Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

X, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube sign EU code to tackle hate speech

pjc50

I'm not sure how well that's going to work when the boss of X is doing gestures that are illegal in Germany.

vanderZwan

> These EU Codes of Conduct are voluntary commitments and companies face no penalties if they decide to back out of the agreement, as Elon Musk did with X (then known as Twitter) in 2022 when he withdrew the company from the Code of Practice on Disinformation.

It's pretty obviously a PR stunt done in bad faith to delay actual legal consequences. I don't understand why this kind of "legal" construct even exists tbh.

nolok

Contrary to what seems to often be believed, the EU way of doing things is to try to make companies do their own agreement and policing, as to avoid the rigidity of regulation unless we absolutely have to.

Another example is how the EU asked the phone manufacturers to agree on a common charger for years on a good will basis, and only had to regulate when samsung said they were going to back out if no regulation was made because apple was not playing ball.

So the idea here is "guys, we really don't want to come here and make a law about what is or isn't allowed to be said or what has to be fact checked and everything, we want you to behave like adults and agree together about said rules".

I believe in this case, the fact that every company is part of the same country and same bunch of absurdly rich tech companies means it's never going to work at all.

kragen

[flagged]

michaelt

Often here in the UK if there's a problem with a particular, the first step in regulation is for the government to talk to the trade body representing the industry and basically say "Regulate yourselves, or be regulated"

Then, if they're sensible, the industry creates a code of conduct that addresses the problems that drew the attention of legislators, without being too onerous; all the main players in the industry sign up and follow it; and the government doesn't have to pass legislation.

Politicians are happy because the problem goes away, and regulatory burdens on industry don't increase. Industry is happy because they get soft-touch regulation that's under their control.

It doesn't always work, of course.

anonymous344

[flagged]

zwnow

It was a naz! salut. Dont belittle his actions, he is a grown man and should be held accountable for the way he presents himself.

Cumpiler69

How do you accurately determine when raising your arm is a Nazi salute and when not? If I raise my arm to hail a cab, what's stopping someone form accusing me of trying to hail Hitler?

To me, it's the context that determines that. From my PoV it looked like he was greeting/thanking the crowd. Plenty of other celebrities and athletes do the exact same gesture towards crowds all the time.

People are too quick to see nazism everywhere when they condition themselves for that. However, I also do see how it can be interpreted as a Nazi salute in this case.

staticelf

One could argue that your own post is hate speech.

We could have a world where we steel man each other, or we can have a world when we try to fight each other in every single regard. You've obviously chosen the second option and that it is the top comment makes me sad.

guappa

One could argue anything, but one risks being called a fool by everyone.

konart

One can be called a fool by everyone because "everyone" means nothing but a vague number in most contexts.

threeseed

> when we try to fight each other in every single regard

Bit hard to be civil when Musk has replicated arguably the most offensive action in human history.

pjc50

Prisoner's dilemma: if you steelman people who won't do the same for you, you're going to get ripped off.

exe34

could you explain what you mean - are you saying that the sign that Elon made, twice, was not a Nazi salute?

staticelf

Yes, that is what I am saying.

ilogik

not sure what is wrong about OPs comment. is there anything false in what he said?

staticelf

Yes the entire statement is false.

gadders

arcticbull

It's going to be really interesting to see how organizations, relying on funding and/or support from the government, will twist themselves to deny what is fairly evident in plain sight hoping to avoid retaliation in general. I'm not sure what Elon was doing/intending to do but the resemblance is uncanny. And he did it twice, just to make sure. The first time, I was like eh, could go either way, he's made unique and enthusiastic gestures in public before before. The second one was more troubling. Certainly the kind of thing that would get you tackled to the floor by German police officers. Even if unintentional, you'd have some time to think about it and some 'splaining to do.

notahacker

The "hey, maybe he's just a bit overexcited and socially awkward with his gestures" excuse would also be a lot more plausible if it was about someone who hasn't spent the last couple of years giving written and verbal encouragement to the far right, who happened to be exactly the sort of person who would see a Nazi salute as a super clever gesture that owns the libs, is deniable to the parts of his fanbase that don't like Nazis, and meets with uproarious approval with the parts of his fanbase that like Nazis. A bit like when he was tweeting out his approval of interviews describing the holocaust as "humane" and then promptly deleting when called out on it or retweeting neo-Nazis talking about Jews' "dialectical hatred against whites" as "the actual truth" but then apologising for it. Sure, mentally he probably has more in common with a 13 year old carving swastikas into their school desk because it's edgy than Himmler, and his far right admirers hate his H1-B visa stance to the point he seems to be really overcompensating, but that doesn't mean we should act like it's a normal way for an adult with the ear of the president to be behaving.

gadders

Haha. That's you characterisation of the ADL? Pretty sure their funding comes from donors rather than the government.

kzrdude

Elon musk did a sign that shows that he's a Nazi. There's no ambiguity, he did the sign the neo-nazis do and it's instantly recognizable. That's my reading of the situation, with my education and background (I grew up & went to school in Sweden) - I mention the background to say that this is how the sign is interpreted where I come from.

konart

I mean, technically, this is a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_salute and it was used extensively during the history. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bellamy_salute for example.

Not to mention that your average dabbing looks like a seig heil while snizzing.

gazchop

That's literally unambiguously a nazi salute. I've seen them before, from actual nazis. Because I am descended from one unfortunately.

It's shameful and at no point does any word play and excuse making around it make it ok. This needs to stop now. Right now.

Add to that the literal support for the far right parties definitely and conclusively aligned with nazi ideology, such as the AfD, it's terrible for everyone.

kragen

The ADL, who is defending him, is the world's foremost anti-neo-Nazi organization. If they say not to worry, I'm going to trust their judgment, even though the photos look pretty questionable to me as a layman.

gadders

[flagged]

MildlySerious

Trump's entire campaign ran on curbing immigration, closing the borders and deportation of illegal immigrants. The one exception to that (the H-1B story) caused a lot of upheaval in his base. Among the many crazy things he said were things like people having to go out and vote for the last time, that he will be a dictator for a day, and calling his political opponents vermin. I'll just mention Project 2025 and his former wife mentioning that he's had a book of Hitler speeches by his bedside in passing.

Among the first acts on his first day as president he shuts down an app that helped people immigrate legally.

The first swath of Biden era executive orders rescinded[1] includes migration related ones to now loosen and reduce oversight and enable more heavy handed treatment of the matter, creating the foundation to conduct the type of raids that started happening the second he was certified[2].

Then at his inauguration this unfortunate little mishap occurs. Twice, mind you. By a man who continually promotes and enables alt-right ideology.

If you squint really, really hard, it's a dog whistle. That's the best case scenario. For everyone else, Elon Musk unambiguously performed a Nazi salute.

The absence of this moment from alt-right safe spaces like r/conservative and the X/Twitter feeds of prominent influencers despite the fact that their user base seems to have loved it is, in itself, a story worth telling.

[1] https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/init...

[2] https://calmatters.org/economy/2025/01/kern-county-immigrati...

gadders

You might not agree with these policies, but they are defensible, sensible policies and not that much different from polices and statements under Obama.

dathinab

fun fact:

> deportation of illegal immigrants

Initially Hitler Germany also, at least to the outside, pushed a position of them just wanting to "deport" Jews outside of Germany. They then decided to instead place them into forced labor camps to extract value out of them while slowly working them to death and later (but not much later) they also started with the industrialized mass killing in death camps.

Similar before murdering Jews they started with going after disabled people and then queer people as this was part of their idea of healing (i.e purging) Germany.

Not saying the US will treat immigrants like Nazi Germany did treat Jews, that would be dump.

But given how they have a profit orientated prison system which more or less forced people to extremely underplayed work and how being an illegal immigrant is a crime and given how some US companies are looking for replacing "cheap labor" from China with something else more under their control I would still be worried.

dathinab

okay lets see

hand placement is that of the Hitler salute

arm placement is that of the Hitler salute

high of the hand is that of the Hitler salute

placement of hand before doing the salute is that of the Hitler salute

even his speech before indicates it's a Hitler salute:

"This is a new beginning. Let’s hope for healing and work toward unity in the months and years ahead"

Now this part needs a bit more explanation: The Hitler salute proper name is "Sieg Heil" which yes meas to "Hail!" someone. But it also literally translated means "victory heal".

The meaning here was to "heal" Germany (which include taking over territories in the twisted interpretation of Nazis) but also to "heal" Germany (from Jews, queer people, disabled people etc. by killing them. It also was all about creating a unified fascist Germany under Hitler. It was also about projecting power and that it's a new Germany.

I.e. "new beginning/new Germany", "heal", "unify", "let's make it grate again" (to use modern lingo) where the core aspects of "Sieg Heil" just with very perfidy interpretations of heal and unify. But then taking otherwise well meaning symbolism (e.g. the swastika) and then appropriating it and turning it into something evil was the standard mode of operation of Nazis.

So he makes a Hitler salute after saying things which Hitler (in slightly different words due to language changing over time) would have said (before going full maks off let's kill all yews).

I rally don't know how anyone could interpret it as not being a nazi salute, that would be supper naive/self blinding/foolish.

Now the more interesting interpretation is does it mean he is a Nazi?

Well probably no.

Nazi is a very specific term, and there are many other kinds of fascism which aren't Nazis (which to be clear "different" doesn't contain a judgement. It neither implies "better" nor "worse").

Through what it is is a very clear statement of "I'm a fascist" and/or "I idolizes at least some aspects of Nazi Germany".

Which, let's be honest, shouldn't surprise anyone who followed what he was doing in roughly the last year.

cgull8

Hate speech is against only one religion. Against all other religions, it is perfectly ok according to these people as well as in Congress.

anonymous344

do you remember 10 years ago when google promised only to tackle cp with their sensorship? and what happened in 2020-2023? all non-pharmaprofital messages were banned, deleted or flagged. Even 100% facts and even questions. wilder than in nz germany. There are already dozens of politicans in eu who has been convited of hate speech when all they did was publish public statistics of rpe crimes or vio1ence.

Why the government officials are not working to prevent actual physical crimes that ruin the rest of the lives of so many young children around the europe?

dathinab

you argument is basically nit picking negative aspects from one side, sometimes taking out of context, too, and then pretending you paint a very clear picture when in fact you do not

Firstly wrt. YouToube censorship a lot is abuse of the copyright system YT doesn't care about because it doesn't make them money. There is still ton's of "non-pharmaprofital" content and similar on YT which wouldn't be there if YT would systematically censor it.

Wrt. politicians while people tend put all kinds of labels onto politicians being "convicted" of hate speech is a very different thing. Not only is it not very common, but in close to all case I had looked into it was done very rightfully so. It's just that after the conviction some (most times) right wing propaganda sources love to ignore a lot of the fundamental aspects/claims/arguments the legal process was based on and then focused on some partial side point which by itself isn't enough to convict anyone for anything and pretends they where convinced for that.

And if you would be you I wouldn't write "even just questions". Because questions aren't necessary any less hate speech then non question. E.g. holocaust denier love to formulate their conspiracy theories in questions (and naturally will ignore or claim fake news if someone answers their questions). But just because you formulate a conspiracy theory as a row of question doesn't make it not a conspiracy theory. And the same for hate speech. You always have to take more then just a sentence into context, something legal proceedings tend to do, and something people hit by such proceedings tend to claim they don't.

In general YT "censorship" as in people abusing the copyright system and similar approaches to "take down" content they don't like is an issue, one which spawns to Google and other places, too.

But giving how much mis-information, propaganda and non-pharmaprofitable information and similar you find on YT _even if you are not looking for it_ claiming that there is a huge problem with systematic censorship _today_ is kinda dump. (Yes in the pandemic there had been and issue, for a short time, before it got replaced by banners. It was a very unusual station no one was quite sure how to handle and people did make mistakes. But taking a short period in history and pretending nothing else change since then when a lot changed isn't very useful).

CodeCompost

As long as those services are operated by companies based in the Fascist Idiotic Republic, I'm not going to believe a word they say.

thrance

Will Zuckerberg add another clause to his TOS, taking it from "it's OK to call someone mentally ill but only if they're queer" [1] to "it's OK to call someone mentally ill but only if they're queer AND don't live in Europe"?

More seriously, I don't see how those companies can enforce this while not severing US users from EU users. They'll probably just ignore it anyway.

[1] https://www.wired.com/story/meta-immigration-gender-policies...

zb3

Hate speech = political speech you don't like

thrance

No, in France it specifically refers to "Harmful speech targeted toward individuals or groups on the basis of intrisinc characteristics [to this group], that may threaten social peace." [1]

If your particular political ideology requires this sort of speech, you should probably do some introspection.

[1] https://www.un.org/fr/hate-speech/understanding-hate-speech/...

zb3

This is already a political position - you might consider something is harmful to a particular group, but I might view this as the opposite. I think it's very easy to see a practical example of this..

dathinab

you argument is basically "everything is a political position"

which defeats your original argument because if everything is a political position practically it's no different to nothing being a political position and as such

and sure application of law in practice is never perfect

but that doesn't mean we should allow people to systematically harass others on the internet, or systematically spread misinformation which is intended to cause deformation of whole groups of people, or calls for violence against people or propaganda with the intend to create more violent racism, etc.

thrance

That's why we have a text of law and jurists that came up with more rigorous definitions. I basically gave you the shortest tldr of a tldr of the subject. I can only recommend you read up on it more, because this really isn't the censorship tool you make it up to be.

zfg

Twitter's already got something to tackle:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jan/20/trump-elo...

I don't think Musk is helping Tesla sales in Europe.

pjc50

Trump rescinding the EV mandate is hardly likely to help Tesla sales _in the US_, and yet they're standing on the same platform.

dathinab

As far as I can tell Elon seem to have lost interest and doesn't care much anymore about Tesla as a Car company the moment where he realized it likely will be just one of many E-Car companies and he likely won't win the race to full self driving in any in a larger picture dominant way.

But Trump in the past multiple times said more or less "he will stop EV mandates and move the subventions over to battery development and production". I.e. if he doesn't just do the first half it means subventions move from profiting a variety to car companies to mainly profiting Tesla(as a battery company).

I.e. this seems long term beneficial for him.

Cumpiler69

>Elon seem to have lost interest and doesn't care much anymore about Tesla as a Car company

I doubt it. The Cybertruck proves he's trying to keep the brand fresh and interest in it alive.

Of course, Tesla's monopoly on EV wasn't gonna last forever since the other makers were inevitably gonna catch up sooner or later.

zb3

I see no problem with his "salute". I'm glad more and more people are rejecting this kind of brainwashing by the media.

zfg

These people also don't see a problem with it: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/elon-mus...

And this person similarly doesn't see a problem with it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tlenyBWs4w&t=88s

zb3

Are you breathing? These people did that too. Doesn't it concern you?

I prefer arguing about the actual policies, I refuse to be concerned "by association".

gadders

[flagged]

ribadeo

Uh no, you can watch the video for yourself. Mush clearly made 2 back to back nazi salutes: Forcefully and unambiguously

PartiallyTyped

He did it, repeatedly, and clearly.

Pls stop trying to sane-wash his actions.

gadders

[flagged]

zfg

What are you claiming? That The Guardian doctored the video?

yosame

How is footage that musk himself reposted misinformation?

sneak

It’s time we start calling these things what they really are: censorship platforms.

They have declared themselves the arbiters of what is or isn’t true, and censor anything that doesn’t align with their views, right or wrong.

At one point YouTube was censoring videos telling people to wear masks, as it contravened the government’s recommendations (who were lying to preserve mask availability for healthcare workers).

Build and use alternatives. Tell your friends and favorite content creators to stop donating content for free to these censorship platforms.

dudefeliciano

what are the alternatives, and how are they not "censorship platforms"?

timbit42

Mastodon is federated, like email so censorship is more difficult as you can switch servers.

Cumpiler69

The alternative is moderation only on content (CP for example) and not on speech (save for crimes like death threats and so on).

The more you censor speech the more radicalized people become against the system setting that censorship. It becomes a self perpetuating feedback loop.

dspillett

> and not on speech save for crimes(death threats and so on).

Dealing with speech that is, actively encourages, or supports (or engenders fear of in potential victims)¹, such crimes, is exactly what this is trying to get the companies to address.

----

[1] That list being the battery/assault/affray equivalents of hate speech

null

[deleted]