Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

The US military’s on-base slot machines

westpfelia

They can make all the arguments they want about what "good" this money does. But all I see is its taking people who might be interested in leaving the military after 4 years, and sucking them back in due to debt, or not earning as much money as they thought they could.

Its a underhanded forced recruitment tool.

the_snooze

It really shows how rotten and cynical the "leadership" has become.

To take a cue from Band of Brothers, "never put yourself in a situation where you can take from these men." https://youtu.be/AyLHIobW0HQ

reactordev

The two class system of the military broke that rule during Vietnam…

Morals only apply to enlisted men. And only then if commanded to have them. Officers are given way more leeway and afforded more luxury.

dlachausse

I really don’t believe that’s the motivation here. Bad credit is one of the most common causes of losing your security clearance and failing to pay your debts can result in disciplinary actions. The military has no issues throwing money at retention when they need to.

I do honestly believe it is just a misguided attempt to fund Morale, Welfare, and Recreation.

westpfelia

Well in the case of the person in the article by "funding morale, welfare, and recreation" the military lost an officer. Not something cheap considering the wild amount of money that gets pumped in to training. He lost his family/friends, nearly his life, and financially ruined. But hey at least the VA was able to find a old dusty pamphlet a few years later.

le-mark

> the military lost an officer. Not something cheap considering the wild amount of money that gets pumped in to training.

This is uninformed. The US military is in the business of weeding out officers (and enlisted) via up or out policies. If you don’t get promoted within a certain number of years you’re out.

icegreentea2

The article mentions two reasonable reasons for allowing the program (which is about gambling on bases outside of US) to continue.

1. The classic, "people will want to gamble, we may as well control the supply". I think this is generally true. In the US, service members can go off base (when allowed) to gamble in a more or less controlled manner. This program provides the possibility of more or less uniform, controlled access across the globe, regardless of host nation.

2. Revenue funds morale, welfare and recreation activities.

I honestly think point 1 is fair enough. The corrosive element is that it's used for aspect 2 (an alternate approach might be to simply to redistribute money back to the soldiers directly... or just let it go to waste). The challenge is that once someone's funding is coupled to gambling revenue, it compromises its ability to pursue task 1 (which is basically a risk mitigation strategy).

JKCalhoun

> 1. The classic, "people will want to gamble, we may as well control the supply".

Of course, anecdote, but the example they give — sounds like the guy never would have thought to gamble had there not been a slot machine on base. At the same time, he was so easily and thoroughly adsorbed into it, perhaps he was dry kindling — just waiting for any spark to come along.

icegreentea2

Yes agreed. The challenge with any risk mitigation (harm reduction) strategy like this is that it is super super implementation specific. I'd agree based on the description given in the article that the program as currently run is probably not being particularly successful at risk mitigation.

That being said, without real numbers, it's super slippery to argue anything. One could argue that the on base gambling problem introduces (say) 3x the population into gambling. But then perhaps it decreases the of severe financial distress by 10x on an individual basis. That would be a net win. Then one might say that it lowers to risk of off-base unsavory behavior (getting into fights, owing money to local gangs/organized crimes, etc etc) by 1000x on an individualized basis. Perhaps that further tilts the field.

BobbyTables2

Ironically the reasoning in #1 also applies well to legalizing things in various communities. (Without a legal source, some people will see out illegal businesses, drive crime, etc.). I don’t see “go to the neighboring state” as a solution if they all ban X…

I really don’t know what the solution is. Used to think I was in favor of legalization of some drugs, not because I’m interested in their use but as a tool to take power away from gangs and reduce crime.

Later visited a state that did… Actually seeing marijuana stores everywhere was very unsettling. Weird seeing fast food stores converted to them. Saw some high hippies crash their vehicle into their friend’s car door while it was opening. Barely even registered for them… Left a bad taste in my mouth…

Bu it does seem reasonable that the fewer service members interacting with dishonest/criminal organizations, the better.

nsonha

I wonder how this argument is not applied to prostitution, drugs and other illegal things.

mytailorisrich

All militaries have always turned a blind eye on those things (if not being completely OK with it, e.g. prostitution) as long as soldiers are in fighting condition when needed and that they don't cause too much trouble with local civilians.

mathgeek

There’s a key difference between ignoring a behavior and profiting from it.

bko

I can't understand why the government has to be so involved in gambling. I'm pretty much okay with the lottery, it's kind of silly thing you can play with friends or coworkers, you pretty much know you're not going to win. But scratch off tickets are worse because it's kind of unlimited. Most people wouldn't blow $100 on lottery tickets, but might on scratch off. There's no delay, just buy immediately to lose. And then they have the apps. Why? Are they really necessary? And to top it off, there's advertisements. It's one thing to say people want to gamble and this is a way to take a reasonable profit and use it to pay for public services. It's quite another to actually try to encourage people to play.

Do we really have to optimize everything?

trothamel

I wonder if at least part of this is to ensure that the gambling is run by the military, rather than the service members going off base to gamble at places that could be connected to organized crime. Does anyone know if in the countries where this is happening off-based gambling has such connections?

JKCalhoun

Or online sports gambling?

dec0dedab0de

Only way this can be moral is if it were zero profit.

That is, if the machines pay true odds, and the military eats the cost of the machines.

x187463

Gambling and other predatory businesses on military bases are gross. MLM's run rampant through military communities by preying on dependents and the tighter social networks formed by military families. Yeah, I know, freedom to make adult decisions and all, but sometimes it's nice to just keep the garbage out in the first place.

Cthulhu_

> freedom to make adult decisions and all

Not to sound like an authoritarian, but sometimes I don't think freedom and free will is to be trusted to people. Not when they can be exploited. Some people are prone to addictions (like gambling); should they, especially when they represent a country, be allowed to indulge? Or should they follow a program to help them with their issues? Is the addiction the real problem or just a symptom of something deeper?

I wonder if there's programs (in e.g. the military) that deal with this. I also wonder if they're trying stuff like ozempic and the like, which apparently helps with a wider range of impulsive / addictive behaviours.

michaelt

> sometimes I don't think freedom and free will is to be trusted to people. Not when they can be exploited.

The thing is, you gotta square that with these guys getting sent into war zones to get shot at.

If we think these young men and women can’t consent to gambling their money, but can consent to gambling their lives, that seems a bit inconsistent to me.

simplicio

The $ argument in favor of this seems a little silly. The $ brought in a millionth of the US military budget.

Think the best argument presented in the piece is just that some non-trivial fraction of soldiers are going to gamble, and its better they do so in a manor controlled by the military then backroom poker games, online, etc.

petcat

State lotteries and scratch tickets should be illegal and banned. Every time I go to the deli I'm inevitably waiting behind a (very obviously) poor person blowing their paycheck or welfare check on a dozen lotto and scratch tickets.

Cthulhu_

It's better they're legal and regulated than illegal and unregulated - and there's plenty of illegal / unregulated gambling out there.

petcat

I just feel like it's a big difference in scale between dealing with a local illegal bookie in your neighborhood and a massive state-sponsored gambling enterprise operating "bookies" out of every corner store and gas station in the country.

Simulacra

I disagree with this. High stress environment, already with an alcohol and spending problem (super high interest car loans etc) that in this case: the machines need to go.

But that also challenges a broader trend in games of chance proliferating. In some places, small businesses are pushing hard to allow them to put them in their businesses because they make money.

Gambling is one of those places where I draw the line about freedom of choice and disposition. It's too easy to lose everything, and get suckered in to lose more. It needs stronger regulation because the House never loses, and people who can't control themselves suffer.

hdgvhicv

You draw the line there. Others draw it at alcohol. Others at pornography.

That’s fine. There should be limits on freedom.

JKCalhoun

I suppose you're being ironic, but I think most scholars have (unironically) said as much. Obv. example, yelling "Fire" in a crowded movie house.

In most of the cases you mentioned we all wish that people were better people — showed some self-control. (Might as well add fire-arms to your list as well.) And hoping that all people can behave with all out interests in mind, we give people those freedoms (as we do) and then the rest of us are left to endlessly grouse about how fucked up our society is because of those people and their poor choices.

So how do you win?

Some people have concluded that we might, as a society, actually be better off without "Thing X" as one of our freedoms. I'm willing to entertain those arguments.

__s

& it's fair to regulate these. Nobody cares about regulating free slots with no reward, or Balatro

I don't want PornHub ads on billboards & commercials

I was at a bar, coming out of the bathroom I walked into a wall. They stopped serving me alcohol. I went to the liquor store after & they refused to sell me a bottle of jaeger since I wasn't walking straight. The casino won't stop serving you games until you're broke or winning

lupusreal

The individual liberty argument for gambling being legal might have some merit, maybe. Personally I don't buy it, but I don't think people who disagree with me are necessarily unreasonable.

What's completely beyond the pale for me is the government actually promoting it. Unconscionable evil.

grues-dinner

Gambling is an evil business and everyone willingly involved in peddling it should be exiled from society one way or the other. FOBTs are especially streamlined. Everyone in the business knows exactly what they are doing.

That said, the same applies to lots of things: drugs almost literally, but also porn and porn-adjacent services are obvious brain-hacks, but also food, drink and even shopping are frequently structured in such a way to capture business through non-consensual manipulation of the human mind.

None of it is new: people have been losing their shirts, homes, families and lives to most of the above since before money existed, but technology-wielding capital isn't exactly freeing us from it, but instead has optimised it. Sure, it's freedom, but it's freedom of both predator and prey.

butlike

Gambling is the only vice where the store conceivably never closes; you can make a bet out of _anything_.

mulmen

What do we do with all these social exiles?

doublerabbit

"When the fun stops, stop"

That was the UK gambling advertisement reaching out to addicts. There is no fun when you're addict.

butlike

Which, ironically, is when it's at the threshold of 'not possible to stop.'

busssard

this carries value into many regions of life, from relationships, work and video games.

mulmen

[delayed]

__s

In the Year 2525 hypnotism has been confirmed. Brain protheics have amplified the effect for anyone who can afford it. With a healthy diet & conscious focus the effects can be warded off, so regulators want to wait & see if the market can solve hypnotism abuse

For the past 6 weeks I have stayed in & meditated, as last time I went out I broke my focus between taking a sip of beer & getting distracted hearing Heart of Glass, & in a moment of weakness someone in the crowd convinced me to buy everyone a round & leave a fat tip. Next time I'll have to try harder to stay focused

nashashmi

For an army that tests for drugs, wants soldiers to be clean when they come in, then they pull this shi*t on them! The level of stupidity and ignorance is staggering. The army doesn’t care about their soldiers. “All I want to say is They don’t really care about us.”

lupusreal

The government shouldn't be in the gambling business at all, neither this nor state lotteries. It creates a perverse incentive where the government starts promoting gambling instead of what they should be doing: promoting services to help gambling addicts recover.

I'm absolutely sick of seeing billboards promoting the lottery as a sound investment, and not only that but suggesting terrible ways people could waste all their winnings instead of putting it away and being financially responsible. It's sickening.

And yes, I know the argument about state lotteries outcompeting "numbers games" run by organized crime. I don't buy this argument, I don't think we're getting any net gain for society. Having connections to organized crime to participate in their gambling schemes is far less accessible than buying lotto tickets at any gas station in the country. This casual accessibility sucks far more people into gambling addictions.