TP-Link conducts Wi-Fi 8 trials, promises better reliability and lower latency
49 comments
·October 18, 2025ChocolateGod
lazycatjumping
> I bet companies will release WiFi 8 products even when it's still a draft, just as they did with WiFI 7.
They must. Otherwise it cannot be tested within the labs.
And producing chips before a standard is finalized is usually no problem at all: there are gates within the standardization process where the will be no more changes that are relevant for the silicon.
These 802.11n-draft APs were a singular fuckup regarding this.
mikepurvis
Similar transition for me. Basic dual AP setup that I took from first gen UAPs (wifi 4) to U7 Pro. I think I have only one client (a Lenovo laptop) that connects with wifi 7, but even the wifi 6 devices are screamers now; my phone can get 600mbps symmetric with line of sight or 200-300mbps from two floors away. Just bonkers.
halapro
I don't need lower latency, I need better congestion management. WiFi in busy areas (like airports) sucks.
throw0101a
> WiFi in busy areas (like airports) sucks.
This is part of what opening up the 6 GHz was about.
But there are also provisions in newer standards like Target Wake Time: the client can be told to sleep for a while, not using radio spectrum (and also saving battery).
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11ah#Target_Wake_Time
OFDMA allows multiple clients to use the same frequency at the same time (using sub-channels):
* https://airheads.hpe.com/blogs/antar1/2020/10/19/why-is-ofdm...
piva00
I haven't encountered issues with airports' WiFi in many years, at least not the ones I fly from in Europe.
What airports have you seen issues lately? It's one thing I haven't thought about in a long time.
IlikeKitties
I recently torrented a movie on a airport wifi while waiting for a plane and it worked so well, even when walking around the airport to the plane. I was impressed.
2III7
Use a remote server for such vile behavior.
Neywiny
I have a computer with a 1G Ethernet phy designed before everything was ratified. Not great. I'll make sure to wait
hulitu
>I bet companies will release WiFi 8 products even when it's still a draft, just as they did with WiFI 7.
No need to be left behind. They can already release WiFi 9 products. /s
lazycatjumping
Wifi-8 will be great. Finally we get seamless controlled handovers between accesspoints that can be controlled from infrastucture side.
With MAP 2.4GHz can serve as long range network that can be filled with High-Rate 5GHz / 6GHz cells. And all of them can be utilized in parallel.
802.11be (Wifi-7) still lacks this.
uyzstvqs
You can already make a MAP network, and any modern client will automatically hop between APs pretty fast, based on which one has the strongest signal. There's a common misconception that devices will cling to one AP while better ones are available, which hasn't been true in many years now from my experience.
Infrastructure side handovers are great for load balancing though, for enterprise networks with very high client density.
lazycatjumping
> based on which one has the strongest signal.
That's not what you want to have in an enterprise environment.
A roaming decision must be based on the signal level readings from both sides from the infrastructure side.
Everything else is gambling.
hanikesn
In my experience Apple clients have been incredibly clingy to 6ghz bands, while much better 5ghz was available.
throw0101a
Perhaps worth noting that 802.11bn is dubbed "Ultra High Reliability (UHR)":
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11bn
So they're explicitly look at more than just adding more bits per second.
skavi
I wonder how consumer Wi-Fi 8 products will be marketed.
“Now More Reliable!” in a spiky red circle alongside the unchanged highly theoretical bandwidth numbers?
tymonPartyLate
If you want reliable Wifi at home, get yourself Ubiquity access points and throw away TP-Link. The issue is not the protocol. After many years of unplugging and plugging back in my TP-link router I know that they are cursed.
jonathanlydall
I think it's more a case of don't use cheap consumer grade hardware in any kind of remotely demanding scenario.
I have "enterprise" TP-Link equipment for my house which I bought 3 years ago now and am very happy with it, in particular I'm using:
- 4x EAP245 Access Points
- 1x SG3428 Switch (the APs came with PoE injectors and I wanted a fan-less switch, hence why the switch is not PoE enabled)
I rent out a room on my property and have my tenant on a separate VLAN to the main house. I also have my IoT devices on a separate VLAN.
I use a generic PC with pfSense as my "router".
My only complaint is that their Omada Controller software doesn't want to run as a Windows Service (I'm not interested in trying to manage a Linux box). Fortunately, it's not required at all, but is useful for centralized configuration management and facilitation of handover of WiFi clients between APs.
Before I moved into my current large-ish place, I used "cheap" ISP supplied TP-Link routers with WiFi, and aside from limited speed capabilities, were 100% reliable for me, in particular I used the following two models:
- TL-WR840N
- Archer C20.
I also use a few cheap (but again fully reliable) 5 port and 8 port TP-Link 1GB/s switches, for example under my desk in my office to allow both my laptop and desktop to share the single CAT6 cable to the room.
Before buying the "enterprise" TP-Link equipment I considered Ubiquiti, but the TP-Link stuff was less expensive, I liked the controller being optional and considering all my past TP-Link equipment's reliability was a non-issue, I was happy "to take a risk".
PeterStuer
I use TP-link switches exclusively as they turned out far more reliable than any other I had.
For wifi I have been using ASUS's AI Mesh. Not that impressed tbh so looking to change to something else in the next upgrade cycle.
nottorp
Can relate. I went through various consumer ish access points until I got tired of it and splurged on an Ubiquiti.
Haven't had any wifi problems since. To the point I don't remember what wifi standard my home is on :)
Too bad they may or may not have given up on the cloud connectivity requirement. I've been told (even on here) they have, but I've also been told that you can disable it after setup instead of setting up without any stinking cloud.
Say, did Ubiquity stuff work during the AWS outage?
zuhsetaqi
As far as I know devices like Access Points only need the Controller to be configured or monitored. Once they are configured they work completely without it.
nottorp
What does that mean, that the controller won't work without a cloud account? :)
It doesn't really matter which part in the chain requires the stinking cloud as long as they sneak it in somewhere.
Speaking of which, I just bought a Razer mouse again because I've read they gave up on the login requirement for configuring your blinkenlights. But they didn't. They invented a 'guest login' instead.
Burned twice so far.
XorNot
My Ubiquity stuff worked fine the whole time, but I do have the Dream Machine as my router/video surveillance hub.
None of my ubiquity stuff uses their cloud stuff at all.
viraptor
It's tough. On one hand side, TP-Link has some weird issues. On the other, I spent a while debugging an issue with their engineers and they seem to actually care to improve things. Maybe the lower price is worth it sometimes.
null
casept
I've always had good experiences with TP-Link, just not their stock firmware. They're cheap and reliable OpenWRT devices.
jansper39
Better yet, buy actual enterprise gear even if it's a generation behind. You can find decent Aruba, Ruckus and Cisco kit on eBay going for decent prices.
flanked-evergl
I bought a UniFi Dream Router 7 some months ago, very happy with it so far.
randomtoast
I don't even have Wi-Fi 7 yet.
navigate8310
Don't worry, by the time we get cheap mass produced Wi-Fi 7 4x4 MIMO routers, we'll have Wi-Fi 9 ready to be drafted.
calcifer
> Wi-Fi 7 4x4 MIMO routers
Are there any such routers? And even if there are, are there any clients? The last 4x4 MIMO Wi-Fi client I can remember was the Asus PCE-AC88, a Wi-Fi 5 NIC from 2016.
skavi
> Not expected to arrive until 2028
uyzstvqs
I'm still waiting for 6 GHz APs to be the same price as 5 GHz. Can't find a basic AP under €100 yet.
> While some draft specifications could be released in 2027, the official Wi-Fi 8 standard is projected to be finalized only in mid-2028. Commercial products that officially support the new standard are not expected to reach the market until late 2028 at the earliest.
I bet companies will release WiFi 8 products even when it's still a draft, just as they did with WiFI 7.
I upgraded my home setup to WiFi 7 a few weeks ago, and after being a WiFi hater for so long, was actually surprised at how much better it was over my previous experiences with WiFi. With MLO clients get 2-3ms latency with 2.5Gbit links, I'm all for WiFi 8 trying to reduce the latency further, I don't need more speed.