Bypass DeepSeek censorship by speaking in hex
substack.com
FBI, Dutch police disrupt 'Manipulaters' phishing gang
krebsonsecurity.com
Elite on the 6502: The original 6502 assembly source, heavily commented
elite.bbcelite.com
Show HN: Uscope, a new Linux debugger written from scratch
github.com
FurtherAI (YC W24) Is Hiring engineers and researchers to build Vertical AI agents
ycombinator.com
Theoretical limitations of multi-layer Transformer
arxiv.org
Zusie – My Relay Computer
nablaman.com
Paris P2P Festival and Hackathon
p2p.paris
Fixing E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial for the Atari 2600 (2013)
neocomputer.org
Shell-ish scripting in Go with ease
github.com
Better Know a Ruby Thing: Singleton Classes
noelrappin.com
Large Language Models Think Too Fast to Explore Effectively
arxiv.org
Living with Nausea: My Story in Six Charts
c82.net
Meta in talks to reincorporate in Texas or another state, WSJ reports
reuters.com
Apple files emergency motion to become defendant in US vs. Google [pdf]
storage.courtlistener.com
Images reveal exocomets around nearby stars
skyandtelescope.org
GenAI Art Is the Least Imaginative Use of AI Imaginable
hai.stanford.edu
US government agency argues that money isn't property–so it can take yours
reason.com
Real-time, river sections downstream of sewage discharges from storm overflows
sewagemap.co.uk
Instagram and Facebook Blocked and Hid Abortion Pill Providers' Posts
nytimes.com
MillenniumDB: Property graph and RDF engine, still in development
github.com
Hydro: Distributed Programming Framework for Rust
hydro.run
It's a neat result, its maybe a bit to specify sizes. At least with the images provided in the article, they're getting maybe:
10 pixels, across across objects of >1 astronomic unit (149,597,870 km). If those rings are like our own Kuiper belt objects, then those are more like 25-50 AU. If they're like the asteroid belt in the inner solar system, then maybe 2-5 AU.
If those are images from the nearest 74 solar systems, then those are somewhere from 4 ly to 20 ly away (~4e13 km to 2e14 km away). [1][2] They're probably further away.
Based on the stated resolution, ALMA is supposed to get ~10 milliarcseconds (10−7 radians) resolution. [3] With the small angle approx. that means it can resolve:
It's cool though, as it at least implies disc path clearing, orbital harmonics resulting in ring formation, and probably a lot of other implications. Likely gives excellent regions to try looking for further planets, planetoids, or planetesimals. Provides some idea of how likely it is for the conditions in our own solar system to cause similar formations in further away solar systems. Mostly a lot of single rings, not that many double ring groups. Quite a few that end up looking more like bloby clouds.[1] 100 Nearest Star Systems, http://www.recons.org/TOP100.posted.htm
[2] GJ 1005 (#74), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GJ_1005
[3] Atacama Large Millimeter Array, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atacama_Large_Millimeter_Array