Scientific conferences are leaving the US amid border fears
464 comments
·May 24, 2025robwwilliams
True, not much data yet, but a cery real day to day factor for conference organizers. We have had two Canadians skip a US conference last month due to the dramatical worse general climate. Zoom instead. This is NOT just about immigration and passport control. It is the new ugly American zeitgeist that changes enthusiasm.
We will probably be skipping the US for two international conferences I have helped organize. Vancouver, Toronto, Montreal, Quebec, Halifax are all great alternatives for larger meetings from 2027 ti 20??.
mjevans
The 2nd, and supposed to be final, term of the current US President is scheduled to end on Jan 20th, 2029.
I am hopeful that my fellow Americans will elect a responsible, intelligent, virtuous leader in 2028 to be sworn into office on that day.
I know I'm asking a LOT. However that's one of, if not the most, important jobs in the world. We all deserve to have someone at least that qualified there.
AlecSchueler
The trust is already gone. He was voted in twice and there was enough support for the party as a whole that none of the other branches of government can contain him.
Plus he said that he intended to make the changes such as his supporters would never need to vote again. Things have already been dismantled in such ways that it will be impossible to build them back as they were.
Not to doom and gloom you out of hoping for the best but the Rubicon is rapidly fading into the distance.
mycatisblack
I must have completely missed those speeches. Looked it up,
At a "Believers' Summit" event hosted by the conservative group Turning Point Action in West Palm Beach, Florida, on July 26, 2024, Donald Trump told an audience of Christian voters:
"You gotta get out and vote. In four years, you don't have to vote again, we'll have it fixed so good you're not going to have to vote."
He also said: "Christians get out and vote. Just this time. You won't have to do it anymore. Four more years. You know what? It'll be fixed. It'll be fine. You won't have to vote anymore my beautiful Christians."
Looks like we’re out of the short term loops and well into the decadal effects with this man.As a European, I’d like to add that the impulse response on the collective memory will be multi-generational.
watwut
It is not just Trump. It is whole conservative project that is behind him. He truly represents the republican party and works towards its goals.
hoseyor
[flagged]
grues-dinner
It doesn't really matter though. If there's going to be a potential flipflop between nuttery and normality every four years, you can only really book things in the future for a couple of years after the start of a "normal" phase. And even that is assuming there aren't held-over issues that need to be legislated away by the new guy.
At that point, why even bother with the hassle and uncertainty?
authorfly
This is part of why France lost status for large events and organisations in the early-mid 20th Century until now. Quite large political swings at regular intervals and fairly ready-to-protest population = not ideal for basing stability. And it doesn't matter that France was far more stable than most countries, it was simply much less stable than America, the UK and regrettably, Germany. Frances solution seems to be not to really compete for international industry or science, but to focus on French culture and language to fit their tourism strategy.
kergonath
Even if the next president is sane, it will take a long time to change the culture. Once border control agents get more power (or the feeling that they can use their power more arbitrarily), they will want to keep it. Also, the legal framework is not going to go back in time, either.
It would take time to re-establish trust.
dtech
Several languages have idioms like these: "Trust arrives on foot, and leaves on a galloping horse"
Spooky23
The genie is out of the bottle, the die is cast, etc. We’re not going back to what was before.
I’d only put 60/40 odds on the 2028 election not being temporarily suspended due to a state of emergency.
rogerrogerr
60/40 feels very pessimistic to me (meaning I think the election is more than 60% likely to occur on Nov 7, 2028 and the results heeded more or less as usual).
If you think 60/40 is the right odds, you have some opportunities available - to make fake dollars, at least: https://manifold.markets/AndrewG/will-donald-trump-attempt-t...
I bet you could find more than a few people here to take the other side of 60/40 odds in a $100 bet.
null
gman83
There will definitely be elections, even Putin has elections. The question is whether those elections will be fair.
klntsky
[flagged]
emeril
don't get your hopes up - I fully plan on moving to Canada and sending my children to college there even if we elect a "better" president in the future
the fact that roughly half of of the electorate is fine with how things are as well as virtually all of the republicans in the senate and the house are too "scared" to do anything (complete BS as this is the very definition of their job) is really an embarrassment of civilization and humanity - apes are more evolved than we are
tsoukase
Too late. The 2028 Olympic Games will be held in Los Angeles. It will be a historical one, since those two legendary of the 80s.
ndsipa_pomu
I wonder how many foreign athletes will be barred from entry to that?
fluidcruft
It's looking like a rather large assumption that Democrats manage to rebuild trust with the public. You would think 2024 would be enough of a crisis for Democrats to get their shit in order. And yet here we are with the same fucking dinosaur generation running the party.
intended
This is a red herring. There is no winning for any party that isnt the Republican party, because there is no actual mechanism for non right wing voices to be heard on the right wing information ecosystem.
The issues is that Dems must bring their A game, to compete against a clown squad that can and will fabricate issues that havent happened, and force the dems to debate on it.
This is also a thought experiment, not a real issue, because Americans do not have that long a time horizon.
The strongest, most unified, and capable you will be is now. By the time elections come around, you will be hounded, disorganized, isolated and unable to coordinate.
motorest
> I am hopeful that my fellow Americans will elect a responsible, intelligent, virtuous leader in 2028 to be sworn into office on that day.
The US elected Biden after Trump's disastrous first term, and immediately followed up with Trump's totalitarian self-destructive second term.
null
lotsofpulp
When the other option is a woman (a non white one at that), what choice do people have?
__turbobrew__
Some Canadian companies have just straight up banned business travel to the US.
apwell23
[flagged]
intermerda
Why are you substituting words with random alphabet characters? Are you able to read the original post? Are you unable to grasp how it adds context and data point to the discussion?
__turbobrew__
> Something did something
This is a news website you know? It would be pretty uninteresting if nothing ever happened.
fabian2k
It will take time for these effect to manifest. Conferences are organized quite far in advance, so most conferences this year and part of next year would likely not be able to change locations anyway.
But because they are planned in advance they might be even more careful then. They won't just take the status today into account, but also their fears of how much worse it could get.
jagger27
Ottawa has plenty of event spaces, poor direct airport routes though. I wouldn’t count out Calgary and Edmonton either.
kergonath
Montreal and Vancouver are nice.
CoastalCoder
As an American, it's starting to feel (almost) unfair to treat us as a single group when praising or damning.
More than ever, it feels like America comprises two very different peoples.
geraltofrivia
I can appreciate that but as an Indian, the thought of subjecting myself and my devices to search for “problematic” material to attend a scientific conference is not something I am willing to do. To me, the USA is the USA.
Also, while there are a lot of people unhappy with your state, I wouldnt say the same for your citizens.
ericye16
I'm a Canadian who moved to the SF bay area after graduating. A lot of my smartest friends who came with me at the same time are actively taking steps to move back due to the political environment.
mlindner
I have several Canadian friends in the bay area and only one is considering moving back. The rest have bought houses here and are working toward permanent residency or citizenship.
null
interestoo
I was travelling to the US a few times during previous administration and each time somebody from the team was taken into little dark room for questioning, I was not travelling to the US much before so I was of opinion the way how US border treats travellers was weird to say the least, at least compared to other countries I was travelling to. Sometimes it was worse depending on particular border agent. Interestingly I travelled recently during new administration and did not notice much of a change.
illiac786
May I ask, was it for work, which country were you traveling from, what nationality do you and your colleagues have?
I may have to travel to the US this year with my family, for familial reasons, and it makes me more nervous than usual I must admit.
I am just trying to gauge if there are some criteria for pulling people in closed rooms.
interestoo
We were travelling for business from EU. My feeling was that those of us who were travelling most frequently were pulled, but apart from slight inconvenience it ended OK. We started placing bets who will it be this time :) I always had paperwork ready, letter from business I was visiting, hotel booking, phone number to business rep who would confirm my credentials, but I was never asked to produce them. Though, I don't know about travelling with family, I am not much of a touristy guy..
mlindner
My own brother had a Canadian border agent screaming and shouting at him when he went on a business trip to Canada from the US. Screaming at him about why couldn't a Canadian do his job instead of having to fly in an American.
Canada is no better, if anything they're worse in this regard.
Anamon
One anecdote doesn't support that conclusion. Talk to anyone who travelled to Canada and the U.S. frequently, about how the two compare. I used to work in academia, and know many people who travelled to both places every year for the past 20. Of course there are exceptions on both sides, but the default is overwhelmingly: Canadian border is friendly and welcoming, U.S. border is hostile and depressing.
itsjustaclock
It’s fascinating that people still see these things as new or unique to our current administration. This has been an issue for decades that were often ignored or minimized because it only affected smaller more marginalized groups of people. For example conferences involving HIV/AIDS had to contend with these issues for decades due to the blanket ban on HIV+ individuals from entering the country, even for a scientific conference. Often the conferences would continue leading to schisms in the communities and competing conferences that would ultimately disagree on fundamental principles in science and policy.
ZYbCRq22HbJ2y7
It seems new and unique, given that conferences (and scientists) are leaving?
ygjb
You know how if you pile lots of flammable things in the corner of your garage and it's fine for years, and then a toddler strolls through with a book of matches, then suddenly you get a new and unique fire?
The conferences and scientists leaving are the results of decades of policy undermining education and human rights, coupled with the rise of the alt-right, normalization of racism and misogyny, with a soupçon of neo-nazism that allowed a populist regime to rise to power. All of that was the pile of flammable things. The extrajudicial deportations, conferences and scientists leaving, and tourism crashing are the first tendrils of smoke rising in the corner. It's not too late for America to fix it.
whatshisface
The system in the US is capable of running on nothing but hope because of the availability of lending and investment. "Unfortunately" that means the average person won't receive an impossible to ignore signal that something is going bad until bankers and investors lose hope. By that point, something would have had to have happened that can't be fixed in the short term by a reversal or a sudden period of sobriety.
For a concrete example, the stock market is going up and down every time the tariff threats change tone, but the layoffs that the tariffs will make inevitable won't be done until companies run out of financiers who can be convinced the setbacks are only temporary.
tbrownaw
> leading to schisms in the communities and competing conferences that would ultimately disagree on fundamental principles in science and policy.
Ignoring the original topic and the rest of the comment, this part sounds like actually a useful thing?
If the different groups don't converge, that suggests that at least one of the consensuses is being driven by something other than verifiable facts (groupthink? conflicts of interest? politics?). Which I'd think is a useful thing to bring to the surface like that.
null
freen
Full throated and enthusiastic ethno-fascism is new.
Africaaners are enthusiastically welcomed and coming in droves, everyone else, quite the opposite.
Should tell you everything you need to know.
tim333
The shipping people off for indefinite imprisonment in El Salvador without due process or appeal is new. I realise the people they've shipped are not conference delegates but it's still a bit off putting.
TheCoelacanth
They've also started detaining people at the border for some minor visa violations where they normally would just refuse entry. That's a very real concern for conference travellers.
mattnewton
It’s a question of degree
roenxi
Has anyone done the legwork to demonstrate the degree? The linked article is lists around 6 conferences. Which is not a huge number, in the grand scheme of things, given how anti-Trump the US academy seems to be. More than 5, less than 10 and I assume conferences move around fairly regularly.
It is annoyingly typical that they managed to interview a "historian who studies international conferences" yet fail to contextualise how large 6 conferences is in the scheme of things. Thanks to the Magic of the Internet [0] I can see that hundreds of thousands of conferences have taken place since their first appearance in the late eighteenth century which isn't that informative (averages to >333/year over 3 centuries I suppose).
[0] https://www.bbk.ac.uk/our-staff/profile/8008585/jessica-rein... & https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/52195/1/BJH2300063_R.pdf
jltsiren
It's far too early to say. You can't move a conference to a different country on a short notice. You can only hold it with whatever audience you can get, postpone it, or cancel it. For larger events, it's already too late to move events scheduled for 2026, and possibly even for 2027. Maybe there will be some data in a couple of years, but until then, anecdotes and informed guesses are the best you can have.
hshdhdhj4444
Conferences are organized months if not years in advance.
The fact that 6 of them found this a big enough issue to move their conferences out of the U.S. is a huge deal.
The real impact will be felt 2-3 years from now.
MegaDeKay
Here's another example [0]: "Hacker Conference HOPE Says U.S. Immigration Crackdown Caused Massive Crash in Ticket Sales". A quote: "“We are roughly 50 percent behind last year’s sales, based on being 3 months away from the event,” Greg Newby, one of HOPE’s organizers, told 404 Media in an email." No reason to think this conference is especially different from others like it.
[0] https://www.404media.co/hacker-conference-hope-says-fewer-pe... OR https://archive.is/QWmxO
intended
An article from Nature, which is targetted at scientists, is the sign you are looking for. The fact that you are getting on HN, is indicating that you get to know of this before other people.
I can say that this is definitely an issue in converastions for me.
EasyMark
this is on a much larger scale and supported by ~40% of the USA who think Trump can do no wrong, and agree with his racism and unconstitutional imprisonment of brown people who are here to just visit or get an education. Basically now if you're not white, you are a suspect if you are coming/going internationally. I'm pretty sure some heroic person will eventually whistleblow a tape recording/email/memo that cites this as the new operating norm for the current regime.
b59831
[dead]
MegaDeKay
This is bound to happen for a lot of other events besides scientific conferences. I know of a guy that wouldn't go to a retrogaming convention for fears of being detained at the border.
nssnsjsjsjs
Its not just like you get refused entry and get sent on a return flight, there is risk of incarceration, rummaging through your digital life etc. It could be very disruptive and negative.
xeonmc
There is also the risk of being sent to completely unrelated continents based on eugenic preconceptions.
dietr1ch
This, I was "randomly selected" way too often to risk it nowadays.
hshdhdhj4444
This!
The risk of being turned away at the border always existed.
Yes it’s drastically increased now, but that’s a quantitative change which will have a quantitative effect.
What we are seeing now is a qualitative change in traveling behavior and that’s reflecting the qualitative change in the severity of punishment that may occur if there is a problem while trying to enter.
justsid
You are also asked if you have ever been denied entry into a country when travelling abroad. Even if nothing else happens and you do just get flown straight back, it can make future travels harder.
abnercoimbre
Yes, I run tech conferences and international attendance is dropping rapidly this year (we're shifting to aggressive local marketing, but it's still sad.)
braaaahp
Won’t be attending local conferences anymore.
My colleagues outside the US say that a big part of why they are bailing on the US is the public response.
They see France protest over their own internal retirement politics. They don’t see the US public protest over global destabilization through our politics.
It isn’t just Trump. The American people are completely failing to read the room.
So I am done supporting my fellow Americans as much as possible too. Enjoy your conference randos, but fuck me food and shelter and healthcare seem a bit more essential.
cshimmin
One thing you need to keep in mind is that in the US things are stacked against people who would want to protest or engage in any kind of activism.
Take a day off work to go to a rally or peaceful protest? “At will” employment means you can be fired the next day, no reason given. You got fired? Virtually all workers in the US get their health insurance through their employer, so now you and your family just lost access to medical care. It’s a really rough job market in many sectors, so it could take a few months to get a job. But since you got fired without cause, you can at least try to claim some unemployment benefits. In California, that maxes out at something like $450 a week.
Meanwhile in France if they want to fire you they have to give like 3 months notice (or pay you out for that time). Healthcare is socialized so no worries there. And if you still can’t find a job in a few months IIRC there’s fairly reasonable social benefits available.
throw__away7391
I went to a protest. I was anxious about being photographed and added to some biometric database to be used for who knows what purposes. My wife and I had a serious discussion about whether to go, the possible risks, the possibility of violence, but I ultimately convinced her to go as our civic responsibility. I left our phones at home as a precaution so as to avoid being geolocated to the site.
What I found upon arriving was an unserious mob of hippies laughing and taking selfies to post on social media. I'd made signs supporting the rule of law. The signs of the other participants were an unfocused smattering of various political goals from "tax the rich" to banning Teslas. They included what I thought was an excessive about of profanity and crude insults. I think these are unserious people and what they're doing is performative and utterly pointless.
I do not see any viable action for individual citizens to take. Everyone out there clamoring for people to do something is just pushing their own political agenda. We had an election, one side won, that's how things go, ok. What's happened since however is a clear violation of the US Constitution in more ways than one can count, but it seems there is basically no one aware of or concerned about this. I feel like I'm at a football game where one side just took out a gun and shot the referee and while he lies on the floor bleeding to death both sides are still arguing over whether there was a foul or not.
libraryatnight
Americans are doing stuff. I call my reps and their vms are full. I go to their offices and there are lots of other people there. There's been protests at state capitals, Bernie & AOC have been giving speeches and zoom meetings about organizing and canvasing. Lawyers are suing and judges are trying to use the system despite the supreme court gone mad. It's tough to get a big group photo, but people are doing stuff. I'm as angry and jaded as anybody, but I dislike this defeated "nobody is doing enough so fuck it" thing I keep seeing. It's laying the groundwork a self fulfilling prophecy.
Spooky23
It’s hard to protest. There’s no single movement, it’s just a bunch of different people. Stuff needs to get a lot worse.
eli_gottlieb
>They don’t see the US public protest over global destabilization through our politics.
Then they're not looking.
aqme28
I am really curious how the US is expecting to host the Olympics and the World Cup in the next few years.
bell-cot
Change their rules, enough to mostly work for 99.9% of would-be attendees, for the duration of the event.
jen729w
And who knows how much personal travel? Me and my partner are just setting off on an indefinite working trip around the world. Starting in SE Asia to try to save a bit of cash, but we have no longer-term plans yet.
We've long dreamed about spending 3 months in the USA. Driving across Montana. Living in NYC. Just being there, absorbing it all. (We've both been a bunch of times and love it.)
We're both white Australians. Middle-aged. Low risk. But there's no way I'm travelling to the USA now. Why would I bother? If I need some North America I'll go see Canada. Or we'll just visit Europe.
PeterStuer
Attending US conferences was always more a hassle than most other places.
The 'interrogation' before even boarding the flight was just ridiculous. And the process repeated after landing. Jeez.
bamboozled
I have friends and colleagues based in South America, when conferences are held in the USA, they never can attend, or want to. When they're held in Europe, they just appear with little hassle, it's quit perplexing to me how hard the USA makes it for them.
It's been this way forever, according to them, they're never going to even bother now.
justcallmejm
The scientific community inherently has their eyes wide open to seeing reality as it is, and the assessment that the US is a hostile place to the reality-based community is a no-brainer.
I was born in the Midwest, have lived my entire adult life in SF, and recently was relieved to get my permanent residency in Canada - moving to Vancouver, BC soon. My co-founder (who is Canadian but has lived in California for 25 years) and I know we won’t be able to attract world-class talent to a country that is trying to go back in time to pre-Enlightenment era.
freen
CIO of $20B/year ARR company: “I was going to send my kid to the US for college. Now? Never in a million years. I’m not even going to go to the US!”
Well done everyone. Well done.
For those without a choice, no threat of punishment/deportation will deter them.
For those with a choice? Arguably the people a country would want to visit/do business with/etc?
The choice is clear: the US is hostile and to be avoided.
geraltofrivia
In 2015 a PhD scholar attending a security conference was sent back citing national security concerns. This was absurd as she was an Indian, studying in Montreal and has no past involvement in any untoward thing.
In 2017, a friend doing his PhD in artifical intelligence in Germany was made to undergo a thorough interview at the border to determine if he is a threat on account of his work. Again, this was absurd to say the least.
In this March, my SO (French) chose to not attend a tier 1 conference in AI where she was going to present her work. She, having the brains for both of us, was prescient enough to cancel her trip in Feb-March, a bit before the current border policies came into full force and europeans were detained.
I have never gone, nor will I ever go to the United States. Not for scientific purposes or leisure. For over a decade I have been voicing concerns about hosting conferences in a country which is inaccessible or hostile to a vast section of the scientific community. I am glad to see this shift.
null
csomar
[flagged]
buran77
This kind of false equivalence only brings the quality of conversation down and also waters down the gravity of what's really happening. I just never expected anyone would go so low as to equate people being turned away at the border or worse, be detained, questioned, and a pile of other abuses, with a pigeon detained for carrying what was suspected to be a spy message.
No, it's not the same everywhere. No, it's not because some countries are too dumb to be criminally abusive. And no, this is not just an inevitable outcome from "being too capable at detecting real threats".
If you go so far out of your way to water down and defend the indefensible you make it close to impossible to find any charitable interpretation, instead of moral complicity or trolling.
StrauXX
I am going to the Defcon CTF Finals at the Defcon conference this year. Coming from Europe, I know of multiple people who will participate remotely because of the political climate. I would have to lie if I said that I didn't think about skipping the USA either. In the cybersecurity space especially things have always been difficult.
kernaussage
I am competing as well. Coming from Europe, it's still a bit uncertain which team members can and are willing to travel to the USA in the current political climate.
burnt-resistor
This, Harvard, WHO, NIH, and NSF changes create that sucking sound you hear, a brain drain, and people deciding not to go to the US or to leave. Such myopic stupidity in the White House weakening America's power and reputation.
api
When he started talking about a golden age I knew he was going to drive it straight into the ground.
BLKNSLVR
The New Amish: a society based on the ideals, behaviours, and technologies gleaned from severely rose-tinted memories of the 1950s.
Plus cryptocurrency.
AlecSchueler
Golden showers.
xyzal
Golden age for broligarchs
tgv
It's on purpose, at least according to some observers (Slobodian, Stiglitz). The clique behind Trump and Project 2025 want small (special) economic zones with as little interference as possible. Basically laying the ground work for exploitation, 19th century style. That requires dismantling the federal state. They don't care about the other consequences, because they don't have to bear them.
api
They’re fairly explicit about the idea that the last 100-200 years need to be undone. By that they don’t mean the technical progress. They mean human equality. The idea that there might be a connection between those two things is lost on them.
fireflash38
Sounds like feudalism
apples_oranges
For a career, the USA is as attractive as it ever was. For tourism and conferences perhaps a bit less so.
I mean.. it's still the USA.. bad government or not
testing22321
Unless you happen to be female. Or gay. Or trans. Or non-white. Or poor.
But , yes! America is as good as ever for white men!
null
https://archive.ph/iYdBT