches" - but doesn't Google conspicuously monetize web searches?
So it seems the Google TOS bans competition in search monetization using their "open source" browser. Isn't it odd that an "open source" browser is apparently designed to provide a monopoly on search monetization by the nice people who give it to you for free?
And being 80% or so of all searches: https://www.statista.com/statistics/216573/worldwide-market-...
It seems like Peter Thiel's claim that google is a search advertising monopoly masquerading as a (competitive, non-monopoly) technology company might be spot on.