Murderland: Crime and Bloodlust in the Time of Serial Killers
70 comments
·June 29, 2025vinnski
The headline reminds me of the (debunked) theory that ergot-contaminated grain was what incited the Salem witch trials - which was just as ridiculous
https://salemwitchmuseum.com/2023/05/17/debunking-the-moldy-...
andrewinardeer
Wasn't a substantial amount of lead used to solder tinned food for like 150 years? That's like two generations where lead leeched into foods. Was there a bump in serial killers from 1810's onward?
fho
150 years is more like 5-7 generations.
Hilift
Tetraethyllead was introduced into gasoline in 1922, and lasted about 70 years. The effect would have been greater after WW2 due to there were more cars and a larger population with greater desire for mobility and closer proximity to cars.
During the Depression there were fewer cars for economic reasons, and during WW2 fewer for reasons of rationing and recycling, raw material went to the war effort.
xattt
Lead may not have had as strong of an effect on adults as it did on developing brains. Post-war timelines fit for baby boomers, as they would be in young adulthood at the peak of these crimes.
Spooky23
My vote: yes. Things like policing are reactive controls.
Crime has been dropping for a long time, and it isn’t because of increased professionalism and effectiveness of police or better governance.
nurettin
And definitely not because there is better access to education and basic resources.
lvl155
I think it’s safe to say the boomers were exposed to lead the most out of anyone especially if they grew up in heavy traffic areas. That said, that’s no excuse since the Romans were probably exposed at a significantly higher rate and they churned out some ingenious projects. Or was lead introduced to Rome toward tail end?
encom
Betteridge’s Law applies here.
fasteo
The law: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no."
jama211
Very much so, and even though the article answers its own question with a no, they know many people will read the headline and only remember the link, and rumour will spread.
I can’t believe we’re _still_ allowing headlines like this in this day and age. I might even report it, because even though technically speaking the article content doesn’t spread misinformation, the title does.
gbin
This made me chuckle have you seen the YouTube titles and thumbs?
It is getting SO outrageous that some creators shadow their own channels with the same videos but with normal titles saying they need the main channel with the stupid titles "for the algorithm".
This is the end of the race to the bottom to grab the scraps of our attention.
mrkramer
But what is alternative to titles and thumbnails?
yieldcrv
I saw a court case where a mom testified against her adult child and said she drank while she was pregnant, resulting in undermining all of the child defendants decision making process resulting in the defendant’s conviction
To be honest this felt like one of those “too poor for appeal’s court” things
But a ridiculous way of treating a defendant
Imagine if we could tell someone had a mental alteration
graemep
> I saw a court case where a mom testified against her adult child and said she drank while she was pregnant
How could that even be relevant to a criminal case?
tgv
Because it affects the growth of the fetus, including development of the brain. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_alcohol_spectrum_disorde...
graemep
Someone having drunk while pregnant is not strong evidence that it had a meaningful impact. You have to drink heavily to even risk it, and to have an impact on a court case why not get medical evidence on whether or not meaningful damage has occurred.
perihelions
To reemphasize the parent's question, how is that relevant to the prosecution of a criminal trial? "The defendant is mentally ill / has a propensity to commit crimes" isn't admissible, in general.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Character_evidence#Criminal_tr...
PeterStuer
In Europe lead was used just as much in pipes and exhaust. We also have countries with broad gun availability.
We do not have the serial killers of the US level by far.
I think culture is key.
hackyhacky
True, but Europe does show a decline in crime in a time period corresponding to the banning of leaded gasoline.
https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2018/02/an-updated-le...
https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2017/02/violent-crime...
firesteelrain
Not everyone agrees that lead did cause a drop in violence. It’s one theory
hackyhacky
> Not everyone agrees that lead did cause a drop in violence. It’s one theory
Obviously. That's what we're discussing. I am simply presenting evidence to contradict the GP comment, which claims (falsely) that Europe did not see a drop in crime similar to the US's. The fact that Europe did see a drop a crime is not conclusive evidence of the lead-crime theory, but it leaves that possibility open.
If you have another theory, you are welcome to share it.
SideburnsOfDoom
This isn't a really counter-argument.
It could be (and IMHO likely is) multi-causal, with several contributing factors, including lack of social welfare (leading to people with rough childhoods), gun availability and also lead exposure in childhood.
The question at hand is how to weight the last factor. IMHO it's not zero, but I don't know enough to say just how much.
firesteelrain
You are right it is multi casual.
The hard part is untangling how much each factor contributes.
ltbarcly3
This is not accurate at all even as an apples to apples claim. US media amplifies them and you consume a lot of US media. Besides confounding factors, you have had a ton of fascist and communist governments which were filled to the gills with serial killers and frankly mass murderers, all the way up to the 2000s. They just had a legal outlet to act within. The % of europeans who have killed more than 10 civilians must be 1000x the US average over the last 100 years.
martin_a
> The % of europeans who have killed more than 10 civilians must be 1000x the US average over the last 100 years.
WTF did I just read?
Anyways, maybe have a look at this list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_shootings_in_the_...
SideburnsOfDoom
I think that the parent is also including soldiers in times of war in Europe in the 20th century.
It's still utter WTFery, but not on the basis of comparing mass shootings by civilians.
PeterStuer
You mean the only country that has 800+ military bases around the world, and has started a never ending series of 'regime change' wars and proxy wars, is the only country to have used nukes, that has a military larger than the rest of the planet combined, and an extreme domestic mass shooting problem seen nowhere else, somehow still managed to have 1000x less 10+ kills than Europe?
firesteelrain
The conversation was about serial killers and individual level violence, not military actions or geopolitical power.
ltbarcly3
Europe's high self image is based on a shell game.
Step 1: Commit horrific atrocities. Step 2: Declare that you are now a new country (with the same people), so you stop counting the atrocities against yourself.
See how it works? Germany tried to genocide half the population of Earth, the US stops them and builds a bunch of bases in Germany so they don't try that again, and now that is evidence of US abuse and aggression. It's not THAT Germany anymore, the one that did the crimes and has to be occupied to make sure they don't try to stuff every brown child on earth into a brick oven, it's Germany, the great country that is totally innocent. It's not the GB that kept half of the world's population under it's thumb to brutally extract resources and become rich, it's GB the cute country with the Queen. All the crimes have to be ignored and don't count anymore because you have free healthcare (or something).
Anyway, you completely miss the point. When the Gestapo was stuffing people into ovens, they were also running Joy Divisions. Guess what kind of guys were signing up to run these bases? In a real civilization these are the kinds of guys who show up in police statistics as serial killers.
hackyhacky
First, what you're describing is not consistent with the definition of serial killer [1].
Second, even if we include governmental killings, it's not clear how to allocate blame. For example, how many people are responsible for the Holodomor [2]? Just Joseph Stalin himself? His deputies? Every employee of the Russian government? If we consider each instance of state-sanctioned murder as ultimately being ordered by the head of state, that would not greatly increase the number of murderers, and certainly not in comparison to the daily count of civilian-on-civilian murder in the US.
Third, if we are going to include governmental killings, we should definitely include the various illegal wars that the US has engaged in, and continues to engage in. I think that would nicely balance the tables. It's important to understand that fascism and Communism do not hold a monopoly on civilian deaths [3] [4] [5]. Let's also not forget the US's continued use of the death penalty.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_killer
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_genocide
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Freedom_Deal
EDIT: formatting
ltbarcly3
I agree, except you don't understand my point. Europe has just a TON of sanctioned sadomasochistic sex-related murder crimes. Just a ton. Before Jews were stuffed into ovens many were forced to perform sex acts on their guards. So many that it was formally organized and done in the open. Exactly the sort of thing that a serial killer does. So if you're a serial killer in Germany, or Russia, or Eastern Europe, or Yugoslavia you just get a job with the secret police, and engage in your sadomasochistic rape and murder without worrying about the police finding out because you are the police. If you are a serial killer in Western Europe you might have to go to Algeria or Vietnam if you are French, or India or Africa if you are British, etc etc, plenty of places where serial killer behavior would just be ignored or encouraged. You can't even find statistics on how often this happened because nobody cared enough to keep records of it because human life was so cheap it's not worth the paper.
null
null
null
ribcage
[dead]
https://archive.is/Py9Mf