Hosting a website on a disposable vape
bogdanthegeek.github.io
"Your" vs. "My" in user interfaces
adamsilver.io
60 years after Gemini, newly processed images reveal details
arstechnica.com
Learn x86-64 assembly by writing a GUI from scratch (2023)
gaultier.github.io
The Mythical Creatures of London
londonist.com
React is winning by default and slowing innovation
lorenstew.art
Automating Distro Updates in CI
paretosecurity.com
William Gibson Reads Neuromancer (2004)
bearcave.com
Wanted to spy on my dog, ended up spying on TP-Link
kennedn.com
I feel Apple has lost its alignment with me and other long-time customers
morrick.me
PayPal to support Ethereum and Bitcoin
newsroom.paypal-corp.com
How big a solar battery do I need to store all my home's electricity?
shkspr.mobi
Addendum to GPT-5 system card: GPT-5-Codex
openai.com
Linux phones are more important now than ever
feddit.org
Why do we keep gravitating toward complexity?
kyrylo.org
People Who Hunt Down Old TVs
bbc.com
Launch HN: Trigger.dev (YC W23) – Open-source platform to build reliable AI apps
Basics of Equality Saturation
egglog-python.readthedocs.io
Show HN: Pyproc – Call Python from Go Without CGO or Microservices
github.com
I wish my web server were in the corner of my room (2022)
interconnected.org
Anyone can explain to me how zeroproof will actually work in a way that i don't have to trust anyone instead of just switching whom i trust?
Aka someone wants to know if i'm over 18, someone needs to verify to that entity that im over 18.
If i now trust a random company to verify me, someone now needs to trust that random company. As usual with Crypto/Bitcoin the trust anker issue is not solved as far as i know.
I always need to trust someone somehow.
Btw. if i understand the blog they do a hard fork which leads again to an additional blockchain and the multi blockchain transaction problem is a hard problem to solve.
Anyone actually working on solving the issues of it or people just prefer to add additional complexity on it?