Skip to content(if available)orjump to list(if available)

What the US Pornhub 'ban' is really about

Workaccount2

We now have the first generation of people who grew up with easily accessible porn from a young age. Happens to also be the same generation that grew up with violent video games and "parental advisory" music.

Either millennials are a gang of psychotic murdering rapists or religious people are knee-jerk driven idiots.

echelon

These ID-tracking laws are a dragnet to build kompromat and return society to puritanism.

If these lawmakers really cared about children, they'd look into giving them school lunches.

There's far creepier stuff happening on VRChat and Roblox anyway. These lawmakers don't even care enough to understand what they're talking about.

But in any case, the legislation will lag innovation. In two years, you'll be able to generate custom porn of whatever you want on your own device using diffusion video models. No Internet needed.

petre

> you'll be able to generate custom porn of whatever you want on your own device using diffusion video models

I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that, since you did not complete the age verification process.

Clubber

>We now have the first generation ... easily accessible porn from a young age.

I'm GenX and there was always a Playboy or something similar around. Porn on VHS was pretty accessible since it was so easy to copy. There was also "Skinemax," (Cinemax) as we called it after hours.

>grew up with violent video games and "parental advisory" music.

GenX also grew up with this.

snozolli

Your comment reminded me of watching the scrambled Playboy Channel on cable TV, desperately hoping to spot a moderately warped and discolored image of a boob.

For the younger readers, this is approximately what it looked like:

https://www.reddit.com/r/nostalgia/comments/1g05h46/trying_t...

mingus88

Yep. My dad kept his playboys under his bed. I knew as young as probably six or seven. They sold them openly in magazine racks at the gas station and in middles school most boys had easy access.

The 90s had Usenet, IRC and free image galleries. Smut was on AOL and Compuserve. If you had a 56k modem, you could get as much porn as you could download.

Early 2000s had limewire and other early p2p sharing programs. Same places we got pirated games, music and movies was riddled with porn.

Porn has been ubiquitous forever. The demand will always be there. It’s human nature.

snapplebobapple

Definitely psychotic murdering rapists. They are so good at it that they have managed to conceal their heinous actions from the crime statistics. Millennials are clearly supervillains.

petre

Baby boomers grew up with sex, drugs and rock 'n roll, yet they're far from a gang of drug addicted rapists playing loud music.

K0balt

Ymmv

ryandvm

You're right. How do you square that with the fact this generation is also having less sex and having a harder time meeting romantic partners?

jaco6

[dead]

fuzzfactor

There may be some typo discrepancy ;)

>US states where Pornhub and other US states are blocked

>those states have passed laws requiring porn websites to verify that their users are under-18

No adults allowed, their eyes couldn't handle it :)

standardUser

These laws just push people towards shadier sources of porn that have far less oversight or accountability. Even if we were to implement one of the reasonable-sounding age verifications systems mentioned in the article, the outcome would still be more young people discovering porn via torrents or Discord servers or whatever kids use these days, instead of PornHub.

5555624

Related article from CNN, yesteday, "More than a dozen states have passed new laws that led to restrictions on pornography. Now, the Supreme Court will weigh in" https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/11/politics/invs-porn-age-verifi...

ggm

No direct mention of homomorphic encryption but from an Australian review some time ago the privacy commission here was reasonably OK with robust 3rd party privacy preserving cryptographic methods.

I get that the debate here is not about technocrats, it's a society issue not a which technology issue.

matt3210

Society issues change every 4 to 8 years so standby a bit and it’ll change

ggm

Takes longer sometimes. Hawke proposed "Australia card" in 85 and the wave of nup was tsunamical. It's been nupped out for 40 years. The frog is boiling very slowly behind mygov ID.

mlepath

Wait, I thought every pornsite already had age verification, that modal that pops up and says "are you sure you are over 18?"

Volundr

If your in several states they'll ask for a picture of your ID now.

cameldrv

All of these privacy arguments seem a little silly to me given that you have no privacy anyhow. The site is getting an IP address and a browser fingerprint, and that’s enough to uniquely identify a person in most cases.

mingus88

As soon as you have to provide an ID or a credit card to access a site, we’re talking about PII which is a whole different ballgame for privacy.

cameldrv

Maybe from a legal standpoint, but from a practical standpoint, any website who cares to identify you can do so with good probability if they're willing to buy the appropriate databases. Perhaps in some imaginary idealized version of the internet you can just browse sites without it going on your permanent record, but this hasn't been true for a number of years.

leshokunin

The party of small government wants to control what you browse. Your browser, my choice.

nokun7

> In July 2024, Donald Trump ally and Project 2025 contributor Russell Vought sat down

The article lost all credibility by that one statement.

defrost

How so?

* Russell Vought absolutely is an ally of Trump. He served in the first administration, it's been announced he will serve in the second.

* Russell Vought very publicly is a Project 2025 contributor.

* Russell Vought did sit down, multiple times, in July 2024. The specific case intended here has been captured on film.

nokun7

The article attempts to subtly link Trump with Project 2025, despite his explicit denials. While some claims may have merit, the publication's decision to make such connections without concrete evidence undermines its credibility. As an impartial observer, it's concerning that the article resorts to speculative associations rather than focusing on verifiable facts. This approach damages the publication's reputation and risks misleading readers who may not critically evaluate the sources. Trump has categorically denied any involvement with Project 2025, yet the article chooses to highlight potential connections without acknowledging his refutations. This selective reporting undermines journalistic integrity and potentially loses readers' trust in the publication's ability to provide balanced coverage of important issues.

Citations:

[1] https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-i-have-nothing-t...

[2] https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/2024-election/trump-l...

defrost

> The article attempts to subtly link Trump with Project 2025,

There are explicit links between the two; firstly the core authors are former Trump staffers, secondly after the publication several have been invited to work in the second administration. These are links.

> despite his explicit denials.

Trump has history, both before and during his political career, of lying; promises he never carried through on, denials of things later shown to be true. From his apprenticeship with his slumlord father through until the present he has been a consumment grifter. All politicians lie, true, few have lied as much as Trump.

In short, the link exists and his denial carries no weight.

jaco6

[dead]

aaron695

[dead]