Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

Like humans, every tree has its own microbiome, a new study has found

dunefox

Entangled life by Merlin Sheldrake shows how, amongst many other amazing facts, tightly integrated mushrooms and trees are. Everything about this is amazing to me.

bookofjoe

Richard Powers' novel "The Overstory" takes this premise and wraps a wonderfully entertaining and fact-suffused novel around it. Highly recommended.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Overstory

null

[deleted]

accrual

The sheer volume of life here is incredible. I already know trees to be stewards of life on earth but wasn't aware they had complex inner ecosystems themselves.

goku12

Multicellular life seems to have appeared independently from unicellular life several times in the past, including 6 instances of complex multicellular life from eukaryotic cells, that led to animals and land plants. It may also have happened repeatedly, with some disappearing altogether in course of time. Another important aspect of life is the extreme prevalance of symbiosis, even among unicellular life. It's even theorized that the genesis of the entire Eukaryota domain and many of its organnelles (notably mitochondria and chloroplasts) are the results of repeated cellular endosymbiosis where a unicellular organism consumed a prokaryote that eventually becomes a useful part of the host cell instead of its food.

Considering the two facts above and how often multicellular organisms and unicellular organisms interact, it's highly improbable that any multicellular organism would have evolved without developing a life sustaining dependence on a huge array of unicellular organisms. I would be very surprised if that happened.

I'm not dismissing your remark. Any day where you don't learn at least one new thing is a day wasted. But given the mathematical odds, what you said seems inevitable to me rather than a surprise.

moi2388

Do you have a source for this? I was under the impression that the scientific consensus today was that multicellular life only appeared once.

andsoitis

> multicellular life only appeared once

Simple Multicellularity is estimated to have evolved at least 20 and probably more than 50 times for independent events of simple multicellularity.

Complex multicellurarity at least six times (animals, plants, fungi, brown and red algae).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicellular_organism

griffzhowl

You might be thinking of the genesis of eukaryotes, which is thought to be from a specific event where one archaeon incorporated a bacterium, and all eukaryotic organisms are descended from the resulting symbiotic arrangement, with our nuclear DNA descending from the archaeon, and our mitochondria descending from the bacterium.

All multicellular life is eukaryotic, but not all eukaryotes are multicellular, e.g. amoebae.

goku12

> I was under the impression that the scientific consensus today was that multicellular life only appeared once.

If that's the case, then the relevant Wikipedia article [1] will need a major correction. They reference multiple sources which are more likely to interest you.

Multiple independent emergence of multicellular life didn't really surprise me, considering how often unicellular life mutates. I'm actually surprised by the suggestion that the opposite is the current scientific consensus. Do you have any sources for that? (Not a challenge. Just want to understand the situation and misconceptions if any.)

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicellular_organism#Occurre...

vasco

Supposedly they also emit ultrasonic sounds when lacking water, or getting leaves cut (ie reacting to stress), and some animals can hear them, and some trees release pheromones to warn others about predation and downwind plants can pick this up and make themselves more bitter by ramping up tannin production. Plants are more interesting than they seem.

metalman

Trees(softwoods) have greater genetic variability between indivuals of the same species than humans, which made prosecuting "log jacking" much easier, as a simple chip could be taken from each log at a mill or on a truck and matched to stumps of trees taken illegaly. The great variability amongst indivuals makes genetic matching, fast and cheap.

This is relevant to the discussion as it poses the idea that greater variability in the biomes of indivual trees could be partly liked to greater genetic variability of the trees themselves. If so, the value of intact large forests is then increased, and may point to non linear decreases in other forsest species.

Razengan

Domain of Science just put out a great new "Map of" video that shows how fungi are up in everything:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FqFg-rjzPo

ants_everywhere

Serious question: how could it not?

Surely the contribution is cataloging and detailing information about tree microbiomes and not proving that they aren't all identical?

melagonster

Because on a larger scale, trees of the same species will have very specific microbiomes. In the past, most of the studies focused on ecology scales.

ants_everywhere

I'm sorry, but I don't quite understand. When you say "very specific microbiomes" do you mean similar microbiomes? I.e. on a larger scale there is much more across-specifies microbiome variability than within-species microbiome variability? Or have I misunderstood?

MangoToupe

As always, clicking past the newspaper headline and through to the research shows that it is the newsroom that introduces this confusion. Here’s the abstract, showing that the microbiome is indeed assumed and the paper is offering an initial exploration as to what precisely this microbiome consists of:

> Despite significant advances in microbiome research across various environments, the microbiome of Earth’s largest biomass reservoir—the wood of living trees—remains largely unexplored. Here, we illuminate the microbiome inhabiting and adapted to wood and further specialized to individual host tree species, revealing that wood is a harbour of biodiversity and potential key players in tree health and forest ecosystem functions. We demonstrate that a single tree hosts approximately one trillion bacteria in its woody tissues, with microbial communities distinctly partitioned between heartwood and sapwood, each maintaining unique microbiomes with minimal similarity to other plant tissues or ecosystem components. The heartwood microbiome emerges as a particularly unique ecological niche, distinguished by specialized archaea and anaerobic bacteria driving consequential biogeochemical processes. Our findings support the concept of plants as ‘holobionts’—integrated ecological units of host and associated microorganisms—with implications for tree health, disease and functionality. By characterizing the composition, structure and functions of tree internal microbiomes, our work opens up pathways for understanding tree physiology and forest ecology and establishes a new frontier in environmental microbiology.

kinj28

Can we get lab made wood then ?

kinj28

ChatGPT tells me inventwood and zinnia from MIT are already at some stage in the lifecycle.

This surely seems like a game changer and won’t need much of deforestation at some point.

indigodiddy

[flagged]

zkmon

[flagged]

jc_811

I think you underestimate what does (or could possibly) have consequences for life on earth

zkmon

I think you overestimate your understanding of life. No, nothing outside of our galaxy is going to have an impact on life on Earth. If you think otherwise, please provide examples.