Your camera can take 3D photos. Your screen can display 3D photos.
69 comments
·February 26, 2025thih9
blululu
Was going to say the same thing. Presenting stereo pairs has a lot of layout and resolution issues to say nothing of the fact that some people have stereo blindness to varying degrees (lazy eye is an extreme case). The author is correct that stereo depth can greatly enhance an image, but a wigglegram does this at full resolution with no visual puzzle solving.
whycome
I’m surprised that phone manufacturers don’t stick cameras on opposite ends of the phone to allow the quick capture of these.
CGamesPlay
Since the advent of models like Depth Anything, you can now convert 2D images into this effect using them plus a bit of creative processing. Here's a non-technical overview that plugs some software and talks about the underlying models: https://www.owl3d.com/blog/2d-to-stereoscopic-3d-with-ai-dep...
Bonus, I also found this real-time 3D-ifier for your screen: https://github.com/zjkhurry/stereopsis-anything
colingauvin
This is very common in structural biology papers, where you need to make figure of complex 3D arrangements of atoms, but the figures must be printed in 2D. Typically using molecular modeling software, you find your view of choice. Then you rotate +- 0.5° and render two images, and put those side by side as a stereo pair figure.
It takes quite a bit of practice to see them well:
https://spdbv.unil.ch/TheMolecularLevel/0Help/StereoView.htm...
regularfry
I did this on a school project back in the 90's, with a structure of quinol clathrate that was completely wrong but very pretty. I was very into povray at the time. My chemistry teacher didn't quite know what to make of it...
Karawebnetwork
When they wrote "your screen can display 3D photos", I thought it would be a hardware hack and not something that depends on a human physiology hack.
Something like stereoscopic GIFs come to mind, e.g. https://tenor.com/fr-CA/view/dain-stereoscopic-daingifs-3d-m...
In other words, taking the two images and swapping them quickly creates the illusion of depth.
Edit:
Looking into it, there's a word for it. Wiggle stereoscopy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiggle_stereoscopy
zro
There's a whole bunch of these over at https://old.reddit.com/r/wigglegrams/ if you want more
fritzo
A great source for stereo pairs is NOAA's aerial imagery data, consisting of various snapshots along an airplane's trajectory. For example here is a stereo pair of Desecheo Island:
https://cdn.coastalscience.noaa.gov/datasets/aerialphotodb/u...
https://cdn.coastalscience.noaa.gov/datasets/aerialphotodb/u...
EDIT it can be tedious to discover such pairs. If only there were a tool...
smusamashah
Those who fail to cross eye/parallel eye these images can try looking at these through a (DIY) binocular (empty pipes/used kitchen roll should work the same).
It will only work with parallel eye images though (at the end of this article).
ben7799
I can generally see the Magic Eye pictures very well.. these are way harder.
The tiny thumbnails at the bottom of the page work, but the larger images I can't cross my eyes enough.
I think it depends greatly on getting the screen/image size just the right size and also getting the viewing distance right. On large monitors it seems harder to see.
Agree2468
> You can do this by holding your finger substantially in front of the image, and focusing solely on the finger with your eyes, while turning your mind’s attention to the image behind it while keeping your eyes still.
This tip in the article helped me a lot, it's much easier to cross your eyes further with something to actually focus on
ortusdux
It's helpful if you can smoothly zoom in on the images. Start zoomed out far enough that you can easily see the effect, and then slowly enlarge the images. Your brain will work to keep them in focus.
on_the_train
I believe the author switched left and right. Because the inverse ones at the bottom work fine
moultano
Magic eye pictures are viewed by diverging your eyes, so the "parallel view" versions at the bottom work correctly with that method.
"Cross view" pictures require converging your eyes, so the images have to be in the opposite position from what your eye would see.
LVB
I’ve been able to view these type of pictures forever. But I’ll credit the article with today being the first time I’ve actually taken them myself, put them side by side in my notes app, and been pretty impressed with how simple it was to get a neat effect.
moultano
Great! I wrote this in the hopes that more people would start making them, because I love them.
zehaeva
Ugh, there's some people out there who cannot see these. Not for a lack of trying, I've personally been trying since the 90s.
AndrewStephens
I have always had trouble with magic-eye pictures - I am told my eyes are quite different shapes. I can see stereograms with some effort.
I believe that there is a small percentage of the population for whom stereoscopic images (including 3d films) just don't work at all. Either they lack the ability to perceive depth directly or their brains aren't fooled by images with no parallax relative to their eye movements. I don't have any cites for this though.
smusamashah
Have you tried using pipes/kitchen towel rolls?
As in, try doing something like this:
1. Zoom the images small enough to be almost parallel to your eyes.
2. Make a binocular out of used kitchen rolls.
3. Each side should look at exactly one of the images
It should just work. Both images should converge like they do in a binocular.
(you can then try removing this DIY binocular suddenly and see if you can maintain focus)
tantalor
There are two communities, you need to find out which one you belong to.
https://www.reddit.com/r/CrossView
https://www.reddit.com/r/ParallelView
There is a test image you can try:
https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fg...
Whichever "view" looks to be closer is the one you should use.
alistairSH
I don't get it... the reddit image is the same on both sides. Trying to look at it cross-eyed just gives me a headache.
"Foreground text describes viewing type" - there is no foreground, it's just text on a page?
StevenNunez
I don't think I understand what the image is supposed to do. I can only see from one eye at a time.
cromulent
Amblyopia and monocular diplopia here. No way I can see these, my brain won't let me.
wkat4242
It took me a while too. Especially those double images that look totally contorted and only come out when you relax your focus. It took ages but suddenly they popped and now i can do them every time. Once they came through they were crystal clear.
kookster310
The trick for me was to completely cross my eyes and produce the double images, then slowly uncross/cross them until I could start to see the image, which eventually clears up.
stewarts
I am with you. I could also never see the hidden image things. Been trying for 40 years.
dist-epoch
Do you manage to align the two small white squares above each picture so they are on top of each other?
tombert
I love this effect. I had a book of Magic Eye pictures as a kid, which was a similar effect.
I'm not sure how practical the "crossing your eyes to get 3D" thing actually is, it makes my eyes water after a minute or so, but it's still sort of cool to see my cheapy monitor doing 3D without any special glasses.
tomw1808
I had the same book - the one with the black border? :) There was a dolphin or something, right? So long ago, can barely remember...
The water eye thing only happens to me if I cross my eyes and focus before the picture and not behind the picture. The latter takes some time to let the eyes relax, but its much more natural.
alnwlsn
I only learned somewhat recently that a lot of (or all?) Magic Eyes are meant to be parallel viewed instead of cross eyed. The difference was pretty impressive the first time I saw one correctly.
regularfry
I seem to recall that Magic Eye pictures had you decross your eyes, so you were looking past the page. It was a bit harder to do.
RIMR
If you stitch the photos together seamlessly, you can display them on a VR headset in a really natural way. I take stereo images in landscape mode, stitch them together top/bottom, and then enjoy them on my Quest 2 using the Pigasus media player.
If you use a 180° fisheye lens, you can immerse yourself in the scene. just make sure to keep the camera perfectly level, or you'll end up making yourself sick if you try to view the images unadjusted.
voytec
"Wow, a sailboat!"
rahimnathwani
most stereograms are designed to look correct when you cross your eyes
This is how I look at stereograms (looking nearer than the page), but at least some of the images on this page seem like they're designed for the other way around (looking in the distance, beyond the page).This one looks weird when I look at it cross eyed, but fine when I look at the other way.
https://moultano.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/17...
moultano
Yes, the ones at the bottom, in the "Parallel View" section are designed to be viewed the other way.
rahimnathwani
Sorry, I stopped reading part way and was just viewing the cool images! That will teach me!
I was confused that some were fine and others (the later ones) looked weird!
I prefer wigglegrams. If you're looking for an example - Wikipedia page has one from 1927[1]!
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiggle_stereoscopy