OS maintained by a single developer since 1997: Visopsys
visopsys.org
Policy, privacy and post-quantum: anonymous credentials for everyone
blog.cloudflare.com
How I Use Every Claude Code Feature
blog.sshh.io
Updated practice for review articles and position papers in ArXiv CS category
blog.arxiv.org
Claude Code Can Debug Low-Level Cryptography
words.filippo.io
GHC now runs in the browser
discourse.haskell.org
Show HN: Why write code if the LLM can just do the thing? (web app experiment)
github.com
SailfishOS: A Linux-based European alternative to dominant mobile OSes
sailfishos.org
Beginner-friendly, unofficial documentation for Helix text editor
helix-editor.vercel.app
3M Diskette Reference Manual (1983) [pdf]
retrocmp.de
SQLite concurrency and why you should care about it
jellyfin.org
Why "Everyone Dies" Gets AGI All Wrong
bengoertzel.substack.com
How to Build a Solar Powered Electric Oven
solar.lowtechmagazine.com
The Smol Training Playbook: The Secrets to Building World-Class LLMs
huggingface.co
OpenDesk by the Centre for Digital Sovereignty
opendesk.eu
The hardest program I've ever written (2015)
journal.stuffwithstuff.com
Show HN: A simple drag and drop tool to document and label fuse boxes
github.com
Austria: Pylons as sculpture for public acceptance of expanding electrification
goodgoodgood.co
Chat Control proposal fails again after public opposition
andreafortuna.org
CharlotteOS – An Experimental Modern Operating System
github.com
Show HN: KeyLeak Detector – Scan websites for exposed API keys and secrets
github.com
So... what happens if/when people discover that this is not in fact the solution to their problems?
It has been an article of faith for decades that the government is the problem. But the people who say that have never actually gone about cutting it. That has created a perpetual cycle of demanding to end the government, and then not doing it. That makes the government a permanent villain in their minds.
Now they're doing it. Probably, they're doing it harder than most of their supporters imagined. Some of it may be restrained by courts, but it appears that the government will be drastically cut regardless.
Maybe the government really is the problem, and we'll all get along better with a civil service in shambles. If so, yippee.
But conversely, suppose that things don't get better? I'm not even talking about the scenario where the economy crashes, international influence disappears, etc. I just mean that things just tick along as they always have -- just as in the past, Presidential administrations haven't actually had dramatic day-to-day effects on people's lives.
In that scenario, what will be the reaction of people whose primary goal was to purge the civil service? Will they continue to stress the same point? Demand even more punishment for their political opponents? Cooperate to build a new government more in line with their wishes?