‘The Celts: A Modern History’ by Ian Stewart Review
32 comments
·March 21, 2025netfortius
Rule to remember: all Gauls (Gaulois) were Celts, but not all Celts were Gauls
nivertech
> Rule to remember: all Gauls (Gaulois) were Celts, but not all Celts were Gauls
and not all Gauls (Gaulois) ... were Gauls
See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galicia_(Spain)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galicia_(Eastern_Europe)
DiggyJohnson
All I know is that all Gaul is divided into three parts.
satvikpendem
Ave Caesar.
I_complete_me
Having reading the posts thus far and having listening to, say, Indians speak English I can't help saluting thus:
Awe Kaiser
Languages are a hodge-podge.
bschmidt204
[flagged]
fdb345
[flagged]
neallindsay
I feel like any article that talks about "Celts" or uses the word "Celtic" should clarify that it starts with a hard "c". Americans familiar with the basketball team will probably pronounce it wrong otherwise.
Jtsummers
The US is only around 5% of the global population right now, and many of us, if not most, know the correct pronunciation (for uses other than the basketball team). There's no reason to bog down articles with pandering nonsense.
like_any_other
The correct pronunciation depends on language (German vs. Deutsch, for an extreme example), so non-English speakers could still use the wrong pronunciation when speaking English. In my own language, 'celts' sounds like 'kelts', but until now I thought the correct way to say it in English was 'selts'.
littlestymaar
This exactly. In French we use a soft “c” and I assumed English did the same because the only use I knew was about Larry Bird's team!
pasc1878
For the rest of the world they will have the same problem as the Americans except they know the word from the football club Celtic which is pronounced with a soft c as well.
neolithicum
And others still will not have heard of either and would think the clubs are pronounced like the historic culture
alsetmusic
And then there are those of us who are history nerds who don’t even consider the possibility of pronouncing it otherwise. I think a history-based domain and a book with “history” in the title will self-select this group.
bee_rider
Is there an actual negative association with the “Selt” pronunciation or something? It is the French version of a word, which was at times applied to the French and the Irish (among others). Maybe it can be used to celebrate their shared heritage of having to deal with English nonsense…
DonaldFisk
In English Celt is generally pronounced kelt nowadays. Celtic is always pronounced seltik when referring to sports teams (e.g. Celtic Football Club), but keltik otherwise, e.g. Celtic languages.
caper2025
Resident of Cape Breton, Nova Scotia (trans. New Scotland) here. In somewhat of an acknowledgment of this issue, we've used "Keltic". See for e.g. Keltic Lodge:
jimnotgym
How the Anglo Saxon English pronounce it is not really the point. In Wales, Scotland and Ireland, the Celtic fringe, we call ourselves Kelts... the football club is a fun anomaly! That is definitely Seltic
timeon
> Celtic Football Club
Interesting, there are to "C"s here but they aren't same letter...
jimnotgym
For a bit more fun, inside the Celtic (hard 'c') fringe, in Glasgow you will find Celtic (soft 'c') football club!
null
timeon
> hard "c"
So "k" (as opposed to "s")?
I still find it strange that there is letter "c" in English, while not really used.
dfawcus
sure soft 'c' is used, e.g. century, celebrate, cease, certain
littlestymaar
Why is it pronounced like that in English? And why are the Boston Celtics pronounced differently? For thr record in French we pronounce Celtes with a soft "c".
spookie
English doesn't share the same linguistic root, so these differences are bound to appear. Well, if you take out indo-european that is.
littlestymaar
> English doesn't share the same linguistic root. […] Well, if you take out indo-european that is.
It's a bit more complex, English is half a Germanic language but also half French.
But that doesn't explains why “Celtic” is pronounced differently in “Boston Celtics”.
Thanks. This looks like a good book and probably one I'll buy. I have many books on the "Celts" and their history, plus many more on the Iron Age in general. It's a fascinating period unfortunately let down by the lack of many good sources. The Greeks and then the Romans were very confused about these people and that's made it very hard to sort out the reality. As the review states, add a large helping of racism (not necessarily all of the negative sort), nationalism, romanticism and mythology and it can be a recipe for many competing histories. Hopefully we're starting to untangle what we can with help from books like Stewart's.