OpenAI’s Windsurf deal is off, and Windsurf’s CEO is going to Google
theverge.com
ETH Zurich and EPFL to release a LLM developed on public infrastructure
ethz.ch
Preliminary report into Air India crash released
bbc.co.uk
A software conference that advocates for quality
bettersoftwareconference.com
Upgrading an M4 Pro Mac mini's storage for half the price
jeffgeerling.com
Andrew Ng: Building Faster with AI [video]
youtube.com
Bill Atkinson's psychedelic user interface
patternproject.substack.com
Astronomers race to study interstellar interloper
science.org
HDD Clicker generates HDD clicking sounds, based on HDD Led activity
serdashop.com
Activeloop (YC S18) Is Hiring AI Search and Python Back End Engineers(Onsite,MV)
careers.activeloop.ai
Monorail – Turn CSS animations into interactive SVG graphs
muffinman.io
'123456' password exposed chats for 64M McDonald's job applicants
bleepingcomputer.com
Show HN: RULER – Easily apply RL to any agent
openpipe.ai
Introduction to Digital Filters
ccrma.stanford.edu
Lead pigment in turmeric is the culprit in a global poisoning mystery (2024)
npr.org
At Least 13 People Died by Suicide Amid U.K. Post Office Scandal, Report Says
nytimes.com
Show HN: Pangolin – Open source alternative to Cloudflare Tunnels
github.com
2-4 wire converters / hybrids (2009)
sound-au.com
DiffuCoder: Understanding and Improving Masked Diffusion Models for Code Gen
arxiv.org
I've been slightly annoyed by how the Speculative Decoding paper has gotten all the credit for the technique – I first learned about the technique from a paper more than a year older[1], Shallow Aggressive Decoding.
They introduce the same method, but apply it to grammatical error correction, meaning the "draft" output is just the input itself. The Speculative Decoding paper tries to emphasize differences between this and their method, saying that theirs is more general, as they apply it to more domains, allowing the draft to come from a smaller model, and extend it to allow sampling.
All of that is great, and deserves another paper, but doesn't deserve the credit for inventing and rights to rename the method, especially when they were aware of Shallow Aggressive Decoding before uploading their first draft.
[1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.04970