Show HN: I built a word game. My mom thinks it's great. What do you think?
whatsit.today
Dynamic Register Allocation on AMD's RDNA 4 GPU Architecture
chipsandcheese.com
North America Is Dripping from Below, Geoscientists Discover
jsg.utexas.edu
Faster interpreters in Go: Catching up with C++
planetscale.com
What If We Made Advertising Illegal?
simone.org
Exeter's unassuming co-op worker leads double life as 'Lord of the Logos'
devonlive.com
A Vision for WebAssembly Support in Swift
forums.swift.org
OpenAI's Motion to Dismiss Copyright Claims Rejected by Judge
arstechnica.com
Rich Text, Poor Text (2013)
laemeur.sdf.org
Open Source Coalition Announces 'Model-Signing' to Strengthen ML Supply Chain
pypi.org
Show HN: iPhone 2005 weird "Blob Keyboard" simulator
Great Question (YC W21) Is Hiring Applied AI Engineers
ycombinator.com
Compilers: Incrementally and Extensibly (2024)
okmij.org
Emulating an iPhone in QEMU
eshard.com
Practical Binary Analysis
practicalbinaryanalysis.com
Identifying a defective RAM IC on laptops with soldered memory
blog.piernov.org
The Importance of Fact-Checking
lithub.com
Jumping Spiders
digital.tnconservationist.org
NASA's Project Scientist Faces Painful Choices as Voyager Mission Nears Its End
gizmodo.com
Database Protocols Are Underwhelming
byroot.github.io
Recreating Daft Punk's Something About Us
thoughts-and-things.ghost.io
Observational bias is interesting. For example, if you judge by the stars visible to the naked eye, you get a very different sense of the distribution of stellar masses than if you use a telescope, because no class M main sequence stars will be included (the brightest has apparent magnitude 6.7). The intrinsically brightest stars, including many of the famously named ones, are visible to great distances and so are very overrepresented.
The most spectacular form of observational bias could be the presence of life. The planet we are on will always have life (because, we are here and we are life) regardless of how uncommon life actually is in the universe.