Doge staffer's YouTube nickname accidentally revealed his teen hacking activity
191 comments
·April 4, 2025KillenBoek
kelnos
Xennial here, too, and I muse about this often. I don't think I'd ever framed it quite like you have, that I'm a part of the last group of people who don't have our youthful misdeeds immortalized on the internet. That's a big one, to be sure.
But I do think of other aspects. People born from the late '90s onward don't really know a world without the WWW, and don't (or barely) remember a world without smartphones and tablets. They don't remember a time before texting. A time when you had to plan ahead if you wanted to meet your friends somewhere, and if something went wrong, it was difficult to communicate to figure out what was going on.
They don't remember when getting computers to do things was hard. When it was common to build your own machine from parts, and when you'd almost always upgrade parts in your existing computer instead of buying a new one. They don't remember when laptops were a luxury, and when people instead brought pencil and paper to class so they could take notes. They don't remember floppy disks, and many don't remember CD-ROM or DVD-ROM, or their burnable counterparts.
They don't remember printing out directions, and not having GPS navigation in their pockets. They don't remember having to use paper maps, and actually plan out routes ahead of time for any non-trivial car trip.
They don't remember CRT TVs in classrooms, or "portable" film projectors. They don't remember slides or overhead projectors or microfilm. They don't remember bulky camcorders that recorded to VHS tapes. Everything is high definition for them. Many younger folks have never seen a music CD or cassette tape; ironically many have seen vinyl since it's become retro-popular again.
Certainly there are things that we don't (or barely) remember, like "party line" phones and black-and-white-only TVs. But man, it seems like there was an unusually huge burst of technological progress while we were growing up.
KillenBoek
I could not agree more, but you put it up much more eloquent than I did.
I miss VCR rentals, my cassette player and the magic of my first XT computer with MFM disks. I miss the apple //c and hopping online just to check for some information. I miss the craftsmanship of all those self made websites where you kept a list of URL’s. I miss the points where people put stuff on the internet just to share and what they made and were proud of it. I miss the trips with friends to the arcade hall where we would take turns on operation wolf. E-Mailing the friend you made during the holidays and be able to send pictures was some kind of magic.
I truely hate what the internet has become. A centralized corporate greed machine that exploits people and squeezes them for maximum profits. People are more interested in likes and retweets than in genuine contact.
I am getting old… grumpy… bitter because the thing I loved was taken from me.
pixxel
[dead]
nkrisc
Born in 1989 and I feel like I was one of the last kids to grow up with and without l those things, I can remember almost all them disappearing.
I remember driving back to college both with printed directions and then with navigation on an iPhone.
lukan
" But man, it seems like there was an unusually huge burst of technological progress while we were growing up."
Lets see, if it remains unusual, or if we all have to adopt even more drastically while we are alive.
(My biggest adoption right now is rather, that the era of peace is over)
elicash
He got a legal threat when he was 19 and claimed to be no longer hacking people's paypals. We don't actually know that he was a minor when he stopped.
I think it's fine to say that things done even at 19 or younger shouldn't be with people forever. But it's certainly newsworthy, given the types of sensitive information DOGE staff are given access to. People can decide for themselves if it's a problem or if it's actually smart to hire people with hacking backgrounds for reasons some folks here in Hacker News would argue. The idea it's out-of-bounds to even report on it, not by you but others here, is wild.
firefax
I'm glad that even if you found my teenage hacking handle, the forum it was used on is long defunct and not indexed by the wayback machine.
I drifted away from security research in my early 20s partly because of the fear instilled reading about Kevin's trials and tribulations[1]...
I think teens today think they're elite when they forget that bitcoin and even pre-paid cards, nor ubiquitous wifi were present in those times.
It's a lot easier to be anonymous nowadays -- gone are the days of scanning for poorly secured SSH boxes to use as jump boxes, now someone can go off to Starbucks and spin up a whole ass botnet or just get a burner sim to use for a month as a hotspot.
They conflate that ability to hide in the noise as a mark of skill, and then they make mistakes.
[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20050619225554/https://www.linux...
INTPenis
I was a menace online until around 2008. I'm so glad most of my history is erased, and nobody knows my old aliases.
Now in my 40s working for big enterprise.
galactus
He is probably more of a menace now than before tho
madethisnow
based on what?
red-iron-pine
Change control meetings, architecture review boards, requirements reviews, release approvals, etc. etc.
oefrha
People forget that Robert Morris of Y Combinator was a convicted felon, in fact the first under CFAA IIRC (not that I believe his intent was nefarious at the time). He’s fine now.
TheCondor
He’s owned it though. Did his probation and community service.
Many, maybe most of us did stupid things, it’s part of a hacker youth. Owning it, admitting it, that’s a big part of building trust and proving to others that you’ve grown and changed.
oefrha
Kinda hard to not own it when you’re convicted.
red-iron-pine
also wasn't his dad NSA?
thoroughburro
Dismantle many democracies in your time? Then not that similar.
ta1243
Looks like he was a script-kiddie, at most he dismantled some game-cheating sites. Maybe he used back-orifice to open someone's cd drive for the lolz.
(This assumes he wasn't just making it up)
Sounds a very familiar background.
His support of a horrendous reigime today is unrelated to his actions in his youth.
moomin
I dunno, DOGE's activities feel very much like a public policy version of being a script kiddie.
1234letshaveatw
Democracy = spending tax dollars
k12sosse
You are a contemporary yuppie, congratulations!
hansmayer
Obligatory 'username checks out' comment :)
SenorKimchi
> Reuters noted that the Deputy Attorney General’s office is in charge of investigations into various crimes, "including hacking and other malicious cyber activity."
Assuming this is true, wouldn't a history of hacking activity actually be an upside? I don't like Musk but I'm not a fan of the negative spin. Hell, when I was 15 I'm sure some things I did could now be charged as "hacking" or "cyberterrorism" or something much harsher than the actual reality under today's laws.
edit after reading further along:
> Among them was Jonathan Rusch, a 25-year DOJ veteran prosecutor now in academia, who told Reuters that Stanley's apparent history of disclosing illegally acquired data should have prompted "serious concerns."
Is this guy a veteran who prosecutes, a guy who prosecutes veterans, or something else? It feels even weirder to spin the Doge employees as inexperienced kids (which they may be) but then to call a 25 year old critic a veteran prosecutor.
batch12
I don't think the article is saying that the prosecutor is 25 years old. It's saying that he has 25 years of experience as a prosecutor.
SenorKimchi
Haha thank god. I really confused myself reading that. I am truly an idiot today.
jalk
And if the current laws prevent you from getting a security clearance, then that is what it is. Sure the laws can be changed, but in this context it’s probably better to exclude some “reformed” people than letting “criminals” through.
yahoozoo
I feel like this was a lot of people that grew up on the computers and the Internet in the 90s/early 2000s before social media took off. If anything this gives him credibility. Beats being a boot camp graduate normie.
swaits
Agree. I grew up in the era of phreaking and when I see something like this it makes me happy. We want the tinkerers, the curious, the people always pushing on the margins.
watwut
It is not necessary to be an asshole with no regard to others to be curious. Maybe we should stop glamorizing these.
mschuster91
For all I love to dunk on Musk and the 47th... there is a lot of truth in the words that most talented nerds start out as hackers in the negative interpretation of the word or get other kinds of run-ins with the law. Hell, many years ago one of the three letter agencies complained that they have to reject too many people for weed convictions.
At the core of it, companies (and the three-letter agencies) want highly experienced people, and the most experience, creativity and wisdom can be had by, well, breaking rules. When you're up against other nation states, you need people with the mindset to question things.
ludston
A lot of people like to tell themselves that breaking into other people's computers is about curiosity or activism or some other such virtue.
I don't see it. What I see is post-hoc rationalisation to justify lust for a feeling of power and control over others.
Practically any virtue you ascribe to "hackers" you can give to those kids that break into people's cars and take them on joyrides.
calgoo
To me its more about the intent and actions. If you figured out how to hack something, and possibly leave a note for the admin to fix their systems, thats one thing.
If you figure out how to hack something, and your first thought is to trash / destroy the system, thats the crime.
So personally: > "where Stanley, at 15, bragged about fucking up servers" is more damning to me then the actual hacking part.
stavros
I disagree. I definitely have the curiosity to break into things all the time. There's a difference between unlocking a car, leaving a note saying "I unlocked your car" and locking it again, and unlocking it to crash it.
yyyk
That's not as innocuous as you put it. From Godfather's horse head to the Bibilical story of Saul's robe, that can have a very different meaning and feeling.
kelnos
I think both of those things do give people that rush of power and control over others. Certainly one is harmless and the other... not so much.
mschuster91
> I don't see it. What I see is post-hoc rationalisation to justify lust for a feeling of power and control over others.
There's always two sides to a medal. I think that the executive branches of government - across the Western world - suffer from lethargy caused because barely anyone in public service is willing to question, much less stretch or even bend, the rules in power.
A government obviously cannot be purely made out of rulebreakers and, frankly, toddlers and imbeciles. We see this in the current US administration. But it cannot be made out of "we always did it this way" people either, because that's how you end up with systems and processes that are so hopelessly fossilized that no one even understands why these systems are the way they are.
ludston
I'm talking about the virtues that you've just tried to paint on people that practice breaking into other peoples computers for fun.
It seems like what you are looking for is a discussion about whether or not it it is ethical for bureaucrats and elected officials ought to circumvent or ignore their countries democratic processes and laws.
I'm sure there are some ethical justifications for doing this in some hypothetical situations, but really I'm not sure it's as useful to be discussing hypotheticals rather than specifics in this space.
croes
And what qualifies a nerd and hacker to audit systems whose full impact they don’t know and whose programming language they aren’t experienced in?
Would you ask a rocket scientist to do a brain surgery?
blatantly
They'd get training presumably. I wasn't qualified for my current job. Luckily they have training! And people to help.
croes
They got trained in all the department activities and laws they now work in?
How many years of training were that?
MPSimmons
Most of the rocket scientists I know would refuse to perform brain surgery on the basis of qualifications. The maturity and professionalism shows itself in the discretion.
beeflet
Managing the government isn't brain surgery. It's not that specialized.
blatantly
Hire a burglar to give home security advice.
pc86
This absolutely happens a lot, not at the individual level but security companies absolutely hire former criminals without violent convictions who know what they're talking about and have turned their life around.
axegon_
You basically just described rebellious youth, which we have all been at some point in our lives. And this statement is complete and utter bs. The problem is that comrade muskov is not a technical person, he is just a "marketing strategist" (quotation marks since I don't want to offend people who actually know what they are doing). Here's the painful truth: most governments have appalling security practices and it's a miracle that the world still exists. Finding vulnerabilities or leaks is not a hard task and it only requires patience - there are dozens of such examples in my own country alone and the only reason no one has sounded the alarm is because two things are going to happen: media scandal for 2 days, then everyone will forget about it and the second thing that will happen is that whoever rings the alarm will be dragged in by security agencies for years to get questioned about what they were looking for and they will not accept "I know you are morons and I don't trust you with handling my data in a service that is completely open to the general public". "Run-ins with the law" has nothing to do with talent and if anything, it's the absence of a talent if that resulted in "run-ins with the law". That is a clear indication that the people involved have no idea what they are doing and just managed to connect two simple dots after a "complete 2 hour hacking crash course - FREE, pls subscribe for more". The simple fact is that musk has no goddamn clue about what he is doing or talking about: "the government does not run relational databases". Right comrade, cause precisely the usa spending service which you are referring to is not a django app using psql: https://github.com/fedspendingtransparency/usaspending-api/b...
b3lvedere
""Politics are polarizing because humans tend to label people and put them into buckets," Stanley said. "Once labeled, individuals are often treated according to the bucket they are placed in, rather than considering each topic. This oversimplifies complex issues and contributes to division."
Which is exactly what most politicians do to non-policitians....
"We're sorry" (c) Southpark
huxley
Hardly just politicians
Seamus was coming out of the pub with his son when he stopped and put an arm around the youngster. He nodded towards the village in front of them and said, “You know, I built half the homes in this village but nobody calls me Seamus the homebuilder.”
Then with a wave of his arm, he said, “And I worked on half the roads in this village but nobody calls me Seamus the roadbuilder.”
Seamus sighed, put his two hands on his son’s shoulders and, looking him hard in the eye, said, “But you f**k one sheep …”
StefanBatory
According to the previous party that ruled the country, my entire existence was "ideological" and I was a "rainbow disease".
And then those same politicals complain, why everything is so tribal :P
megadata
Things are also being labelled left/right, where they really should be labelled humane/inhumane or normal/sociopathy, criminal/not.
bitbasher
If people knew the kinds of things I did and said online in my youth I'd be cancelled too.
Kids do and say stupid things. Kids get into trouble.
This is especially true if you grew up with a keen interest in computers, programming and for some reason, gaming.
watwut
I had interest in programming and never tried to exploit someone elses systems. What stopped me was knowing that it would "wrong thing to do", that it would be unethical. People here will pontificate for hours over kids reading less or whatever and then turn around and treat activities like this as a proof of something positive.
There are plenty of kids who are not acting like, well, entitled assholes. They have interest in programing, gaming, computers and enough impulse control to not do these. It is not something positive - even if you grow out of it.
bitbasher
Yes, not everyone with interest in games and programming was a degenerate like me. With that being said, there sure were a lot of us.
archagon
Getting cancelled is one thing, gaining security clearance and unconstrained access to everyone's health/tax/social security/etc. data is another.
ZeroGravitas
Working for DOGE is a much greater stain on his character (and/or intelligence if he's a true believer).
Imagine writing on your resume that you did a cost efficiency project that added hundreds of billions in costs and killed millions of people.
A script kiddie youth hardly compares.
swaits
Your comment is apparently stained by your political views. It is really far from reality, lacks substance and objectivity, and comes off as unhinged.
mexicocitinluez
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/03/15/opinion/forei...
Which part exactly is "far from reality, lacks substance and objectivity"?
anonym29
In lacking objectivity, is it not objectively false that "millions" have died from this?
dopidopHN
I had the same initial reaction but time will tell.
bakugo
> added hundreds of billions in costs and killed millions of people
Could you provide a source for this? Or is this just an r/politics moment?
mexicocitinluez
subsistence234
DOGE didn't abolish PEPFAR, they reduced its budget by 25%. Probably because ~50% of that budget was being wasted. There's likely still a big buffer before anyone runs out of meds.
Also there are lots of private donors who would make up the difference (if it's only 20% of Americans, that's more than 65 million people, who can easily come up with 25% shortfall of the $6.5B budget, that's less than $10 per person).
anonym29
What DOGE activities are you referring to that added hundreds of billions in costs and killed millions of people?
NilMostChill
https://www.wired.com/story/doge-rebuild-social-security-adm...
Though I'm counting that as future potential costs and deaths.
Ignoring the obvious opinion of the author, anybody who has ever worked on any sort of medium to large scale migration, refactoring or rewriting of a computer system knows that's a comically ridiculous timescale and when it inevitably fails there will be consequences, counted in both money and lives.
But that's a (very near) future fuck-up that he will almost certainly spin or move the goalposts for.
That you can draw a direct line to right now, not much other than all the cuts to critical infrastructure.
To be clear, I'm not arguing against cuts and efficiency initiatives, i'm saying he's an idiot who doesn't know what he's doing, so his implementation will be shoddy and dangerous.
See: The Cybertruck, The Boring Company, The Decline of X.
As you are implying though, nothing major so far, aside from USAID i suppose (or the VA), does removing systems actively (and provably) preventing deaths count?
These are systematic problems that will take a while to shake out into their inevitable consequences.
He'll probably still fail upwards though, unless he gets luigi'd or just drops dead of a ket induced heart attack or something.
anonym29
[flagged]
woodruffw
They’re presumably talking about things like USAID and PEPFAR.
(We haven’t seen the costs of slashing these materialize yet, but with PEPFAR in particular there’s a very good chance millions will die without access to the drugs provided under the program.)
sorcerer-mar
Including more than half a million children born with HIV!
anonym29
Under this logic, aren't all preventable deaths (no matter how much it costs to prevent that death) the same as murder? Doesn't that technically make all of us guilty of murder if we are not all spending our entire paychecks preventing the deaths of others?
rob
All this was pretty common back in the AOL days. Kelly Hallissey would call your parents, you'd get 2 char screen names just by editing the HTML source code before submitting, end users would run Sub7 and let you control their computers, DosFX and PatOrJK were thriving sites, Dolan would get pounds of dog food delivered to his house by anons for pissing them off.
DeathArrow
I did my fair share of hacking when I was 20. Most of it was out of curiosity and stupidity and I tried to never produce any damage. Have I compromised a big website or government server I never leaked credentials or defaced anything. In fact I never bragged publicly and I tried to be quiet, unseen and tried to erase my traces.
moktonar
I’ve heard about a guy nicknamed Condor who had similar issues but turned out to be one of the best of all times..
What I want to say is that you can’t always judge a person by his past
I’m happy in spend my youth during the 90s so none of the stupid things I did is on the internet or on digital photography. All those happy silly things are tucked away on analog print somewhere only I can access it.
Being a Xennial is truely a blessing and I regret for kids not to have that anymore.