Chemical process produces critical battery metals with no waste
spectrum.ieee.org
Linux on Snapdragon X Elite: Linaro and Tuxedo Pave the Way for ARM64 Laptops
linaro.org
4k NASA employees opt to leave agency through deferred resignation program
kcrw.com
Fast and cheap bulk storage: using LVM to cache HDDs on SSDs
quantum5.ca
Sapients paper on the concept of Hierarchical Reasoning Model
arxiv.org
Smallest particulate matter sensor revolutionizes air quality measurement
bosch-sensortec.com
A low power 1U Raspberry Pi cluster server for inexpensive colocation
github.com
The future is not self-hosted, but self-sovereign
robertmao.com
Cable Bacteria Are Living Batteries
asimov.press
Implementing dynamic scope for Fennel and Lua
andreyor.st
Low cost mmWave 60GHz radar sensor for advanced sensing
infineon.com
16colo.rs: ANSI/ASCII art archive
16colo.rs
Show HN: QuickTunes: Apple Music player for Mac with iPod vibes
furnacecreek.org
Rust running on every GPU
rust-gpu.github.io
Coronary artery calcium testing can reveal plaque in arteries, but is underused
nytimes.com
Janet: Lightweight, Expressive, Modern Lisp
janet-lang.org
Personal aviation is about to get interesting (2023)
elidourado.com
What went wrong for Yahoo
dfarq.homeip.net
Paul Dirac and the religion of mathematical beauty (2011) [video]
youtube.com
The white paper says the payload release doesn't have to be precisely timed, if TARS is on a circular orbit, and I do not understand why. Sure, the plane in which the payload shoots off, is defined by the orbital position of TARS. But there are 360 degrees of freedom within that plane. If we aim at e.g. a specific star, how is release timing not a critical factor? And if it is, what timer would survive the solar radiation and extreme spinning, remaining reliably operational and microsecond accurate?