California invests in battery energy storage, leaving rolling blackouts behind
latimes.com
The Journey Before main()
amit.prasad.me
Show HN: Diagram as code tool with draggable customizations
github.com
How programs get run: ELF binaries
lwn.net
Show HN: Shadcn/UI theme editor – Design and share Shadcn themes
shadcnthemer.com
ARM Memory Tagging: how it improves C/C++ memory safety (2018) [pdf]
llvm.org
Agent Lightning: Train agents with RL (no code changes needed)
github.com
In memory of the Christmas Island shrew
news.mongabay.com
Testing out BLE beacons with BeaconDB
blog.matthewbrunelle.com
Rock Tumbler Instructions
rocktumbler.com
An Efficient Implementation of Self, a Dynamically-Typed Object-Oriented Langua [pdf]
courses.cs.washington.edu
AI, Wikipedia, and uncorrected machine translations of vulnerable languages
technologyreview.com
Show HN: LLM Rescuer – Fixing the billion dollar mistake in Ruby
github.com
Load-time relocation of shared libraries (2011)
eli.thegreenplace.net
Project Amplify: Powered footwear for running and walking
about.nike.com
ProEnergy repurposes jet engines to power data centers
datacenterdynamics.com
Jacqueline – A minimal i386 kernel written in Pascal (2019)
github.com
Making a micro Linux distro (2023)
popovicu.com
Show HN: We tried to build a job board that isn't awful
teeming.ai
Torchcomms: A modern PyTorch communications API
pytorch.org
I was wondering why the article didn't show the actual ansatz anywhere. So I looked it up on Wikipedia [1] and then I understood why. It's a product over pairs around a sum over permutations around an exponential of a sum over pairs involving a "scattering phase shift function" (and I'm simplifying here).
Still would have appreciated it being in the article.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethe_ansatz#Discussion